M
Michael_Mayo
Guest
Or the entire population for empowering Hitler in the first place?So At the end of World War II we should have prosecuted those who ran the death camps but not those who hired them to do so?
Or the entire population for empowering Hitler in the first place?So At the end of World War II we should have prosecuted those who ran the death camps but not those who hired them to do so?
A pithy statement with no substance.Appointed by the Democrat House of Lords
So do you think that the superdelegates should vote for Sanders instead? And if there were no superdelegates in the Democratic party, Clinton would still be the nominee because she will still come out with more pledged delegates than Sanders. BTW, the superdelegates are only about 15% of the total number of delegates.Appointed by the Democrat House of Lords
We don’t know that The fact that she had 15% of the delegates wrapped up before the first vote was cast gave her a huge boost that gave her unearned momentum going into the early primaries But one thing the Democrat elite does not want is the unwashed masses picking someone they don’t approve of.So do you think that the superdelegates should vote for Sanders instead? And if there were no superdelegates in the Democratic party, Clinton would still be the nominee because she will still come out with more pledged delegates than Sanders.
Does she have the nomination clinched without unelected delegates?A pithy statement with no substance.
I’m sure that a lot of Republicans wish the same thing. Trump will probably be a disaster for the Republican party.But one thing the Democrat elite does not want is the unwashed masses picking someone they don’t approve of.
He’s used that phrase several times.
A pithy statement with no substance
Republicans have been denouncing him left and right today and this past weekend. Of course they are going to vote for him anyway. Go figure.I’m sure that a lot of Republicans wish the same thing. Trump will probably be a disaster for the Republican party.
Would the delegates be going against the will of the people?Does she have the nomination clinched without unelected delegates?
Not at all, of course. Hillary has millions of more votes than Sanders (and Trump).Would the delegates be going against the will of the people?
I’m sorry, but the attack on the judge is racist. If Trump said the judge was incompetent, that would have been fine (not smart though). But he said that he was motivated by his race because Trump is ‘going to build a wall’ and that the judge ‘happens to be, we believe, Mexican’. That’s straight out racist. No Hispanic can judge him because Trump is going to build a wall. And no Muslim can judge him because he’s going to ban Muslims from coming into the country. He hasn’t gotten to women yet, but I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s next.I don’t think Trump said it at all well, but I think he has reason to question the impartiality of this judge.
I’ll admit I’m probably spoiled by the fact that in my state judges are not supposed to engage in politics at all, other than their own re-election campaigns. They have to be very careful in avoiding even the appearance of it. That’s the rule so they wouldn’t be questioned as to politically-based biases. Also, in my state, you can disqualify one judge just because you want to, without giving any reason for it. You can’t do that with federal judges. If you want to disqualify one of them, you have to ask them to disqualify and state your reasons. If the federal judge doesn’t do it, you have criticized him without having any remedy at all.
It’s very common for judges who don’t want a biased jury to keep evidence sealed until trial. In this case, there was no good reason for the judge to release it to the public, but he did, despite Trump’s lawyers asking him not to do it. And he did it even though he, himself declared the testimony of the initiating plaintiff unworthy of belief.
Once Judge Curiel released all of the unproven allegations against Trump, that posed two problems for Trump. One is that it will provide campaign material for Hillary Clinton which will undoubtedly be used as if it was undeniably true. The bigger problem ultimately is that the political use of it will make it hard to find an unbiased jury that hasn’t seen any of the spin the Clinton campaign will put on the unproven allegations, including the ones the judge determined unworthy of belief.
There’s not much Trump can do about either problem other than discount it in some way and in advance. So, Trump, as he is wont to do, decided to get out in front of it. I’m not saying he did it well, but that’s what he does when he sees what’s ahead of him in the campaign.
Well, we’ve had Paul Ryan, John Kasich and Newt Gingrich say that Trump is being foolish in criticizing the judge overseeing the case against him. They know darn well that they are about to lose Hispanics for the foreseeable future based on Trump going straight out racist.I’m sure that a lot of Republicans wish the same thing. Trump will probably be a disaster for the Republican party.
I guess that explains why he brought it up multiple times. Of course, this explanation will be acceptable to his supporters since they have to keep up the fiction that Trump didn’t make racist comments.On The O’Reilly Factor, Donald Trump said regarding Judge Curial, “I don’t care if the Judge is Mexican or not” “so I don’t care about Mexican.” He then said again that he didn’t care about the Mexican stuff in relation to the Judge.
Some of the most important material that was released did not involve “unproven allegations”. It included internal Trump University materials like the “playbook” which gave instructions for how instructors should try to get people to take expensive Gold Elite courses even if they couldn’t afford it by convincing them to put the charges on their credit cards. So that kind of material is not just an “allegation” by some dissatisfied former student.Once Judge Curiel released all of the unproven allegations against Trump, that posed two problems for Trump. One is that it will provide campaign material for Hillary Clinton which will undoubtedly be used as if it was undeniably true. The bigger problem ultimately is that the political use of it will make it hard to find an unbiased jury that hasn’t seen any of the spin the Clinton campaign will put on the unproven allegations, including the ones the judge determined unworthy of belief.
BuzzFeed has pulled out ofanadvertising agreement with the Republican National Committee over objections to Donald Trump’s rhetoric.
The buy was for $1.3 million, a source close to BuzzFeed told POLITICO. The source said that the main consideration was the site’s employees – that BuzzFeed could not countenance “having employees make ads, or working at the company and having our site promoting things, that limit our freedom and make it harder for them to live their lives.”
Asked if the site would rule out any Trump advertising, the source said the specifics would matter: “In general, we have taken the position that we won’t take ads for his presidential campaign.”
I hope I’m not wrong on this, but despite the ugliness in Trump’s comment, and btw I’m not Caucasian myself, I’m not convinced he is a racist. I think Boreli is probably right, that there are all kinds of people who would attest that Trump is not a racist. I think there are ethnic minority individuals who would attest that Trump has treated them fairly, that he has treated them like anybody else. To be a racist you have to believe that a race is superior to another. I doubt Trump believes that. But I can’t see in his heart. But I’m not convinced he a racist, despite the Judge Curial comments being offensive, and discriminatory.I’m sorry, but the attack on the judge is racist. If Trump said the judge was incompetent, that would have been fine (not smart though). But he said that he was motivated by his race because Trump is ‘going to build a wall’ and that the judge ‘happens to be, we believe, Mexican’. That’s straight out racist. No Hispanic can judge him because Trump is going to build a wall. And no Muslim can judge him because he’s going to ban Muslims from coming into the country. He hasn’t gotten to women yet, but I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s next.
So, you can claim whatever you want to make excuses for Trump’s racist behavior, as people seem like to make excuses for his willingness to torture and his desire to target noncombatants.
Just as the Dems dismiss all the controversy that follows Clinton. Go figure.Republicans have been denouncing him left and right today and this past weekend. Of course they are going to vote for him anyway. Go figure.
You mean like the Benghazi committee?Just as the Dems dismiss all the controversy that follows Clinton. Go figure.![]()
That Benghazi commitee research website is clearly not independent. Perhaps the New York Times should have waited to see what the report will actually say before running what it seems to me, a defence for Clinton from the editorial board.You mean like the Benghazi committee?
benghazicommittee.com/benghazi-by-the-numbers/
nytimes.com/2016/06/04/opinion/the-benghazi-committees-dead-end.html?_r=0