Donald Trump Will Skip the Fox News Debate

  • Thread starter Thread starter Seamus_L
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
meltzerboy said:
With regard to your comment about the type of president you would rather have, I believe in Trump you will have BOTH a rude president and one who supports pro-choice and euthanasia.
Click to expand...
they play a soundbite where he boasts, if elected, he will be the best president ever. if he is elected, I hope he will do his best to fulfill that promise. he might have to be rude to get the job done and I think once someone gets to the Oval Office they have reverence for the position. Hopefully, he won’t abuse the Constitution like Obama has done. Trump is a businessman, not a lawyer.
 
GaryTaylor said:
I think many people have been in the WH since Roe vs Wade and have good intentions. Yet we haven’t seen much progress, Trump may not give it much thought after either. I don’t think he would advocate, but really address the issue? I don’t know, Cruz would. But Donald could make a mess with war in the middle east. What if he becomes unruly there? What about this cost of life? I do think his national security stance is leaning toward correct these days as opposed to his initial rhetoric. Yet his language leaves a lot to be desired and is very insulting. Listen when I’m insulted by his language I KNOW those at the end of his comments for sure are. How is that good, to say, well the left perfected the game, is to say two wrongs are right?
Click to expand...
I really don’t expect a president to address the issue of abortion, to be perfectly honest. But to be in complete partnership with PP is completely unacceptable and beneath the POTUS.

I agree Cruz is a better choice. Trump will surround himself with experts who will handle things in the Middle East. I have a son who just joined the military so I care greatly about the loss of military life. Always have and I have always verbalized it to extreme pro-lifers that are also pro-war.

I also find him insulting and my family is from New York. ;). We are not thin-skinned people.
 
meltzerboy said:
Do you think a Trump-Cruz ticket is possible despite their animosity for one another? It happened with Reagan and Bush as well as Kennedy and Johnson.
Click to expand...
No. What would Cruz bring to the ticket? He doesn’t help with either electability or governing.
 
Maximilan_Kolbe said:
As has been said before, those who dislike’s Trump’s rise have no one to blame but the members of both parties. You have an administration that ran on transparency but has done most of its finest work under the shroud of darkness, and made every attempt to willfully disregard both the constitution and the will of the people. Everything has been purely ideological. And you have a Republican party that refuses to even buck the status quo, after years of promises to do just that.

People from both sides of the aisle are fed up and have had enough of the status quo. Perhaps if either the Democrats had been successful for average Americans while in power or Republicans had shown any backbone in doing what they were elected to do in 2010 or 2014, we would not have seen such a surge for an outsider.

I don’t want to hear anyone who supported Obama decrying Trump, as he is simply a product of dissatisfaction with the last 8 years.
Click to expand...
This!👍👍👍
 
Beautiful said:
Trump is not a liar.
He publicly says what everyone knows…Kelley is very bias against Trump. I question why Fox would allow her a chance to dig her nails in a second time knowing she is so vehemently against him. It was time for a new panel of people to ask questions. Kelley had her one public chance…time to move on.
Trump is very wise to boycott Fox.
Click to expand...
Yes, think Megyn is so anti Trump she shod have been pulled from this debate. She is not fair and balanced! I think too he was trying to make a point! Now she can claw at another candidate. And watch the ratings drop!
 
lax16 said:
I really don’t expect a president to address the issue of abortion, to be perfectly honest. But to be in complete partnership with PP is completely unacceptable and beneath the POTUS.

I agree Cruz is a better choice. Trump will surround himself with experts who will handle things in the Middle East. I have a son who just joined the military so I care greatly about the loss of military life. Always have and I have always verbalized it to extreme pro-lifers that are also pro-war.

I also find him insulting and my family is from New York. ;). We are not thin-skinned people.
Click to expand...
Thanks to your son for joining the military service (and thanks to you for your son)! 👍
 
grotto said:
Thanks to your son for joining the military service (and thanks to you for your son)! 👍
Click to expand...
Amen
We are not thin-skinned people.
Click to expand...
I suspect a good deal of people who been around the block are not, but still it would go a long way to correct the abusive language as we move along. Or its not time yet? We’ll get to that later and address that along with world peace at the same time?
 
grotto said:
Both of your accusations are wrong. Mr. Trump is a generous benefactor to our Wounded Warriors and genuinely an advocate for our Vets.

He is not trying to extort anything but avoiding an unnecessary repeat of “flaming”.
Click to expand...
If anything has changed since this article was written (December 2015) no, Mr. Trump isn’t a generous benefactor.

forbes.com/sites/emilycanal/2015/12/03/donald-trump-veterans/#4a02e3396c9e
The Donald J. Trump Foundation has donated $5.5 million to 298 charities between 2009 and 2013 (the most recent year available), according to the non-profit’s 990 tax forms from those years. Of that, only $57,000 has been donated to seven organizations that directly benefit military veterans or their families, Forbes found. Wounded Warriors was not among the organizations Trump’s foundation gave to in that time period.
Click to expand...
 
GaryTaylor said:
Amen
Click to expand...
Thank you!
I suspect a good deal of people who been around the block are not, but still it would go a long way to correct the abusive language as we move along. Or its not time yet? We’ll get to that later and address that along with world peace at the same time?
Click to expand...
I agree it should be corrected. I am convinced that the women in his life tell him this all the time.

Yes, it is time. Now.
 
Iron_Donkey said:
Calling women fat, ugly, and piggish is boorish. I don’t hold people to PC, but basic politeness is generally a good thing.

As for defining evil - that which is opposed to the will of God is sufficient for this discussion. You say you don’t want a saint. What does that mean? The difference between saints and non-saints is generally that non-saints do more evil.
Click to expand...
What did you think of Bill Clinton?
 
lax16 said:
One person has a proven track record for her belief system and continues to voice her position.

Another person claims to have been wishy-washy here, pro-blank there, but has evolved.

They are the same?
Click to expand...
I’d like concrete proof of the evolution, something more than a reference to a super-star child that wasn’t aborted.
 
Mary_Gail_36 said:
I’d like concrete proof of the evolution, something more than a reference to a super-star child that wasn’t aborted.
Click to expand...
👍 A reporter recently asked him if he would have changed his opinion on abortion if the “super-star” would have turned out to be a loser and Trump said “No, probably not.” :rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top