Donald Trump's war on Megyn Kelly

  • Thread starter Thread starter gilliam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Here is another gem I somehow missed:

View attachment 22185

Also there are a couple of quotes from The Apprentice that I don’t think would get past the censors - so I will leave them out. :o (being on one’s knees…)
 
Oh, the apprentice, a TV show, well that settles it.

:rotfl:

I’ll remember that if one comes back to their house and finds a family has moved in, we shouldn’t cause a hardship on that family by moving them out.

:whistle:
 
Oh, the apprentice, a TV show, well that settles it.

:rotfl:

I’ll remember that if one comes back to their house and finds a family has moved in, we shouldn’t cause a hardship on that family by moving them out.

:whistle:
No worries, I forgive his moral turpitude. I just don’t think he is qualified to be president. And I am a sucker for Christian values, even for wetbacks.
 
We need a leader as a President, not a goody-two-shoes.

It may be a different situation, “Old Blood and Guts”, General Patton and no one is saying Trump is like this or like Churchill or like Reagan, I do think Trump has some big positives nonetheless.

And as I said, I think Christie has some of these positive qualities though he’s been accused of being big government and I think one of his appointees, court appointee may have been an openly gay person or may have been in a same-sex marriage, I forget, it is something like this.

There are a lot of detracting factors on most all of the candidates.
 
Trump speaks up for Veterans, who he has spoken very well.

A lot of Veterans have had bad hospital care by the hospitals as we all know. But, somehow, people entering this country illegally often get better treatment and soak the system??

Trump has worked with Wounded Warriors and other good causes, I think he definitely has good in him versus just trying to make him out to be a bad guy. This other stuff, we talk about, is in the past, with some candidates it might matter, it still matters but Trump does have a good message of urgency especially after the last 8 years.
 
No worries, I forgive his moral turpitude. I just don’t think he is qualified to be president. And I am a sucker for Christian values, even for wetbacks.
Or one could say one is for a lawless society, that laws mean nothing, that using the money of fellow citizens means nothing, while the American Middle Class hurts or even decreases, as long as we are helping out some people who do nothing to help the Pro-Life cause.

I don’t call this a Christian value.
 
Or one could say one is for a lawless society, that laws mean nothing, that using the money of fellow citizens means nothing, while the American Middle Class hurts or even decreases, as long as we are helping out some people who do nothing to help the Pro-Life cause.

I don’t call this a Christian value.
Nor do I, I call it off topic drivel.
 
‘Wetbacks’ ?
Shorthand for America destroying - violent criminal - Democratic voting - illegal immigrant. No offense intended, just faster to type. My serious point is that I think this somewhat overly broad characterization of Hispanic immigrants, legal or illegal, lacks charity and is profoundly unChristian. (i.e., not much different from a racial slur)
 
Nor do I, I call it off topic drivel.
Unkind remarks and you used a term in another post that is at times, not always, an epithet. So, I can remember, it sounds like you have a personal connection to this situation.

At the same time, there are many persons of color who are not for us to have open borders, so we pay millions in social services for millions of people, who then, if they get a right to vote, are not always voting charitably.
 
Shorthand for America destroying - violent criminal - Democratic voting - illegal immigrant. No offense intended, just faster to type. My serious point is that I think this somewhat overly broad characterization of Hispanic immigrants, legal or illegal, lacks charity and is profoundly unChristian. (i.e., not much different from a racial slur)
Good one sees it that way because it seems there is only person to bring up such a characterization/epithet so that is in agreement.

The Southwest too, by no means, is full of Hispanics who say “Let everybody in”, Santa Fe, Trinidad, Puebla, lots of places. So if one plays the race card, it’s flimsy, I’ll tell anyone that.
 
So, I can remember, it sounds like you have a personal connection to this situation.
I don’t have any sort of personal connection to this situation whatsoever other than your comments about Hispanic immigrants are offensive to me. Please refrain from making personal comments about me. It is against forum rules.
 
I don’t have any sort of personal connection to this situation whatsoever other than your comments about Hispanic immigrants are offensive to me. Please refrain from making personal comments about me. It is against forum rules.
The view expressed has no rationality, thus, one could think there is a personal connection.

Also, the accusation that one speaks negatively of Hispanics is nothing but playing the race card and a personal attack as well.

I’ve been to Santa Fe, Las Vegas, Española, Santa Rosa New Mexico, if one thinks all Hispanics say let them in, that is the ultimate in ridiculousness as a Hispanic in this forum has said Trump is saying what needs to be said.

And guess what? Those people have been there since Spain discovered it. So, this does not fool anyone.
 
Shorthand for America destroying - violent criminal - Democratic voting - illegal immigrant. No offense intended, just faster to type. My serious point is that I think this somewhat overly broad characterization of Hispanic immigrants, legal or illegal, lacks charity and is profoundly unChristian. (i.e., not much different from a racial slur)
I don’t like the term and using a term for a group of people like that.
 
washingtonpost.com/politics/poll-finds-hispanic-disapproval-of-trump-rhetoric-on-illegal-immigrants/2015/07/15/a39f53fc-2b05-11e5-a250-42bd812efc09_story.html
Poll finds Hispanic disapproval of Trump rhetoric on illegal immigrants
As Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump travels the country issuing strong condemnations of illegal immigrants and the government of Mexico, Hispanic voters are listening — and they don’t like what they are hearing, according to a new survey.
The Univision News Poll, conducted by the independent research firm Bendixen & Amandi International with the Tarrance Group, shows that 7 in 10 Hispanic registered voters say they have an unfavorable impression of the New York businessman. Nine in 10 Hispanics say they have heard about Trump’s comments and, when read specific remarks, nearly 8 in 10 say they find them offensive.
Hispanic lawmakers call on Trump to apologize
thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/245607-hispanic-lawmakers-call-on-trump-to-apologize
The Congressional Hispanic Caucus called on Donald Trump to apologize for incendiary comments he made toward Mexicans during his presidential campaign announcement speech earlier this week.
In a blistering statement Friday afternoon, Congressional Hispanic Caucus Chairwoman Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-Calif.) said she and fellow lawmakers were “outraged” by his comments that she said “perpetuate hateful stereotypes toward the Latino community.”
“Donald Trump owes an apology to the millions of Mexicans in this country who have contributed their talents towards making the United States the envy of the world,” Sanchez said.
Catholic leaders hope message from pope and U.S. bishops will revive immigration reform
washingtonpost.com/national/catholic-leaders-hope-message-from-pope-and-us-bishops-will-revive-immigration-reform/2014/03/27/65c2676c-b5d2-11e3-b899-20667de76985_story.html
American Catholic leaders are hoping that President Obama’s meeting with Pope Francis at the Vatican on Thursday will strengthen his resolve to soften U.S. policy on deportations, and that the pontiff’s call for compassion toward migrants will also bolster the prospects for immigration reform, now stalled in Congress.
Church officials have staged several high-profile events to reinforce the pope’s message. On Wednesday, a delegation led by Los Angeles Archbishop José Gomez brought the young daughter of a man facing deportation to meet the pope at the Vatican. Next week, a group of bishops led by Boston’s Cardinal Sean O’Malley will visit the U.S.-Mexican border and celebrate Mass for migrants in Nogales, Mexico.
But although Obama recently signaled that he may be willing to soften the rules on deportation — and the girl’s father was released from federal detention Thursday — there is no indication that the late-hour involvement of even the most senior Catholic officials is likely to move House Republicans to reopen debate on broader immigration reforms.
 
I don’t like the term and using a term for a group of people like that.
I am sorry I offended you. But that was my point. It is a despicable term.

I also fear that the mentality expressed by the term will play a pretty key role in Trump’s renewed Great America should he win the election.
 
New Mexico, is a semi-one-party state. Largely Democratic and that is entrenched in its history really, though in the past, the Democrats did not stand for what they do now.

Operation Rescue has articles calling it the Old West for abortion clinics, they don’t have an uncommonly high rate of abortion there for the state but they do have what is known as “abortion tourism”. That is speaking mainly about clinics in Albuquerque I should add on, maybe only in Albuquerque, the Duke City (It is named for a Spanish Duke historically).

I know what close to a one party system is. I also know the border, Mexico is an enchanting country but since 2006, things got really bad there. They always had a little of this there but it was not in a great amount. We have to be careful as to what spills over, that is a real concern.

So, I do get some of the points being made on this debate Trump brings. As they say about Tierra Amarilla (or the beautiful Chama) New Mexico, first forgotten by Spain, then Mexico and then the USA. I have some understanding of the situation.
 
Fox chief Roger Ailes: Trump’s attack on Kelly is ‘disturbing’

money.cnn.com/2015/08/25/media/fox-support-megyn-kelly-donald-trump/
👍

It is, it is so immature and almost looks like an infatuation or something, I can’t believe he’d do that. If it was as some of these politicians have, someone working for the campaign doing that, then you’d find out who tweeted and bring in some discipline. We will see. As I said, he certainly is not my first candidate. It looks a bit like mental instability but I’m not quite ready to say it is that. Some of these other candidates should perhaps sound off.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top