H
Here_For_Donuts
Guest
Protestants are heretics.
SourceProtestants are heretics.
In my mind, the number of votes for non-catholics should be 0. There is no compromise where truth is concerned and I don’t understand why people think the Catholic Church needs to compromise its beliefs to bring others back in.*The problem is not the Catholic Church but the apostasy of ProtestantismYou realize by bolding the whole sentence you are saying that the teaching of the CC is stating that the Catholic Church is the problem?
No. I don’t think that’s the case, but I will clarify.You realize by bolding the whole sentence you are saying that the teaching of the CC is stating that the Catholic Church is the problem?
818 "However, one cannot charge with the sin of the separation those who at present are born into these communities [that resulted from such separation] and in them are brought up in the faith of Christ, and the Catholic Church accepts them with respect and affection as brothers . . . . All who have been justified by faith in Baptism are incorporated into Christ; they therefore have a right to be called Christians, and with good reason are accepted as brothers in the Lord by the children of the Catholic Church."272
Hope that’s clearer819 "Furthermore, many elements of sanctification and of truth"273 are found outside the visible confines of the Catholic Church: "the written Word of God; the life of grace; faith, hope, and charity, with the other interior gifts of the Holy Spirit, as well as visible elements."274** Christ’s Spirit uses these Churches and ecclesial communities as means of salvation,** whose power derives from the fullness of grace and truth that Christ has entrusted to the Catholic Church. All these blessings come from Christ and lead to him,275 and are in themselves calls to "Catholic unity."276
That’s an easy one Jon. Catholic Answers has a tract named The Great HeresiesSource
Where does it say Protestants are heretics? Me, for example. Born baptized raised Lutheran?That’s an easy one Jon. Catholic Answers has a tract named The Great Heresies
This article makes it very clear that the Catholic Church considers Protestantism to be a heresy:
**
The Great Heresies**
…………let’s look at some of the major heresies of Church history and when they began.
Protestantism (16th Century)
Protestant groups display a wide variety of different doctrines. However, virtually all claim to believe in the teachings of sola scriptura (“by Scripture alone”—the idea that we must use only the Bible when forming our theology) and sola fide (“by faith alone”— the idea that we are justified by faith only).
The great diversity of Protestant doctrines stems from the doctrine of private judgment, which denies the infallible authority of the Church and claims that each individual is to interpret Scripture for himself. This idea is rejected in 2 Peter 1:20, where we are told the first rule of Bible interpretation: “First of all you must understand this, that no prophecy of Scripture is a matter of one’s own interpretation.” A significant feature of this heresy is the attempt to pit the Church “against” the Bible, denying that the magisterium has any infallible authority to teach and interpret Scripture.
The doctrine of private judgment has resulted in an enormous number of different denominations. According to The Christian Sourcebook, there are approximately 20-30,000 denominations, with 270 new ones being formed each year. Virtually all of these are Protestant.
NIHIL OBSTAT: I have concluded that the materials
presented in this work are free of doctrinal or moral errors.
Bernadeane Carr, STL, Censor Librorum, August 10, 2004
IMPRIMATUR: In accord with 1983 CIC 827
permission to publish this work is hereby granted.
+Robert H. Brom, Bishop of San Diego, August 10, 2004
Refer to Jons quote , no we are not heretics.Protestants are heretics.
The CCC says that “often enough, men of both sides were to blame.” 817The division is not one-sided. Even the Catholic Catechism recognizes blame on both sides. From this side of the Tiber, and with all due respect, this attitude seems a significant barrier to ecumenism. And guess what, there are some on our side with the same attitude.
I’ll say this as lovingly and caring as possible , Heresy is attacking an essential of the faith , we do not deny an essential so we are not heretics as you claim , though we disagree with your church , so instead of labeling everyone who disagrees with you as an heretic and or apostate , recognize that not ever believer will agree on everything.The CCC says that “often enough, men of both sides were to blame.” 817
No one said all the members of the church were perfect and no doubt some of them were to blame. The problem is not who was to blame. Instead, the question is why, if someone were truly saved and in search of the Truth, would that person reject the Catholic Church after learning about it? I do not think it is Church teaching that you can be saved by rejecting truth in order to maintain a preferred church membership.
I don’t see how it is. My statement is regarding the continuing division, not the original schism, apostasy, heresy or whatever term is preferred.From all I can gather, the bolded part of your statement is in direct contradiction to Catholic teaching:
Jon
um, the very definition of heresy in the CCC says that if you do not agree with EVERY essential teaching of the Church, then that is heresy, and I don’t see how anyone who knows of the CC but stays away believes everything the CC teaches as necessary to believe.I’ll say this as lovingly and caring as possible , Heresy is attacking an essential of the faith , we do not deny an essential so we are not heretics as you claim , though we disagree with your church , so instead of labeling everyone who disagrees with you as an heretic and or apostate , recognize that not ever believer will agree on everything.
That’s what I understood you to mean as well and it’s a valid claim as we see more and more division as time goes on in non Catholic denoms.I don’t see how it is. My statement is regarding the continuing division, not the original schism, apostasy, heresy or whatever term is preferred.
This assumes that what the Catholic Church teaches, in all areas, is truth. You, as a Catholic should believe that.The CCC says that “often enough, men of both sides were to blame.” 817
No one said all the members of the church were perfect and no doubt some of them were to blame. The problem is not who was to blame. Instead, the question is why, if someone were truly saved and in search of the Truth, would that person reject the Catholic Church after learning about it? I do not think it is Church teaching that you can be saved by rejecting truth in order to maintain a preferred church membership.
Schism, heresy, and apostasy are not interchangeable terms. You said: *The problem is not the Catholic Church but the apostasy of Protestantism. *I don’t see how it is. My statement is regarding the continuing division, not the original schism, apostasy, heresy or whatever term is preferred.
The internet? Is that thing still around?There’s an old saying that “Nations get the leaders they deserve.” I think that’s an over-generalization … but it gets me to thinking, particularly when I read all the lowest-common-denominator discussions on the internet, that perhaps we as a society *deserve *the internet.![]()
Yes. Al Gore still gets his royalties.The internet? Is that thing still around?
As documented by the CA tract on the Great Heresies, Jon, Protestantism IS a heresy. You don’t seem to object to that label for Protestantism as a whole, but you object to individual modern Protestants as being heretics? Why are you not equally bothered by the CA tract designation of Protestantism as a heresy? Don’t you care about that also?Where does it say Protestants are heretics? Me, for example. Born baptized raised Lutheran?
True. The Catholic Church, has acknowledged, with great humility, its role and share of the blame for our division. It would be ‘nice’ if there were some kind of official corresponding acceptance of blame from Lutheranism – some official declaration exhibiting the same kind of humility. However, there isn’t one. Please correct me if I am wrong here. I would love to be wrong on this point. My respect for Lutheranism would grow significantly if I am in fact wrong. From my perspective Jon, and from this side of the Tiber, with all due respect, it is the absence of this kind of humility and willingness from Lutheranism to accept ANY of the blame that IS a “barrier to ecumenism.”The division is not one-sided. Even the Catholic Catechism recognizes blame on both sides. From this side of the Tiber, and with all due respect, this attitude seems a significant barrier to ecumenism.