Your still avoiding my points in regards to Iraq being a “wake up call” for what happens when a secular government or regime is removed from power in a ME state. Avoiding them so much that you have now started using generalizations and have completely dropped any reference to secular governments. Additionally, Iraq’s current government isn’t Islamist (Iran’s is, but from some reason you don’t seem to want to use it as an example of persecution of non-Muslims).Christians have always been persecuted in the House of Islam—Egypt too. Dhimmitude is as old as the Koran.
It doesn’t mean that Muslims don’t kill other Muslims, or it doesn’t discount that there are all kinds of ethnic/tribal/cultural/religious divisions that give reasons for violence. It doesn’t discount that tribalism prevails in the Arab world even now.
The fact that there are a whole host of reasons that Muslims kill others was tangential to the point that Iraq ought to have been a wake up call to what enabling an Islamist Middle East is going to bring about.
Iraq really ought to have served as a wake up call, and informed foreign policy.
No, we shouldn’t.We should be supporting the military and in fact help them.
Yes we should.No, we shouldn’t.
By its own people? You have the END of tyranny. A lesson we should pay close attention to. Its how democracy indeed works.what happens when a secular government or regime is removed.
Only if you place your nation’s interests above the teachings of your faith (remove morality and legality from the discussion and just focus on the political/power aspects and it’s in our nation’s best interest to keep the military in power)Yes we should.![]()
What bad guy? The MB is the bad guy. And yes we should be backing the already established militaryOnly if you place your nation’s interests above the teachings of your faith (remove morality and legality from the discussion and just focus on the political/power aspects and it’s in our nation’s best interest to keep the military in power)
or
you think the Church teaches that it’s ok to ignore the immoral acts of and give support to Bad Guy A because he is against Bad Guy B. If this were a 1950s Western, both the MB and the Egyptian military would be wearing black hats.
Yes, right, Saint Paul taught Muslims to burn churches.These wahabi bakri’s ideology of burning churches, mosques, house of workships comes from Omer (Paul in our religion)
Any organization that has a long history of using torture, disproportionate force and violence, “disappearing” people, engaging in repressive activities in order to maintain political power, and indiscriminately opening fire on civilians is a “bad guy” in my book. But, I’m one of those silly people who determines who is or is not a “bad guy” based on the actions of the person/individual, not on the faith of their victims.What bad guy? The MB is the bad guy. And yes we should be backing the already established military
The Church isn’t involved, obviously the President could care less about dead Christians.
Well Im talking not about sending 1st Cav and the Marines in, but geez, its suicide by military there. That’s all that is, and innocents being killed. The military is provoked and attempting to slow the slaughter of innocents by offensive force is an absolute.Any organization that has a long history of using torture, disproportionate force and violence, “disappearing” people, engaging in repressive activities in order to maintain political power, and indiscriminately opening fire on civilians is a “bad guy” in my book. But, I’m one of those silly people who determines who is or is not a “bad guy” based on the actions of the person/individual, not on the faith of their victims.
-The Egyptian military has been engaging in immoral acts long before the “Arab Spring” or this latest round of protests.Well Im talking not about sending 1st Cav and the Marines in, but geez, its suicide by military there. That’s all that is, and innocents being killed. The military is provoked and attempting to slow the slaughter of innocents by offensive force is an absolute.
We should be supporting them, because of our interest in the canal among our terrible habit of selling military weapons to them. Two good reasons why if you can’t say something good, than Obama should shut up. He’s buying time and doesn’t know which way this is going, so be should he quiet.
I agree, depends what we mean by support,-The Egyptian military has been engaging in immoral acts long before the “Arab Spring” or this latest round of protests.
-The means (torture, “disappearings,” indiscriminate shooting, etc) are not justified by the ends (stopping the same behavior by the MB).
-We keep sending military weapons to the Egyptian military because of it’s in our nation’s strategic/political interests to keep them in power regardless of how repressive or immoral they are. This is a hold over from our “the ends justify the means” approach to defeating the Soviet Union (and it’s dependents) we used during the Cold War.
-The only people we should be supporting in Egypt are the innocent victims, those trying to peacefully and/or morally change their government, and the organizations calling for a moral approach to resolving the violence.
So it is the Morsi supporters (that group of 250,000) who have been sitting in the square for weeks now who have just been dispersed this week who are killing the Christians and not the military government.(Coptic) Bishop Anba Suriel tweeted, “It is becoming clear that this is a planned and systemic attack by the MB against the Copts and their churches in Egypt. May God help us!”
Tallying the destruction
More than 40 churches were attacked. Including Coptic, Greek Orthodox, Catholic, and Anglican.
In Egypt, Media Sympathizes with Muslim Brotherhood, Persecution of Christians Ignored
Only steel bars saved Suez priest, family
Morsi supporters either belong to or agree with the Muslim Brotherhood. They are the ones attacking Christian churches. They are also the ones (probably not necessarily the exact same people) who were in the two major “sit ins” over the last few weeks.So it is the Morsi supporters (that group of 250,000) who have been sitting in the square for weeks now who have just been dispersed this week who are killing the Christians and not the military government.
It is the muslim military government who is killing the Morsi supporters as they try to break up the crowds?
Is there any agreement on these thread on who is killing whom?
Funny I don’t get much news free but I get EWTN and Catholic TV and Al-Jazeera English free.
Thanks for the linkNot sure how long this link will work, but I’m reading The Guardian’s live feed.
theguardian.com/world/middle-east-live/2013/aug/16/egypt-muslim-brotherhood-day-iof-rage-live