E
exoflare
Guest
my question you responded toA “no” to what? I’m not sure i understand your statement.
my question you responded toA “no” to what? I’m not sure i understand your statement.
And sad.That’s unbelievable.
Thank you… I felt like I was all alone…Picking Ryan showed that Romney had no common sense on what matters to people.
He lost my vote on that pick.
Jim
The thing that bothers me most is that, with an Obama win, he will likely get to nominate a couple of Supreme Court justices.That is sad IMO… too many more abortions.
Don’t let anyone make you feel guilty for how you voted.That isn’t very nice. I did not vote to kill children. I have not insulted you. I clearly stated why I voted the way I did and abortion did not factor into it. Lets face it the president can be pro-life it does not mean roe v wade will be overturned. Wasn’t bush pro-life?
Please do not accuse me of wanting to go out and kill children. That is not charitable or kind… I would not say nasty things about you, please respect me the same way.
Cardinal Ratzinger once said that it is permissible to vote for pro-choice candidates so long as you don’t vote for them in support of that pro-choice position. Don’t let people try to make you feel guilty or in the wrong for your informed choice. 49% of Catholics voted the same way.That isn’t very nice. I did not vote to kill children. I have not insulted you. I clearly stated why I voted the way I did and abortion did not factor into it. Lets face it the president can be pro-life it does not mean roe v wade will be overturned. Wasn’t bush pro-life? Please do not accuse me of wanting to go out and kill children. That is not charitable or kind… I would not say nasty things about you, please respect me the same way.
And they will be young & find mystery things in the Constitution aren’t really there like gay marriage.The thing that bothers me most is that, with an Obama win, he will likely get to nominate a couple of Supreme Court justices.![]()
This post is very uncharitable.You voted your conscience and it’s grand to vote for some person who voted for Infanticide like Obama, be proud of yourself.
Cardinal Ratzinger once said that it is permissible to vote for pro-choice candidates so long as you don’t vote for them in support of that pro-choice position. Don’t let people try to make you feel guilty or in the wrong for your informed choice. 49% of Catholics voted the same way.![]()
Cardinal Ratzinger once said that it is permissible to vote for pro-choice candidates so long as you don’t vote for them in support of that pro-choice position. Don’t let people try to make you feel guilty or in the wrong for your informed choice. 49% of Catholics voted the same way.![]()
I agree. I haven’t given up on a Romney victory yet but if he loses its not due to a media conspiracy or a poor Romney campaign or a random storm hitting the Atlantic coast. Its because the majority of people in this country thinks Obama would be a better President.It will be fine. Neither side received a mandate. Life will go on, no huge legislative moves like Obamacare will be coming. Obamacare will probably even be adjusted a bit either now or in 4 years.
Say waaaaaat?Cardinal Ratzinger once said that it is permissible to vote for pro-choice candidates so long as you don’t vote for them in support of that pro-choice position. Don’t let people try to make you feel guilty or in the wrong for your informed choice. 49% of Catholics voted the same way.![]()
And he might have the chance to appoint two very liberal Supreme Court Justices.Umemployment will be worse… and insurance costs will go up.
Which makes me fear for the future of this country.I agree. I haven’t given up on a Romney victory yet but if he loses its not due to a media conspiracy or a poor Romney campaign or a random storm hitting the Atlantic coast. Its because the majority of people in this country thinks Obama would be a better President.
He doesn’t have a problem with babies. He does not actively want abortions to take place. Don’t forget that he has two children, who he quite obviously loves very much.
Let’s just toss what the Church has said on the matter in the last month or so, while we’re at it. That Obama? Nice feller. Bit of a problem with babies, but hey.
Originally Posted by exoflaremy question you responded to
A grab bag of clergy isn’t “the Church” and, frankly, I think the stated position of the head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of The Faith and now Pope has more weight.Let’s just toss what the Church has said on the matter in the last month or so, while we’re at it.
Insurance costs have already gone up. But people will pressure congress to make fixes, and congress if they get nervous will make those fixes.Umemployment will be worse… and insurance costs will go up.
I’ll pass on the Kool-aid, thanks.He doesn’t have a problem with babies. He does not actively want abortions to take place. Don’t forget that he has two children, who he quite obviously loves very much.