C
CoffeeFanatic
Guest
How often does any pope speak ex cathedra though? I thought it was done rather infrequently.
On the one hand we have the right and duty of every Catholic to question a pronouncement which seems to be contrary to Sacred Tradition, and alternatively a reluctance to be divisive or accused of fomenting a schism. In the case of the Dubia the Cardinals were quite right IMHO to ask questions and expect answers which were not forthcoming. I cannot imagine the faithful disciples asking the Lord a question involving the salvation of souls to be met with a resounding silence .Cardinal Burke and Mueller thought the same with the dubia asking for clarification regarding *Amoris Laetitia.
You might say that. Since the dogma was explicitly defined at the First Vatican Counsel it’s been invoked only once, in 1950 when Pius XII defined the Assumption of Mary as infallible doctrine. There have been other examples where it appears set without an explicit declaration, as when three consecutive popes declared the use of artificial birth control as sinful. That is now considered by most Catholic theologians to be an infallible doctrine for this reason, without the pope speaking ex cathedra on the subject.How often does any pope speak ex cathedra though? I thought it was done rather infrequently.
Saint Peter , the first Pope denied the Lord and later repented . We also know that during his papacy he made at least one error of judgement … And he was
humble enough to accept correction.
Vatican II ushered in this identity.The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind’s judge on the last day.
Does anyone else here believe a truism that what a nation has done to Israel will be done to it in return?
“Do to others whatever you would have them do to you This is the law and the prophets." Matthew 7:12
That knife cuts both ways. During the Obama years I freaked out a goodly number of my Protestant friends by doing some calculations one Friday night. This was when Obama was trying to force Israel to give up more of its land to create a state of Palestine. I figured out that if Obama was able to strong-arm Israel into this deal, Israel would be giving up about 24% of its land area.I hope that the truism is bona fide and that Our Blessed Lord sees America’s modest contribution by two of its citizens in the 1948 rebirth of Israel as worthy of His Tender Mercies…