Code:
the ordinances of the church functioning as sacraments, infant baptism, confession of sin to a priest, purgatory, indulgences,
We find all these in scripture, because we are not reading it with anti-Catholic glasses.
always_gr8ful;5107907:
or the equal authority of church tradition and Scripture?
2 Thess 2:15
15 So then, brethren, stand firm and hold to the traditions which you were taught by us, either by word of mouth or by letter.
The marvel is how it came to be that the traditions that came by word of mouth somehow lost their value to those who rebelled against the authority appointed by Christ.
Speaking of marveling - I marvel that the wall of scripture snippets you posted will go unread in context by you and your fellow Catholics, whereby you might see that you are actually making a case against
yourself.
Is this one of those “I only post scripture, not my own opinion” examples?
You are making prejudiced assumptions about Catholics.
I would say that holding traditions and outside teaching OVER the very Word of God is more than a “shortcoming”.
And you would be right. Where you are not right is thinking that the Word of God is confined to the pages of Scripture.
1 Thess 2:13
13 And we also thank God constantly for this, that when you received the word of God which you heard from us, you accepted it not as the word of men but as what it really is, the word of God, which is at work in you believers.
The Word of God received by the Church did not cease to be at work in the believers when some of it was committed to writing.
Maybe it’s because y’all are always fighting for your traditions that you don’t know there is Truth that is complete and perfect on it’s own. I absolutely PRAISE the new Pope for telling y’all it’s ok to study the Bible.
There is Truth that is complete and perfect. His name is Jesus. His Truth He committed to the Church,a nd the Church has preserved it. This was accomplished by the infallible power of the HS, who is the Soul of the Church.
The Bible isn’t a compilation of books brought together by man. If it was, it would be so full of errors, both historically and figuratively and would have failed as the Word of God centuries ago. But it’s not full of errors, it’s perfect, and it’sperfect because His Word is exactly the way He wanted it.
It seems that you know very little about the history of your faith, always. Indeed, the Bible is most certainly a collection of books brought together by man. These men belonged to theApostolic Succession that you have denied, those who preserved those writings for 400 years until they were canonized into the Bible. These men were inspired by the HS, to choose the inerrent books from among 400+ works floating about at the time, claiming to be inspired.
You are wrong, the fact that God uses men to accomplish the infallible does not mean the results are “full of errors”.
2 Peter 1:21
21 because no prophecy ever came by the impulse of man, but men moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God.
When men are moved by the HS, and speak from God, the results are always inerrant and infallble. Such was the decision of the Church when she chose the books that God inspired. You are right, though, the Scriptures are exactly as He desired. Which begs the question why the Reformers felt it necessary to change them.
Do you actually believe that God is so weak that He is unable to move man to put the scriptures together in book form - the very scriptures He breathed? The very God who came to earth in the form of a man to die for you?
On the contrary, this is exactly what we believe. We further believe that God is able to preserve His word in the Church, just as He promised, whether by word of mouth, or in writing.
I would pray not!!
Do y’all even have a clue how serious this is?
Is that why you are here gr8ful? Are you here to inform us you are praying that you will never become Catholic, and that being Catholic is a “serious” error?