Evolution and Darwin against Religion and God

  • Thread starter Thread starter John121
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Refreshing. Do the same caveats apply to historical claims?
Of course. You do not know the names of all of Adam and Eve’s grandchildren. You have incomplete knowledge, just like science. There are large gaps in the history of the initial human colonisation of Australia, so again there is incomplete knowledge.

Science knows that it is incomplete, which is why all scientific theories might be replaced or adjusted when new facts are discovered.
 
That is why evolutionary predictions almost always come with caveats. We cannot know all the (name removed by moderator)uts.
Refreshing. Do the same caveats apply to historical claims?
Of course.
Again, refreshing.

Please remind others who post evolution’s claims as if they were eternal truths that this branch of organized knowledge has a future. A future it would not have if their claims about what is true or false were final and incorrigible.
 
The theory of evolution is a fact, not a truth, and it doesn’t claim to be a complete explanation. It’s very very good at what it does explain though and it’s presictions have been reproduced countless times.
 
It can’t. Bacteria can exchange bits of genetic material between each other. So can viruses. There is no way to predict the end result. None. That is why drug discovery is still trial and error. That is why the drugs advertised on TV have serious, even deadly, side effects.
 
I hope you are referring to microevolution. That can be observed. Macroevolution cannot be observed because humans would have live for millions of years to watch the occurrence. To claim evolution on that scale is fact is simply incorrect.
 
There’s no difference between “macro” and “micro” evolution though, it’s literally the same process.

And there is literally an intensive fossil record dating back billions of year showing evolution occurs over long periods of time.

Evolution happens whether you like it or not. Is biology not taught in schools anymore?
 
Last edited:
Are you saying microevolution is only macroevolution happening gradually?
 
There are no monkeys in that image, nor is that image even accurate as to how human evolution occurred.
 
Another lie. I’m not spending any time in the atheist/Communist reeducation camp.
 
Are you another one of those “intelligent design” conspiracy theorists?
 
Evolution has no practical scientific use. That is why scientists are now forced to take the genome apart to actually learn something useful. They are using various tools to do that.

 
Science doesn’t need a practical purpose for it to be valid.

Evolution happens whether you like it or not.

I don’t think you know what the theory of evolution is.
 
More baloney. Scientists do not use evolution for anything. They can only deal with what’s alive right now.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top