Okay.
Theories of evolution do not necessarily contradict the witness of Scripture, as Pope John Paul II clearly noted.
No, rather evolution and a particular interpretation of the Bible may be incompatible. That’s quite a different matter, however.
so do you think Darwin is reliable and acceptable and Creationists are not ? - twinc
Do you mean to suggest that if the Bible is twisted then a certain interpretation to suit and made to fit can be made and should be made compatible to real[Godless] Evolution. Tell us then how we should set out to do just that - btw let us first see what real evolutionist have to say about what you are suggesting on their behalf and then hopefully you will think again.It seems to me that real Evolutionists want nothing to do with phony/pseudo Christian evolutionists and seemingly neither does God - twinc
contd - some may wish to compromise with real evolutionists,but they do not ! The editor of American Atheist,1988,wrote “when the theory of evolution was advanced,that was the date that the Judeo-Christian relogion began the decline in which it now finds itself in the West.The two theories are point-blank in contradiction one to the other.Any scientists,any educators,any religious persons who state to you that there is no conflict simply want to hang on to both worlds because they have not been able to divest themselves of the infantile belief system which was programmed into them when they were children.They want a foot in each camp.Religion is their emotional security blanket.Science is facing a world of reality which - in the final analysis - they cannot face.They are too cowardly to see religion should be abandoned so they stand there one foot in and one foot out”[Daylight No.23] - more later - twinc
I’m not sure what you mean by “real evolution” (is this as opposed to “fake evolution”…?). I am a real evolutionsist in that I hold organic evolution to be the best scientific explanation for the various life forms on earth. I’m also a real creationsist in that I believe in the Christian doctrine that God is the Creator of all things besides himself.
Not sure what this even means. Evolution is evolution. There’s no such thing as “Christian evolution,” any more than there’s such a thing as “Christian gravitation” or “Christian photosynthesis.”
Oh, my. You’ve actually bought into Sungenis’s demonstrative nonsense. Well, this explains much. Take care, now.
and then
So you are saying Atheists know more about what christianity stands for than the Pope? Yeowch…
are you saying the Pope is a real[Godless]Evolutionist - lol,lol - with one foot in each camp and too cowardly to see religion should be abandoned so he stands there one foot in and one foot out and also unable to divest himself of the infantile belief system programmed into him as a child - come now be reasonable - twinc
what this explains is that you are not prepared to accept what the Church has always taught and teaches and also that you did not seem to gather this from www.ScriptureCatholic.com - so take care now lest you contend and contest against God and His Church and not against me - btw do as I do as advised by Pope Pius XII in “humani generis”,consult the experts and specialists who have been researching and discussing as per humani generis - go to www.kolbecenter.org - twinc
I didn’t say that, you twisted my words, and mocked me. You say you are catholic, then you say that to believe in theistic evolution shows a lack of knowledge about christianity. The Pope has said that this is not true, and has said that theistic evolution is NOT against scripture. This was the point I was making.
Are you serious?
very much so,so how about you - twinc
You believe the sun, planets, and all other such revolve around the earth?
Not at all. I’m simply not prepared to accept Sungenis’s opinion regarding “what the Church has (supposedly) always taught.” Big difference, there.
As already posted, and to which you’ve yet to reply: