S
Scotty_PGH
Guest
It offends the modernist’s sensibilities, and that is a GOOD thing for the Church!While the complex looks nice enough from the outside, the inside looks gauche to me.
It offends the modernist’s sensibilities, and that is a GOOD thing for the Church!While the complex looks nice enough from the outside, the inside looks gauche to me.
Not this again…
The answer is that we must give God our best in all ways. To say that worshipping Him in a worthy manner detracts from living in His presence in everyday life is one of the most laughable things I have ever heard.
Just as it would be hyprocritcal to give God honor through a beautiful Liturgy, with ornate vestments and grand churches while neglecting our duties to the doctrines of the Church, it is also hypocritical to perform those duties while neglecting the proper worship of God.
We give God our best. And this extends into the Mass. Read the scripture relevant to Solomon’s Temple.
It has nothing whatsoever to do with modernism. You’re injecting an obvious red herring.It offends the modernist’s sensibilities, and that is a GOOD thing for the Church!
I certainly agree with this.Not this again…
The answer is that we must give God our best in all ways. To say that worshipping Him in a worthy manner detracts from living in His presence in everyday life is one of the most laughable things I have ever heard.
Just as it would be hyprocritcal to give God honor through a beautiful Liturgy, with ornate vestments and grand churches while neglecting our duties to the doctrines of the Church, it is also hypocritical to perform those duties while neglecting the proper worship of God.
We give God our best. And this extends into the Mass. Read the scripture relevant to Solomon’s Temple.
Not at all. It offends those with taste and a sense of tradition.It offends the modernist’s sensibilities, and that is a GOOD thing for the Church!
The tradition of Cranmer, perhaps.Not at all. It offends those with taste and a sense of tradition.
Perhaps it does to you, based on your own personal taste. That in no way proves your assertion though.It has nothing whatsoever to do with modernism. You’re injecting an obvious red herring.
Some may consider the church to be overdone (I prefer Byzantine or Romanesque), but it certainly surpasses most other worship spaces constructed at about the same time. I love the fact that the interior of the tablernacle is solidly encrusted with diamonds for the Eucharistic King. No one sees it, but Him.
Because it gives Him our absolute best.Perhaps it does to you, based on your own personal taste. That in no way proves your assertion though.
Diamonds, huh? God made plenty of them. But a guy named Cecil Rhodes (the guy behind DeBeers Consolidated Mines and the former Rhodesia) gained control of the best diamond mines (using slave labor) and put an artificial hammerlock on their supply while creating one of the best marketing campaigns ever – “a diamond is forever” (in an attempt to quell used diamond sales) artificially driving their price through the roof.
And lining a tabernacle with diamonds pleases God? How?
Kings presenting God with Frankincense, gold and myrrh pleased him how?Perhaps it does to you, based on your own personal taste. That in no way proves your assertion though.
Diamonds, huh? God made plenty of them. But a guy named Cecil Rhodes (the guy behind DeBeers Consolidated Mines and the former Rhodesia) gained control of the best diamond mines (using slave labor) and put an artificial hammerlock on their supply while creating one of the best marketing campaigns ever – “a diamond is forever” (in an attempt to quell used diamond sales) artificially driving their price through the roof.
And lining a tabernacle with diamonds pleases God? How?
I’m not an iconoclast, but I know gauche design when I see it. The interior of that building is catalog-architecture at its worst.The tradition of Cranmer, perhaps.
St. Peter’s Basilica must really turn your stomach too then.I’m not an iconoclast, but I know gauche design when I see it. The interior of that building is catalog-architecture at its worst.
Gold has intrinsic value. So does incense. Outside of its use as a cutting abrasive, diamonds have little, were it not for Mr. Rhodes.Kings presenting God with Frankincense, gold and myrrh pleased him how?
That Hanceville shrine is no St. Peter’s Basilica. St. Pete’s is not a product of catalog-architecture, or poor taste.St. Peter’s Basilica must really turn your stomach too then.
Diamond’s ain’t God’s best unless we use their artificially inflated market price as the gauge.Because it gives Him our absolute best.
I have to agree that that… thing they lowered at the end of Mass to reveal the blessed sacrament was a bit tacky, but I don’t really feel that anything there is too mismatched. There’s a bit too much white for my taste - I feel it contrasts badly with the dark mahogany, but other than that I think it looks great…I’m not an iconoclast, but I know gauche design when I see it. The interior of that building is catalog-architecture at its worst.
The point is that we value them and we give them up entirely to him. I’m sure he’s touched by it (if God can be touched).Diamond’s ain’t God’s best unless we use their artificially inflated market price as the gauge.
You’ll notice I never commented on the price, or the workmanship. Just the design. More specifically the floor and the furnishings.I have to agree that that… thing they lowered at the end of Mass to reveal the blessed sacrament was a bit tacky, but I don’t really feel that anything there is too mismatched. There’s a bit too much white for my taste - I feel it contrasts badly with the dark mahogany, but other than that I think it looks great…
That’s where you are wrong. It’s not thoughtfully designed. It pulls together many very expensive furnishings in a very disjointed and non-harmonious manner. This is not a matter of poor style (traditional or otherwise) but a matter of abysmal execution.Everything about that Shrine’s design is thoroughly and traditionally Catholic. If it looks gauche or weird to some people, it’s because they are used to seeing very un-Catholic structures posing as Catholic for far too long.