P
ProVobis
Guest
Thanks for the honesty but what’s your point?…I’d prefer the Church to move away from the more conservative elements among the hierarchy.
Thanks for the honesty but what’s your point?…I’d prefer the Church to move away from the more conservative elements among the hierarchy.
So would 40,000 Protestant denominations and most of the non-Catholic world. Why exactly would you want the Church to move away from conservatism?I’m merely agreeing with the EmporerNapoleon.
Aside from whatever Cardinal Burke has to say, I’d prefer the Church to move away from the more conservative elements among the hierarchy.
Cardinal Burke** IS** clergy.No one is personally attacking clergy.
It would go off topic.So would 40,000 Protestant denominations and most of the non-Catholic world. Why exactly would you want the Church to move away from conservatism?
And no one is personally attacking him.Cardinal Burke** IS** clergy.
And move into what? Seems like we’re already far removed from Trent.… I’d prefer the Church to move away from the more conservative elements among the hierarchy.
Instead of open ended questions, most of the questions imply an answer that they expect.Um, what does the word “leading” mean in this case?
If I assume that the conservatism being spoken of is not political, then it is inevitable that any move is away from conservatism, including any doctrinal development (like the Assumption of Mary). Every Ecumenical Council needed an element of movement. Conservative theology ( to conserve the status quo) limits the degree to which the Church can grow. This is a good thing when the growth is toward error. However, to much can leave the Church stagnant and ineffective.So would 40,000 Protestant denominations and most of the non-Catholic world. Why exactly would you want the Church to move away from conservatism?
Pope Francis himself called for “candor and urged the bishops to speak openly and clearly, without fear of censure.” (That’s a quote, btw.) Cardinal Burke, as the embodiment of conservatism, has unwittingly caused ire and is now being** falsely **accused of dissenting by merely defending the unchangeable.It seems to me that if someone is going to constantly muddy the waters by publicly dissenting from the Pope and then talk about confusion spreading among the laity then one does not have to look too far for the cause.![]()
I do not see too many objecting against orthodoxy, especially among Catholics. I really think all the bishops are pretty much orthodox, even when the do not agree.I am still trying to understand the fundamental cause for the elevated animosity directed toward all things orthodox and traditional.
Do you mean Pope John XXIII? Do you have a link for thisP.S. For a prominent example of a pope teaching error outside of Dogmatic proclamations we have Pope John XXII, who erroneously taught that the blessed did not see the beatific vision until the general judgement; he later recanted and taught that the opposite was true when his error was braught to his attention.
Try the comments sections of the articles (hit pieces) at Crux, NCR, and America Mag. You will find all of the animosity towards Orthodoxy you would ever wish to see from “practicing” Catholics. Lets just be honest about this entire issue, there are progressive Catholics pinning their hopes on the Synod. There are Orthodox Catholics worried the progressives may be right. We have clergy giving opinions on both sides of the issue fanning the debate. This is not the 19th century where decisions from Rome take years to filter down to the pews. Our imstant access to information, acurate or not, keeps the pot stirred up. Many are leveraging the media to advance their own agenda, on both sides. This is a mess the Church did not need at this point in time. I am simply praying for God’s Will to prevail. And for the decernment to know the truth.I do not see too many objecting against orthodoxy, especially among Catholics. I really think all the bishops are pretty much orthodox, even when the do not agree.
Progressive and orthodox are no more mutually exclusive than traditional and orthodox. Pope John Paul VI even named an encyclical for being progressive.Try the comments sections of the articles (hit pieces) at Crux, NCR, and America Mag. You will find all of the animosity towards Orthodoxy you would ever wish to see from “practicing” Catholics. Lets just be honest about this entire issue, there are progressive Catholics pinning their hopes on the Synod. There are Orthodox Catholics worried the progressives may be right. We have clergy giving opinions on both sides of the issue fanning the debate. This is not the 19th century where decisions from Rome take years to filter down to the pews. Our imstant access to information, acurate or not, keeps the pot stirred up. Many are leveraging the media to advance their own agenda, on both sides. This is a mess the Church did not need at this point in time. I am simply praying for God’s Will to prevail. And for the decernment to know the truth.
Have a blessed Holy Week.
I think that’s an accurate description of what’s been happening.Try the comments sections of the articles (hit pieces) at Crux, NCR, and America Mag. You will find all of the animosity towards Orthodoxy you would ever wish to see from “practicing” Catholics. Lets just be honest about this entire issue, there are progressive Catholics pinning their hopes on the Synod. There are Orthodox Catholics worried the progressives may be right. We have clergy giving opinions on both sides of the issue fanning the debate. This is not the 19th century where decisions from Rome take years to filter down to the pews. Our imstant access to information, acurate or not, keeps the pot stirred up. Many are leveraging the media to advance their own agenda, on both sides. This is a mess the Church did not need at this point in time. I am simply praying for God’s Will to prevail. And for the decernment to know the truth.
Have a blessed Holy Week.
I don’t recall St. John XXIII “recanting” anything. My guess would be that John XXII was the correct citation.Do you mean Pope John XXIII? Do you have a link for this![]()
This seems to diverge a great deal from the comments coming from participants at the synod. There seems to be a staggering degree of disagreement between the bishops on these topics and it hardly seems likely that bishops who have completely opposite positions on doctrinal issues can all be considered orthodox. What else would account for the confusion Burke alluded to?I really think all the bishops are pretty much orthodox, even when the do not agree.
As long as the bishops agree on doctrine, I think they can all be considered orthodox. And as long as they are just brain storming, where all angles are considered, all the bishops should be considered orthodox (maybe some of the suggestions could be considered unorthodox… but that is kind of the definition of ‘thinking outside the box’ … right?)This seems to diverge a great deal from the comments coming from participants at the synod. There seems to be a staggering degree of disagreement between the bishops on these topics and it hardly seems likely that bishops who have completely opposite positions on doctrinal issues can all be considered orthodox. What else would account for the confusion Burke alluded to?
Ender
Pope John XXII canonized Thomas Aquinas. I actually think he meant Pope John XII. However, I will let him speak for himself.I don’t recall St. John XXIII “recanting” anything. My guess would be that John XXII was the correct citation.