Yes he did. I would ask, how would ending or destabilizing a second union that has produced children, not scandalize, and in fact traumatize, those children any less than seeing, in certain cases, their parents receive the Eucharist?
Except that in the case of the Church, prelates like Cardinal Burke have not been teaching anything other than what the Catholic Church ‘sells’
How is the rejection of sin ‘destabilizing’? Is the relationship based on sin? If so, how is that a healthy relationship?
That doesn’t prove much since those suffering legalism use this claim.Except that in the case of the Church, prelates like Cardinal Burke have not been teaching anything other than what the Catholic Church ‘sells’
Everything +Burke has been saying is straight from the product lineup.
It seems some people won’t take anything short of communion as an answer.
Except, throwing your boss under the bus is not a really workable manner in which to get your point across. Pope Francis seems to understand what the world needs right now - Hope and honest discussion about living in 2015.Except that in the case of the Church, prelates like Cardinal Burke have not been teaching anything other than what the Catholic Church ‘sells’
Everything +Burke has been saying is straight from the product lineup.
Under the bus? I believe the Pope called this kind of talk “gossip.”
Many people taught their children that babies that die without baptism go straight to heaven prior to the official change in Church teaching in 1992. Did that scandalise children?
Scandal is bad example. How is that kind of teaching setting a bad example? It’s just expressing a belief, which btw, seems to be ever changing. Is there an infallible statement on this?
The reason that the current traditionalists still demand that Limbo is essential teaching is to protect the doctrine of original sin and the need for baptism. They say it undermines the teaching on original sin. Scandalous.
Is what I stated incorrect? If so, what exactly has Cardinal Burke taught that he has not supported with actual Church teaching?
Where exactly has he thereon the pope under the bus? And how is his discussion in anyway not honest, which is exactly what the pipe has called for? The messages account adultery are from the Gospel itself, which is the SOURCE of Hope, and thus scale what the pope has called forExcept, throwing your boss under the bus is not a really workable manner in which to get your point across. Pope Francis seems to understand what the world needs right now - Hope and honest discussion about living in 2015.
Except that in the case of the Church, prelates like Cardinal Burke have not been teaching anything other than what the Catholic Church ‘sells’
Everything +Burke has been saying is straight from the product lineup.
I don’t believe Limbo is a real place but is there an infallible statement that is being challenged to form a basis for scandal? But presuming it is scandalous, and I’m not saying it is, they shouldn’t be receiving communion either.
Everything he says is supported by Church teaching, which is why the people that criticize him tend not to address the content of what he says; there isn’t really anything they can say.
In Pauls teaching to the Corinthians 2Cor3:4-6 he explains…
Then why produce it?
That same Paul also said not to approach the Eucharist unworthily…
Limbo was taught as an essential part of the doctrine of Original Sin and baptism. It was not presented as a mere hypothesis that the faithful could take or leave. It was thought to be an unchangable part of doctrine. These very strict present day Catholics such as the fatima.org and Catholic Essential crowd… I don’t think it is allowed to post links… claim statements like that of Pope Pius VI…