Explosions near finish line of Boston Marathon

  • Thread starter Thread starter BroomWagon
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Whomever it turns out to be , someone will exploit it and well lose rights in exchange for feeling safe…
Many people including the moderators have asked that politics be kept out of this thread.
 
Everyone, can we please keep this thread on topic. Many people including myself and including the mod for the board have asked several times that politics be kept out of this thread, now we don’t just have politics, we have the gun control debate coming back up. This is not the place for it.
 
Shucks. CNN had someone on his way to court. Now they’re saying that everything we know is wrong. Best to wait until the official press conference.
Yep a lot of conflicting reports…maybe they took him for a black helicopter ride to Cuba…
 
I was under the crazy impression that most liberals, as well as conservatives, want the guilty party to be apprehended, whoever he or she may be.
Not according to some people:
It will probably be much different if the bomber ends up being a Muslim and/or a foreigner from the developing world. As we know from our own history, when those kind of individuals break laws in such a high-profile way, America often cites them as both proof that entire demographic groups must be targeted, and that therefore a more systemic response is warranted. At that point, it’s easy to imagine conservatives citing Boston as a reason to block immigration reform defense spending cuts and the Afghan War withdrawal and to further expand surveillance and other encroachments on civil liberties.
It would appear that Salon doesn’t want the person caught if he isn’t a white male and being an anti-government extremist would be a bonus.
 
Not according to some people: It would appear that Salon doesn’t want the person caught if he isn’t a white male and being an anti-government extremist would be a bonus.
Light skinned male with hood. Not sure in 2013 what that means?
 
Everyone, can we please keep this thread on topic. Many people including myself and including the mod for the board have asked several times that politics be kept out of this thread, now we don’t just have politics, we have the gun control debate coming back up. This is not the place for it.
This is related to the gun debate since it has to do with terrorism and the debate over what can or can’t stop terrorism. The rules that I’ve seen say that the news section of CAF is the only place where political discussions are allowed.
 
I’m sure there’ll be very cautious in name and identity; nobody wants another Richard Jewell.
 
Some of those suggestions are already being done, though there are a limited number of prosecutors, etc… Some of them are unconstitutional, and will never be done, unless the Constitution is amended, or the courts reverse themselves. At least one is not very practical. Just how would you cut off “sanctuary” states? How would you determine which ones they are?
As to sanctuary states- those that have stated a policy of ignoring the immigration status of folks in the US. Many cities actually have formal statements declaring themselves to be sanctuaries.

You are right about the courts, do all the rights of a citizen apply to non-citizens? Why is it unconstitutional to ask for ID and act upon it? Is it ok if it is done for everyone vice based on an officer’s suspicions? Courts have ruled both ways.

Lots of cars in my area with Mexican plates, doesn’t bother me because I think, perhaps wrongly, that to be here they must have had to show their ID and have it verified by somebody when they crossed into the US.

Not an easy issue, but it is a reality we have to deal with vice pretending it isn’t a factor. I have no idea whether this will turn out to have been exploited in the Boston incident. Probably not, it’s only been a proven factor in one terrorist plot that I’m aware of- which wasn’t successful. But it is a vulnerablity.
 
I’m sure there’ll be very cautious in name and identity; nobody wants another Richard Jewell.
US Attorney just said that no arrest has been made and no one is in custody (per Fox via the Boston Globe).
 
Liberals are hoping it won’t be a Muslim. But if it is they have a standard procedure of ignoring that fact.
Please explain why you think that “liberals” are hoping that it will not be a Muslim. I don’t understand your point.
 
US Attorney just said that no arrest has been made and no one is in custody (per Fox via the Boston Globe).
These are all just unconfirmed reports, same which CNN is reporting with much spin and speculation.
 
Please explain why you think that “liberals” are hoping that it will not be a Muslim. I don’t understand your point.
Because they put it in print?
Le**t’s hope the Boston Marathon bomber is a white American **
“White privilege is knowing that even if the bomber turns out to be white, no one will call for your group to be profiled as terrorists as a result, subjected to special screening or threatened with deportation,” writes author Tim Wise. “White privilege is knowing that if this bomber turns out to be white, the United States government will not bomb whatever corn field or mountain town or stale suburb from which said bomber came, just to ensure that others like him or her don’t get any ideas. And if he turns out to be a member of the Irish Republican Army we won’t bomb Dublin. And if he’s an Italian-American Catholic we won’t bomb the Vatican.”
 
Justice Dept, No Arrest, No-One in custody, Basically it sounds like they have a photo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top