C
CatholicGeek1
Guest
Many people including the moderators have asked that politics be kept out of this thread.Whomever it turns out to be , someone will exploit it and well lose rights in exchange for feeling safe…
Many people including the moderators have asked that politics be kept out of this thread.Whomever it turns out to be , someone will exploit it and well lose rights in exchange for feeling safe…
Yep a lot of conflicting reports…maybe they took him for a black helicopter ride to Cuba…Shucks. CNN had someone on his way to court. Now they’re saying that everything we know is wrong. Best to wait until the official press conference.
Only Pressure cookers, BBs and Shrapnel. aka [scrap metal]What about the materials that one can use to make a bomb? Should those be banned?
Not according to some people:I was under the crazy impression that most liberals, as well as conservatives, want the guilty party to be apprehended, whoever he or she may be.
It will probably be much different if the bomber ends up being a Muslim and/or a foreigner from the developing world. As we know from our own history, when those kind of individuals break laws in such a high-profile way, America often cites them as both proof that entire demographic groups must be targeted, and that therefore a more systemic response is warranted. At that point, it’s easy to imagine conservatives citing Boston as a reason to block immigration reform defense spending cuts and the Afghan War withdrawal and to further expand surveillance and other encroachments on civil liberties.
It would appear that Salon doesn’t want the person caught if he isn’t a white male and being an anti-government extremist would be a bonus.
A simple gas bomb (any Toyota will do) is more dangerous than what was seen in Boston.Only Pressure cookers, BBs and Shrapnel. aka [scrap metal]Dangerous stuff when crazy people have access.
![]()
The President wasn’t politicizing it, he was discussing a possible motive.![]()
By blaming his opponents? Naw, nothing political at all about that…
Please, quit insulting people.
Light skinned male with hood. Not sure in 2013 what that means?Not according to some people: It would appear that Salon doesn’t want the person caught if he isn’t a white male and being an anti-government extremist would be a bonus.
You left out nails.Only Pressure cookers, BBs and Shrapnel. aka [scrap metal]Dangerous stuff when crazy people have access.
![]()
This is related to the gun debate since it has to do with terrorism and the debate over what can or can’t stop terrorism. The rules that I’ve seen say that the news section of CAF is the only place where political discussions are allowed.Everyone, can we please keep this thread on topic. Many people including myself and including the mod for the board have asked several times that politics be kept out of this thread, now we don’t just have politics, we have the gun control debate coming back up. This is not the place for it.
MSNBC and NBC News, Brian Williams, had mentioned conflicting reports and was not ready to say one way or the other whether an arrest had been made. CNN obviously jumped the gun, so to speak.CNN is now backtracking and saying that no arrest has been made.
As to sanctuary states- those that have stated a policy of ignoring the immigration status of folks in the US. Many cities actually have formal statements declaring themselves to be sanctuaries.Some of those suggestions are already being done, though there are a limited number of prosecutors, etc… Some of them are unconstitutional, and will never be done, unless the Constitution is amended, or the courts reverse themselves. At least one is not very practical. Just how would you cut off “sanctuary” states? How would you determine which ones they are?
US Attorney just said that no arrest has been made and no one is in custody (per Fox via the Boston Globe).I’m sure there’ll be very cautious in name and identity; nobody wants another Richard Jewell.
Please explain why you think that “liberals” are hoping that it will not be a Muslim. I don’t understand your point.Liberals are hoping it won’t be a Muslim. But if it is they have a standard procedure of ignoring that fact.
These are all just unconfirmed reports, same which CNN is reporting with much spin and speculation.US Attorney just said that no arrest has been made and no one is in custody (per Fox via the Boston Globe).
Because they put it in print?Please explain why you think that “liberals” are hoping that it will not be a Muslim. I don’t understand your point.
Le**t’s hope the Boston Marathon bomber is a white American **
“White privilege is knowing that even if the bomber turns out to be white, no one will call for your group to be profiled as terrorists as a result, subjected to special screening or threatened with deportation,” writes author Tim Wise. “White privilege is knowing that if this bomber turns out to be white, the United States government will not bomb whatever corn field or mountain town or stale suburb from which said bomber came, just to ensure that others like him or her don’t get any ideas. And if he turns out to be a member of the Irish Republican Army we won’t bomb Dublin. And if he’s an Italian-American Catholic we won’t bomb the Vatican.”
Therefore it stands to reason that most liberals, both politicians and regular citizens, agree with this?Because they put it in print?