Explosive Revelations about Homosexual Teachers in Canadian Catholic Schools

  • Thread starter Thread starter childofmary1143
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
To tell you the truth, it’s not surprising. Sad, but not surprising. The Catholic education and morality in Canada is much worse off than it is here. And it’s pretty bad over here.
 
Vision said:
To tell you the truth, it’s not surprising. Sad, but not surprising. The Catholic education and morality in Canada is much worse off than it is here. And it’s pretty bad over here.
Click to expand...
no better or worse than in the US
 
but a bad role model for children and can lead to sexual abuse including the advocating their sexual immoralities to the children.
 
I agree that they should not be teachers but just what other jobs should they not hold? For example, if they work retail they are mostly going to be around the youth so should we ban them from that? How far does this go before we say they can’t hold any job and therefore can’t make a living?
 
goofyjim said:
I agree that they should not be teachers but just what other jobs should they not hold? For example, if they work retail they are mostly going to be around the youth so should we ban them from that? How far does this go before we say they can’t hold any job and therefore can’t make a living?
Click to expand...
Well lets follow what our Catholic faith says. It says nothing about retail but how can students learn about the faith if the teachers who teach it are not LIVING it.
 
goofyjim said:
I agree that they should not be teachers but just what other jobs should they not hold? For example, if they work retail they are mostly going to be around the youth so should we ban them from that? How far does this go before we say they can’t hold any job and therefore can’t make a living?
Click to expand...
The Church guides us in matters of faith and morals. Retail work doesn’t involve the formation of either. Having a lesbian teacher tell her classroom of children that she is “married” to another woman and that’s O.K. affects children far more than the lesbian manager at the Gap who says the same thing.

Cheers,
Cari
 
a person’s profession has nothing to do with homosexuality/bisexuality. people teach because they want to serve others by sharing what they know and what they can do.

who gave straight people the right to restrain homosexuals from choosing a career they want? they can do more than what the person who mentioned about “retail” can.

it is really unfair to treat homosexuals as minority. in fact, there are more heterosexual terrorists, pro-death penalty advocates, robbers, burglars, rapists, and even AIDS carriers (positiveconnections.org/hidden_majority.htm).

in america, although majority of the male population with AIDS had sex with men, there are more females with AIDS exposed through heterosexual contact (avert.org/statsum.htm).

in the UK, 698 contracted HIV through heterosexual sex…465 were infected by homosexual transmission… across the West Midlands region, 3,644 know they have HIV or Aids… 2,129 are heterosexual… 124 are homosexual (HPA) (see ‘HIV in City Is Up by a Quarter.’ The Birmingham Post (December 1, 2006), 7; see also, ‘Are We Still Dying of Ignorance? 25 Years after the First Cases of Aids Were Identified, Emma Johnson Examines the Issue.’ Daily Post (May 22, 2006), 18.

AIDS cases in asia are predominantly of heterosexual individuals. in thailand, for example, it is “estimated that in 2002, 50% of infections were the result of heterosexual transmission…20% due to injecting drug use; 15% transmitted from mother to child; and 15% were associated with commercial sex” and in myanmar, “up until the end of 2003, 65% were due to heterosexual contact, 26% to injecting drug use, and 5% to contaminated blood.” china and Lao People’s Democratic Republic have similar cases. (see avert.org/aidssoutheastasia.htm).

thus, AIDS is not a homosexual disease but an endemic that strike promiscuous individuals regardless of their sexual orientation.

i studied in a catholic school and i had homosexual teachers. yet they did not show any sign of immorality. the following are my observations in that school (i am referring to some homo/bi teachers and some straight teachers):
  1. they could teach better and more effectively than the straight teachers i had
  2. they are more active in church activities than the straight ones - they teach the choir, they volunteer in the outreach programs of the church, they volunteer as instruments/watchers for clean election…
  3. they are more compassionate than the straight teachers - they are willing to give advices.
  4. they respect their colleagues and students.
  5. they go to church more often than the straight teachers.
while some christian sects despise homosexuality, some are very supportive. would you discourage a person to serve the church because he or she is homosexual? if a priest would talk about anti-homosexuality or campaign against homosexuality during homily, do you think the family members of a gay/lesbian who understand and accept his/her condition would attend the next sunday mass?

**if god did not create homosexuals/bisexuals, there wouldn’t have been any. ** LGBs exist because it’s a natural phenomenon. even before history was realized people regard something new or unusual unacceptable and therefore, it is bad (e.g., bible stories). most people still don’t understand why LGBs exist even if they try to. heterosexuals don’t fall for species of their kind easily or naturally just as lesbians and gays don’t have the tendency to be attracted to opposite gender. wanting heterosexuals to understand this human nature is like asking an ordinary person to explain why skunks stink while other mammals don’t.

homosexuality is not a disease to be treated but a phenomenon that is supposed to be explained so that people may understand, appreciate, and live it. do we have to remind ourselves that every living organism is unique in some way as a result of diversity in nature? even wild animals are given welfare. so why shouldn’t we accept homosexuals and give them the right to live they way it’s supposed to be?

i used to think that people should live according to their ideals – like a woman having a family with a man because it seems perfect. however, i realized that nothing is perfect but imperfection.

do homosexuals have to change to be accepted in the community? why should a person live with a man/woman he/she doesn’t love at all?

*** people pry to cover up their hypocrisy ***
 
goofyjim said:
I agree that they should not be teachers but just what other jobs should they not hold? For example, if they work retail they are mostly going to be around the youth so should we ban them from that? How far does this go before we say they can’t hold any job and therefore can’t make a living?
Click to expand...
I don’t think thier position as teachers is such a bad thing - it’s homosexuals teaching at Catholic schools that is the issue.
 
some catholic schools accept homosexual teachers… they don’t judge people’s sexual orientation but their personality, skills and abilities. if they meet the school’s standards, then they are qualified to teach. they don’t necessasritly have to preach about religion because it’s the task of religion teachers. personal lives should not be talked about in classrooms… mind you, there are actually LGBs who live decent lives than most heterosexuals do. but, unlike politicians, these gays/lesbians don’t rant about the good things they do.
 
maphie said:
** i studied in a catholic school and i had homosexual teachers. yet they did not show any sign of immorality. the following are my observations in that school (i am referring to some homo/bi teachers and some straight teachers):
  1. they could teach better and more effectively than the straight teachers i had
  2. they are more active in church activities than the straight ones - they teach the choir, they volunteer in the outreach programs of the church, they volunteer as instruments/watchers for clean election…
  3. they are more compassionate than the straight teachers - they are willing to give advices.
  4. they respect their colleagues and students.
  5. they go to church more often than the straight teachers.**
How did you know they were homosexual? Did they tell you? Was it common knowledge? Did the adminstrators at this Catholic institution not care? Would you have the same opinion about somebody who volunteered at an abortion clinic? How about somebody that was an athiest? Did the Homosexuals receive communion while going to mass? If so - did it not bother you that they would receive in a state of grave sin (assuming they were active homosexuals)?

I don’t think that anybody has a problem with homosexual teachers. It’s the teaching at Catholic Institutions that’s the issue. How can they - in good concience - express the views of the Church - teach the values of the Church - if they are living a lifestyle that contradicts Catholic Teaching.
Click to expand...
 
i don’t care about people’s personal lives; i care about people’s concern for others - loving, helping, understanding, etc. doing exactly the things opposite to crimes… i’m not in the position to judge or scrutinize others’ sexual activities… if you don’t like them, avoid them instead of thiniking about negative things about them. negative thoughts can lead to anger, anger to resentment, resentment to hatred. hatred is the opposite of love. love is the only way to jesus and the kingdom of heaven… i believed when a priest said in homily that love is more important than hope and faith. in heaven there’s nothing but love. it’s up to you how you live your faith… afterall, we will all be judged

i believe homosexuality does not equate to mortal sin like abortion and killing. committing a sin is on individual basis. didn’t know that homosexuality is the 8th capital sin. and i didn’t know that it is the eleventh commandment not to be gay.

why don’t you write to the pope to order catholic schools not to hire homosexuals? or to your president to expatriate or persecute catholic homosexuals? tell the priests not to baptize homosexual babies. tell them to ban homosexuals from entering your church. perhaps that’s the only way you can be happy.:rolleyes:
 
maphie said:
some catholic schools accept homosexual teachers… they don’t judge people’s sexual orientation but their personality, skills and abilities. if they meet the school’s standards, then they are qualified to teach. they don’t necessasritly have to preach about religion because it’s the task of religion teachers. personal lives should not be talked about in classrooms… mind you, there are actually LGBs who live decent lives than most heterosexuals do. but, unlike politicians, these gays/lesbians don’t rant about the good things they do.
Click to expand...
I agree that there are "LGB"s who live decent lives. For Catholics, that would mean not living an active homosexual lifestyle and that is perfectly fine as a Catholic. Such a person, would not be “outting” him/her self as the OP indicated.

Some Catholic schools, and many private schools, require that their teachers not only have the skills and abilities to be effective teachers but that they are able to serve as good role models for the children they teach. A person living an active gay lifestyle (publically sinning) would not be able to fulfill that part of the job description.

It isn’t really about being “around children”. We don’t expect retail clerks to be role models for our children. Nor do they spend 8 hours a day with our children instilling knowledge and thinking skills.
 
Or you could write the Pope and ask him to change Catholic Teaching. Living a homosexual lifestyle is a mortal sin (read the catachism). It sounds to me as if you have an issue with what the Church teaches.

If you truly feel love for homosexuals (as we all should) then you should pray that they embrace the teaching’s of Christ’s Church, and turn away from living in mortal sin. I think that would be the truly charatible thing to do.

If you knew somebody to be an athiest, would you pray that he sees the error of his way’s, and not embrace Christ’s loving Church, or would you accept him living in darkness, forever not knowing Christ?
 
definitely… that’s why i mentioned personality - which may include attitudes and charactersitis of a person. 🙂
 
Corki said:
I agree that there are "LGB"s who live decent lives. For Catholics, that would mean not living an active homosexual lifestyle and that is perfectly fine as a Catholic. Such a person, would not be “outting” him/her self as the OP indicated.

Some Catholic schools, and many private schools, require that their teachers not only have the skills and abilities to be effective teachers but that they are able to serve as good role models for the children they teach. A person living an active gay lifestyle (publically sinning) would not be able to fulfill that part of the job description.

It isn’t really about being “around children”. We don’t expect retail clerks to be role models for our children. Nor do they spend 8 hours a day with our children instilling knowledge and thinking skills.
Click to expand...
Teachers have to sign a contract that staes that they can be fired for “moral terpitude” (not sure about the spelling). At least that is what my conctact states.
 
i have nothing to do with the church doctrines…who make doctrines? is it god’s own words? did he appear to the person who wrote it? if that’s what they want so be it… excommunicate homosexuals if they want… rule people the way they want…

you claim that homosexuality is an error… who made homosexuals?

are there at least 3 references claiming that only heterosexuals perfectly made and homosexuals are all sinners and don’t have the right to be spiritual by any chance?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top