F.B.I. Raids Office of Trump’s Longtime Lawyer Michael Cohen

  • Thread starter Thread starter lmachine
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I thought this was a violation of “attorney-client privilege”?

I don’t have extensive knowledge in this area and maybe I am wrong??
 
This interesting Fox News video from Judge Napalotino explains why the FBI could have legally raided the office of President Trump’s lawyer, along with other information about this event.
see
 
Last edited:
I’m so over Trump, i just dont care anymore…much of his troubles he has brought on himself.
 
Good question now that I think about it.

Personally I feel for the guy. He doesn’t strike me as a criminal but then still waters run deep.
 
One of the reporters asked the president, “Why don’t you just fire Mueller?”
.
Trump responded, “Well, I think it’s a disgrace what’s going on.
Could some of these guys WANT Trump to fire Mueller just to bring on obstruction of justice charges and a call for impeachment?
 
Last edited:
I assume, though, that’s why Mueller engineered this raid. Looking for a way to make it criminal. NKVD stuff typical of Mueller.
When you make your tin foil hats, do you put the shinny side out, or dull side out? I assume shinny side out, but thought I’d ask.
 
His problems have been created by the people trying anything and everything to oust him.
But a little humility might do a lot for him…we are all called to be Christ like, and maybe facing his enemies with good grace might be the cross Trump needs to carry.
 
40.png
lmachine:
“Today the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York executed a series of search warrants and seized the privileged communications between my client, Michael Cohen, and his clients,” said Stephen Ryan, his lawyer. “I have been advised by federal prosecutors that the New York action is, in part, a referral by the Office of Special Counsel, Robert Mueller.”
If this is true, Mueller should be disbarred without further ado. There is no way he had search warrants to get privileged information.
Attorney-client privilege is not something that is 100% ironclad. According to legal experts, investigators can pierce that protection if they believe the attorney has participated in a fraud or crime with a client.
 
Last edited:
40.png
7_Sorrows:
His problems have been created by the people trying anything and everything to oust him.
But a little humility might do a lot for him…we are all called to be Christ like, and maybe facing his enemies with good grace might be the cross Trump needs to carry.
Using “humility” and “Trump” in the same paragraph wins the oxymoron award for the day! 🏆
 
Last edited:
I thought this was a violation of “attorney-client privilege”?

I don’t have extensive knowledge in this area and maybe I am wrong??
You’re not wrong, raiding an attorney’s office is unusual and requires very serious evidence of wrongdoing as Judge Napolitano says. Privileged information will have been taken in the raids, and now it’s the job of government “privilege teams” to filter out anything subject to the attorney-client privilege. Anything the privilege team determines is privileged information will be returned to Cohen or deleted from government computers. The exception would be anything that falls under the “crime-fraud exception”: anything relating to a client wanting to commit or cover up a crime is not subject to attorney-client privilege. It’s a pretty high bar to clear, the prosecutors will have to prove to a judge that the documents or communications are without a doubt related to criminal activity.
Could some of these guys WANT Trump to fire Mueller just to bring on obstruction of justice charges and a call for impeachment?
That journalist’s question has been a point of debate today. It’s inappropriate either way, but as far as I know none of the reporters there have come out to say which or the White House press people asked it, so it’s unknown whether he was from a mainstream organization or one of the weird right-wing outlets the Trump administration has given credentials to.

Some interesting things I learned today: Geoffrey Berman, the Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney behind the raids on Cohen, was a maximum donor to Trump’s 2016 campaign. Also, today the RNC scrubbed all mentions of their National Deputy Finance Chair, Michael Cohen, from their website.
 
Unfortunately, when you lay down with dogs, you get up with fleas. Trump has not been associating with the best people.
 
Imachine on violating attorney-client privilege . . .
requires very serious evidence of wrongdoing
So if this turns out to be a fishing expedition, are you going to support firing and jailing of Mueller and impeachment of the judge that “approved” this?

(I am not saying you should. I am not even saying I would. I am just wondering where you are at on this.)
 
Last edited:
So if this turns out to be a fishing expedition, are you going to support firing and jailing of Mueller and impeachment of the judge that “approved” this?
Mueller was not involved in these searches, he just passed this on to another prosecutor, so I would not support any negative consequences for him. If there was any corruption involved in this I feel the judge should of course be impeached. I find the possibility of that pretty unlikely though, raiding the offices of any attorney is a huge deal with all kinds of special sign-offs and procedures, and raiding the offices of the personal attorney of the President is extraordinary. While we don’t like it politics does influence the judiciary’s decisions, so I just don’t think a prosecutor would be able to convince a judge to put his or her name on this warrant without pretty compelling evidence of some criminal activity. This move will be subject to more scrutiny than just about anything the justice system can do.
 
Last edited:
Mueller was not involved in these searches, he just passed this on to another prosecutor, so I would not support any negative consequences for him. If there was any corruption involved in this I feel the judge should of course be impeached. I find the possibility of that pretty unlikely though, raiding the offices of any attorney is a huge deal with all kinds of special sign-offs and procedures, and raiding the offices of the personal attorney of the President is extraordinary. While we don’t like it politics does influence the judiciary’s decisions, so I just don’t think a prosecutor would be able to convince a judge to put his or her name on this warrant without pretty compelling evidence of some criminal activity. This move will be subject to more scrutiny than just about anything the justice system can do.
Thank you for the insightful response Imachine.

God bless.

Cathoholic
 
Cohen’s $130k payment which is claimed to be a FEC violation gets an FBI raid.

Obama campaign had FEC violations for 1300 donations totaling close to $1.9 million and gets a fine.
source

How anybody can say this was anything but the opportunity to go fishing though documents to find something to nail Trump with is beyond me.
 
You mean he (Trump) should be more like Jesus and let the left crucify him for the sins of everyone???
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top