F.B.I. Raids Office of Trump’s Longtime Lawyer Michael Cohen

  • Thread starter Thread starter lmachine
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
jagged said:
40.png
7_Sorrows:
I think you were perfectly capable of reading her post. There was only the letter A missing from snarky. I had no trouble reading what she posted.
Click to expand...
I guess you are better at working your way through multiple typos and poor punctuation than I am.
Click to expand...
You are just being difficult. Try harder next time maybe.
 
dvdjs said:
I don’t see that as his goal, and don’t see evidence to support that idea. Rather he is conducting the investigation that he was tasked with by the DoJ.
Click to expand...
Who is also an anti-Trumper. Did you ever wonder why Comey knew Rosenstein would appoint Mueller if Comey was fired? He knew it in advance and said so, which means he and Rosenstein had discussed it beforehand. The endless Mueller investigation/prosecution was the “insurance policy” hatched up under Comey’s direction of the FBI by Strotz, Page, McCabe, Ohr and others.

And the DOJ isn’t supposed to name independent prosecutors in the absence of a known crime. In this case, there wasn’t one.
 
JonNC said:
I would hope they wouldn’t seize documents protected by attorney client privilege.
Click to expand...
Of course they did.

In order to even guess at what’s privileged and what isn’t, they would have to study the documents or electronic messages or whatever. They didn’t do any of that in Cohen’s office or home.
 
Ridgerunner said:
In order to even guess at what’s privileged and what isn’t, they would have to study the documents or electronic messages or whatever. They didn’t do any of that in Cohen’s office or home.
Click to expand...
That’s what the privilege team’s for. Filtering out privileged information is a normal prosecutorial practice, especially since the wide adoption of email.
 
No I did not say you should try harder to be difficult. I said you should try harder to read someone’s post if there are typos. Spell check can also change words!
 
Last edited:
7_Sorrows said:
The democrats are the only ones I see working overtime trying to damage our country right now. I hope when all is said and done some kind of legislation will be put in place to prevent anything like this from happening again. No political party should have so much power to destroy the other political candidate simply because he won and they lost.
There has to be something put into place to protect the American people and the American voter and the election system from this ever happening again.
Click to expand...
I find it ironic that you speak of the danger of “so much power” about a party that has lost the senate, lost the house, lost the presidency, and lost most of the governorships and many of the state houses. If there is a danger of too much power, it would be with the people that actually have the most power.
 
Last edited:
dvdjs said:
I understand your narrative. But I think that it is more likely that the lack of character is on Trump’s side that the officials directing the execution of justice in the United States.
Click to expand...
The thing I find interesting is that if one brings up Trump’s character flaws which are too numerous to count, we get told that character is not important. Yet, let some politician do something Trump supporters don’t like and all we hear about is the supposed character flaws of the left, implying that those on the right are somehow virtuous.
 
exnihilo said:
No, but what purpose does it serve to raid the attorney of the President…
Click to expand...
…to prevent the destruction of evidence.
Breaking confidentially and opening up his private attorney correspondence on this matter is dangerous.
Click to expand...
The standards are indeed higher when contemplating an action of this sort, but apparently the standard was met. Or we will see when all the details come out.
 
Yes, you make a valid point. Also there is a different spell “fixer” for Android, iPhone, PC, etc.
 
Aren’t Jagged’s posts errily similar to someone else who used to post on the Forum?
 
Last edited:
PaulinVA said:
Is this possibly a RICO case? Is it illegal to pay off women for silence? How would you make that an ongoing criminal enterprise?
Click to expand...
No, it’s not illegal to give someone money in exchange for their silence on a matter, as long as the matter in question isn’t illegal. A 12 year old, one time dalliance with a porn star isn’t illegal.
 
Last edited:
that is why they are so dangerous! they are beside themselves. they are desperate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top