in Christ Jesus"
born in Adam) are those who
by grace (not so-called dispensed “
graces”) “
have been saved through faith; and that not of themselves; the gift of God,
not as a result of works” (Eph. 2:8-9).
I am curious MD, is do you understand there to be a difference between something being “given” and something being “dispensed”?
moondweller:
Code:
IOW, those prepared beforehand good works are for those who ARE ("*have been*") saved, not for the hope of being saved.
Both things are true. We are able to do these works because we are “in Christ”. The ergos hagios are produced in, with, and through His grace. Therefore, if we are able to do them, our hope is increased, for we know that we are walking in the path He has designed for us.
The people who have to worry or have no hope of being saved are the ones that are not able to walk in these works.
Code:
You see, the core problem with Catholicism is it has no concept of "*saved*."


Oh, I needed a good chortle!
MD, you seem to have forgotten that the NT is a Catholic collection of Catholic books/letters, that was written by, for, and about Catholics! All you know about salvation has come from the Catholic Church.
Now, all that inaccurate stuff you have about salvation has come from another source.
Why? Because it adds works to its doctrine of salvation.
No, MD, the work of God was added by God.
Anyway, try to be consistent with your calumny. First you say the CC has no concept of being saved, now you admit that the CC has a “doctrine of salvation”. So, which is it?
And for this reason salvation for Catholics is a future event (or not) based on one’s present performance.
In part, yes. The Aposltes taught that there are some aspects of our salvation that are past, some present, and some that are not completed in this life.
But in truth no Catholic can, nor is allowed to, believe he/she is SAVED (a present, eternal reality based on an historical event: the cross of Christ).
Well, of course we do! The refers to the part of salvation that is already completed. Baptism, which joins us to HIm in His death, is also a past historical even with eternal reality.
Working out our salvation is present.
Glorification does not occur in this life.
Because of the addition of works to salvation a Catholic cannot accept the words of Paul
If this were true, MD, then the Catholic author of those words would not have taught them to Catholics, nor would they have been preserved, protected, promulgated and canonized by the CC.
On the contrary, we only reject your misunderstanding of those words.
Code:
For in it {the} righteousness of God is revealed from **faith to faith**; as it is written, "BUT THE RIGHTEOUS {man} SHALL LIVE BY FAITH.
"[/indent]The “
righteous” {man} in this context is the one who does not work, but “
believes in Him who justifies the ungodly.”
We believe that the righteous one (justified) walks in the ergos hagios by grace, through faith. The grace that produces saving faith is the same grace that produces the works of righteousness in which we are to walk.
And in the congruity with Paul’s teachings throughout his Epistles he states in Phil. 3:9

hil 3:9 "
…and may be found in Him, not having a righteousness of my own derived from law (i.e., works - now catch the contrast):
but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness which {comes} from God on the basis of faith,"According to the Scriptures, the righteousness which comes from God is on the basis of FAITH alone.
Indeed, and that saving faith is the same faith that allows us to access the grace by which we can walk in righteousness. Catholics do not separate these from each other.
For it’s “the faith which was once for all delivered to the saints” (Jude 3) and preserved in Holy Writ for all subsequent generations.
What you do not realize, dear brother in Christ, is that your spiritual ancestors departed from that One Faith about 500 years ago, and what you now espouse constitutes what they called “a different gospel” than the one we received from them.