Hello,
You know, I’ve been thinking about, not only
this thread, but others as well, and I’ve come
to a conclusion I’d like to share with you.
It seems that some RC’s tend to rail at the idea of
the Church being one denomination among
many. I looked “denomination” up in the
dictionary, and the idea conveyed was a
group with a set of beliefs and
an acknowledged leadership [hierarchy].
How anyone can question that the RC Church
is the direct line of that Church established by
Jesus, I don’t get.
What i do “get” is that because the Church
is first in time and existed, undivided, basically,
until 1054 and again in the early 16th c., that
it declares itself to be the true Church.
I realized, admittedly with a sense of shock,
that those coming from other denominations
truly
do see the Church as one denomination
among many, which Church stumbled badly in
the early 16th century, “dropped” the torch, so
to speak, and that the torch was picked up
and carried forward by others.
So I can say: “Yes, but the Council of X stated
Y” and get the response: “So what?” And it
is a truly meant "So what? A “So what?” without
batting an eye, so to speak.
At first, I was incredulous at this kind of reply.
To say: “Yes, but the Church says…” and recieve
the reply: “Yes, but your’s is only one Christian
church” I found disorienting at first. At first.
Now I understand much better the orientation
toward Faith that non-Catholic Christians have.
To say that I understand it, does not necessarily
imply that I agree with it. But it does help in the
exchange of thoughts.
reen
“Inadequate, and
loving it!”