Really sad.
Agreed. The kids really can’t be held responsible for any of this (including getting here illegally).Really sad.
On a side note, it’s understandable that many Americans are angry about this stuff, but I wish they wouldn’t direct their anger at the poor souls on those buses – especially the children.
![]()
They need to be returned to their parents,then returned back to their homeland.The problem is, what do we do with these children?
No, we don’t want to blame them. Or take anything out on them.
But what do we do with them?
We don’t have enough foster parents for American children. Who thinks we are going to have enough for foreign children? Or do we just let them go? To live on the streets?![]()
They need to be returned to their parents,then returned back to their homeland.
The problem is, what do we do with these children?
+1They need to be returned to their parents,then returned back to their homeland.
The atrocities that are visited on these children when they are returned to their homes is horrific. I wouldn’t want that on my conscience!They need to be returned to their parents,then returned back to their homeland.
As someone posted earlier,re charity,using the analogy of a family struggling to make ends meet,feed their own children,chooses to send $$$ to a third world country to feed their starving children.The atrocities that are visited on these children when they are returned to their homes is horrific. I wouldn’t want that on my conscience!
Agree with youThey need to be returned to their parents,then returned back to their homeland.
Okay.The atrocities that are visited on these children when they are returned to their homes is horrific. I wouldn’t want that on my conscience!
If you’re making the point that we should prevent them from making the trip in the first place, rather than just dealing with them once they get here,I completely agree.The atrocities that are visited on these children when they are returned to their homes is horrific. I wouldn’t want that on my conscience!
sharylattkisson.com/the-big-unanswered-questions-about-the-child-illegal-immigrants/I don’t blame the children. I blame the thoroughly corrupt, crime ridden, 3rd world nation, that is Mexico.
Christ is within each of these children. Who among us would turn away Christ, no matter what challenges were presented by inviting Him in?Then the king will say to those at his right hand, “Come, you that are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world; for I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was naked and you gave me clothing, I was sick and you took care of me, I was in prison and you visited me.” Matthew 25:34-36
How?I don’t mean to be preachy, but Christ was pretty clear about the poor:
Christ is within each of these children. Who among us would turn away Christ, no matter what challenges were presented by inviting Him in?
Before I try to legitimately respond to your question, I have to ask: Is this really the question you’d ask if Jesus were outside your door? I’m not trying to elicit eye rolls here but really – would you ask how you’d manage to support Christ if He were the illegal immigrant here?How?
I mean it, how, exactly are we suppose to take care of all of these children?
We simply do not have the facilities to care for this many children, all at once.![]()
Thank you! I’m glad I’m not the only one who noticed that. See my earlier point:Christ didn’t say anything about only caring for the poor in one’s own country.
The fundamental question is this: Should those who cross our border illegally be placed ahead of those who are already waiting in line, so to speak, and following the rules? I say No, but apparently a lot of Americans say Yes.
There were plenty of potential immigrants on wait lists – people who were doing everything the “right way” – back when the St. Louis arrived on our shores. Does this somehow mean that the decision to turn the St. Louis away was morally justified?Thank you! I’m glad I’m not the only one who noticed that. See my earlier point: