J
JSmitty2005
Guest
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8221f/8221f05c6cb88f9155a654fed4353b710343c9eb" alt="40.png"
:yup:You’re most probably right. But let’s hope and pray you’re wrong. Yes?![]()
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0ce5/f0ce54f2eebe1a70cd738d3efa3205f761378e72" alt="Pray :gopray: :gopray:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0ce5/f0ce54f2eebe1a70cd738d3efa3205f761378e72" alt="Pray :gopray2: :gopray2:"
:yup:You’re most probably right. But let’s hope and pray you’re wrong. Yes?![]()
This is true, but it’s also true that the atmosphere that has inspired so many recent attacks on the Church by the media and in politics (we only have to look at the recent vote in San Francisco for evidence) aren’t to be swept aside as inconsequential . We are being attacked on every side, from within and without, in a manner not seen in quite some time. I can’t think it’s merely consequential–can any of us?Actually Fr. Mike Barrett (the priest that appears on NBC explaining Opus Dei) said something in an Evening of Recollection that made me optimistic. He said that, now that DVC has brought orthodox Catholicism front and center, it is a widespread opportunity for us to engage in dialog and conversation. In a way, this has helped accelerate conversations and awareness of orthodox and heretic ideas faster than without it. He added, with this book we are now several years ahead in the conversation, and we should take advantage of it. I agree.
For those who left the church, they will find emptiness without the church anyway, the DVC doesn’t lead to edify anyone. All the suggestions lead to deadends.
And if you open the conversation, it’s not deemed as ‘oh so religious,’ but rather taken in as contemporary and the walls are not so high.
in XT.
I agree Della, we cannot be naive. But in the end, what else can a single person do but continue their apostolate where they find it. Attacks from within and without have been the modus operandi of the Enemy since the beginning anyway, so we’re not that special…the other generations had it bad or worse than us I think.This is true, but it’s also true that the atmosphere that has inspired so many recent attacks on the Church by the media and in politics (we only have to look at the recent vote in San Francisco for evidence) aren’t to be swept aside as inconsequential . We are being attacked on every side, from within and without, in a manner not seen in quite some time. I can’t think it’s merely consequential–can any of us?
In my parish, our men’s group runs a literature rack where we put up copies of articles covering a variety of topics. Every week, for the last two months, we have placed 40 copies of this article de-bunking the Da Vinci Code:This is a tough balancing act. We certainly don’t want to draw unnecessary attention to this book and movie but we do need to educate people about the serious errors in this book. As Sandra Meisel (historian and co-author of The Da Vinci Hoax) points out, nearly everything in the Da Vinci Code is wrong! Somehow we need to let people know why.
I know most best-selling novels are made into movies with no greed in mind. That’s also why novels that don’t sell worth a darn but make a good statement get made into movies all the time.I believe it was Jeffery Lyons who pointed out that films (like the DaVinci Code) get made not because of box office, but in order to impress the powers that be in Hollywood, as “serious filmmakers,” so that those who make them will get accolades from their peers. They could care less how many people go to see it, especially if it is a message film in which Hollywood values are supported. Such a sad comment, but all too true!![]()
What a great idea. I think I’ll suggest the same tactic with my Men’s group. Thanks.In my parish, our men’s group runs a literature rack where we put up copies of articles covering a variety of topics. Every week, for the last two months, we have placed 40 copies of this article de-bunking the Da Vinci Code:
carl-olson.com/articles/tca_tdvc_apr04.html
Every week, they have gone like hot cakes (so far this works out to more than 320 copies given away) . We intend on placing them there until after the release of the movie. A little leaven affects the whole lump–if we can reach some, they can reach others. As they used to say in the 70"s: “Think globally, but act locally”!
AMEN!I wouldnt see it if it were free. Blasphemy!
Awesome! You go, Phil! :clapping: :bounce: :bowdown2:I just took two domain names
www.SoDumbTheConOfBrown.com
www.SoDumbTheConOfRon.com
Hope to do a little anti-DVC flash presentation with them…
Phil P
No offense, but if I were heading into a film to which I am going to A) relax and B) for most people, probably because it has Tom Hanks in it, and you tried to tell me I shouldn’t see what I want to see because you disagree with it, I’d eitherPass out material. Atleast the regular movie goers will be informed as they are the most likely to tell their friends or co-workers whether to see the movie or not.
Thanks, sending it out!Check this out:
churchofthemasses.blogspot.com/2006/03/dvc-othercott-reminder-spread-word.html
Spread the word!![]()
A silent partner isn’t silent. It means you’re doing the work but not requiring credit.Totally disagree. No I would not bother a regular movie goer if the issue didn’t strike at the core of a religious belief. That is what must be decided. Will the DaVinci Code movie affect how people feel about their faith or will it not? If not then don’t bother people but if so, then do something about it.
People were not annoyed. They actually wanted to know what the controvery was about because they had heard it in the news. Most took the information as long as it was simple to read and understand. I doubt that they threw it away because the managers came out later on and asked if they could see a copy. (I took 100 copies per show and often ran out)The young were open to discussion. They thought it was good that people stand up for something. One fifteen year old brought me a hot drink.
If people were silent and invisible on important issues, we would not have the America we know today.