I hope that God will soon open my heart in praying for Mr. Cutie.
Dear Deus:
As I have posted before, we must remember that it is not our place to judge a man’s soul. We can only make an objective judgment, the way the Church does in these cases. Fr. Albert has committed a sin against his PROMISE of celibacy. But that does not make him an evil person. All of us commit sins. Many of us break promises or fall short of Christian ideals. But are we evil? Should we be hated? Do others not owe us the charity of forgiveness and prayer?
Our holy father Francis wrote for us that if a brother sins against the rule we should correct him for his faults. If he does not listen to our correction, we should take him before the superior. If the superior admonishes or consequences such a brother, the other brothers are bound under penalty of sin to remain by his side. We are to pray for him. If he wishes, we are to pray with him. Under no circumstances are we to judge the state of a brother’s soul, not even his religious superior or confessor should do this, but only God. We should judge the action, not the person said our holy father Francis.
This is the action that the Archdiocese of Miami and the bishops have taken. They have heard his story. They have stated that his behaviour is unacceptable. They have also reminded the world that these events are meant to call all of us to examine our consciences and stay clear of that which can lead us to sin.
To feel that one cannot pray for a fallen sinner is contrary to the mystery of the cross. Christ gave his life for sinners, not for the righteous. As my superior said when this scandal broke out, “Thank God the Church is like a hospital, a home for sinners. The mystery of the cross as St. Francis taught us is the mystery of sin and mercy. Therefore, I forbid any brother from denying Father Albert their mercy and their prayers.”
The archbishop himself said that he would not deny Fr. Albert the rights and graces of his priesthood. I noticed that you call him “Mr. Cutie”. He is still a secular priest. He has not been suspended, nor dispensed from his priestly rights and oblgiations. He remains a member of the clergy in full standing. These are the wishes of the Holy Father. He does not want any priest or religious brother in solemn vows to be ejected from the Church, a diocese or a religious order for any reason except those found in canon law that would automatically exclude you from either the priesthood, religious life or the Church.
A violation of celibacy does not automatically exclude you from either. If Fr. Albert were to embrace heresy, disobey the bishop in matters that are forbidden by canon law, or deny the faith, only then will he excommunicate himself. The only thing that the diocese took away from him was his parish and his media ministry.
As far as the Holy See is concerned he can say mass, hear confessions, celebrate the sacraments and perform other priestly duties. He will be a priest until the day he dies. There is no way that the Sacrament of Holy Orders can be taken from a man, any more than one can take away a person’s Baptism.
Judas became a priest and bishop at the Last Supper, even though he was to betray Christ. So did Peter, even though he was to deny Christ. Neither was stripped of Holy Orders. Judas died a priest, abeit a sinful one, but a priest nonetheless. Peter we all know the story. Even Thomas who lacked faith in the resurrection, never lost his priestly state. Of course we know how that story ended too.
We judge actions, not souls. We cannot make objective judgment over souls, especially when our own feelings are in the way, never mind when someone else’s feelings are involved. That is why the bishops did not suspend Fr. Albert. He is currently on leave of absence at his own request.
The purpose of a leave of absence is to give the person time to think and pray what the next step is to be. There are several options that Fr. Albert has to choose from them.
He can ask for a dispensation, but all of us who are either secular priests or brothers in solemn vows (my case) have been told that there are no dispensations, because there is a shortage of secular priests and religious brothers.
So, Fr. Albert remains a priest until death. He will be allowed to exercise the priesthood, even if it is with restrictions, unless he violates canon law.
The thing about a sin against celibacy is that while it is unacceptable and a scandal, it can be forgiven in confession, if the person repents and has the intention of moving forward.
Usually, a leave of absence can extend up to five years. During that time the secular priest remains a priest. Most distance themselves from the ministry to have some space and time to think and to try living as a lay person. But they must remain in contact with their bishop. The bishop can recall them to active ministry at his discretion and they must obey.
If they refuse to return and remain away, without a dispensation, then they incur a suspension, not an excommunication. If he joins another Church, he excommunicates himself as did the founders of the Protestant ecclesial communities.
I have said before, that I feel pity for the people of St. Francis de Sales Parish. They have lost three consecutive pastors whom they dearly loved. They need our prayers.
Fr. Cutie also needs our prayers. That is our gift of mercy, the same mercy that Christ and his mother show on the cross. Remember, Christ opened his arms on the cross for sinners. At the foot of the cross, Mary, who had no sin, accepted all sinners as her children. She and Jesus were victims of sin. Yet, they intercede for sinners and so should we.
Fraternally,
Br. JR, OSF
