Forgive me for asking . .

  • Thread starter Thread starter spockrates
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, so those who reject His love and forgiveness must be only potentially forgiven, rather than actually forgiven, I think. What do you think?
They are actually forgiven as far as God is concerned but they choose to make themselves unforgivable! It takes two to achieve unity… 🙂

And He also takes those who pray that they may be forgiven **as **they forgive others at their word - which is not into heaven!
 
They are actually forgiven as far as God is concerned but they choose to make themselves unforgivable! It takes two to achieve unity… 🙂

And He also takes those who pray that they may be forgiven **as **they forgive others at their word - which is not into heaven!
But I’m confused.

:o

Earlier, you said:
Actual. He forgives us as we forgive others. 🙂
So I assumed that, since God forgives *as *we forgive others, He then does *not *forgive as we do *not *forgive others. Now you appear to be saying the opposite: God forgives even if we don’t forgive others!

I’m sure I’m just misunderstanding you. Please alleviate my confusion and tell me plainly: Does God forgive all–even those who refuse to forgive others?

🤷
 
Tony:

I think that the Father of Philosophy Socrates has some advice that will help us better express our ideas:

No matter what the subject, there is for those who wish to deliberate well upon it always one and the same starting point: You must know what it is you are deliberating about, or you will inevitably fail altogether. Most people, however, are not aware of their ignorance of a thing’s essential nature, and because they think they know all about it, they fail to secure agreement about the premises of their inquiry at its beginning. As they proceed, they reap the predictable harvest of this oversight: They disagree with one another and even contradict themselves. Now, you and I must not be guilty of this fundamental error that we condemn in others …

(Phaedrus, 237)

What he is saying is this: Before you or I can explain how to do something, we must first figure out what that something is. Applying this recommendation to our dialog, I’d say that before we can adequately express how to forgive, we must first figure out what forgiveness is.

So please tell me, Tony: What do you think forgiveness is?

🙂
 
My dear friend,

In my opinion forgiveness is but a stepping stone on the path to perfection. Human perfection is the absence of evil in man. And whilst you may see and experience evil, once your perfect forgivenes is so perfected and complete you absolutely excuse evil as if it didn’t happen. Forgiveness is a life long struggle on the path to human perfection , once attained it is a way of life , intuitive on auto pilot sort of. Gods forgivenes of us will be as we forgive others. If we work towards this goal our forgiveness by God will be so complete if we achieve it we will be completely forgiven. A sure path straight to heaven , we’re we don’t need our imperfct love purified in purgatory , because our love is already perfect. Love unites , and to unite it must forgive without measure. Evil divides. 3 great rules for life are – don’t judge , be merciful and forgive ,if you do this perfectly you have attained the perfection of charity which is love. The spiritual life and Gods law can be summed up in one word , when that one word is properly undersood - Love.

Hope this helps dear friend.

God bless and Love you 👍🙂

John
 
What he is saying is this: Before you or I can explain how to do something, we must first figure out what that something is. Applying this recommendation to our dialog, I’d say that before we can adequately express how to forgive, we must first figure out what forgiveness is.

🙂
It’s amazing how difficult it is to define a concept that we all seem to at least apprehend.

-Prophesy

500 Posts!
 
Thanks David.

👍

Yes, I agree that it is loving to warn someone who is ignorant of her sin, but is it merciful? The current question raised is whether Jesus ever failed to show mercy. Another question: If He was at times not merciful, then should we at times withhold mercy, too?

🤷
As Jesus is God, who is perfect, He can never fail to show mercy. Based on this your second question is moot.

Why you think mercy = forgiveness? Is forgiveness the only way to show mercy?
 
But I’m confused.
:o
Earlier, you said:

So I assumed that, since God forgives *as *we forgive others, He then does *not *forgive as we do *not *forgive others. Now you appear to be saying the opposite: God forgives even if we don’t forgive others!

I’m sure I’m just misunderstanding you. Please alleviate my confusion and tell me plainly: Does God forgive all–even those who refuse to forgive others?

🤷
God is infinitely merciful but He is also infinitely just. So He forgives everyone but He does not forgive everyone to the same extent. Those who not forgive others make themselves unforgivable to the precise extent that they are unforgiving. 🙂
 
Tony:

I think that the Father of Philosophy Socrates has some advice that will help us better express our ideas:
No matter what the subject, there is for those who wish to deliberate well upon it always one and the same starting point: You must know what it is you are deliberating about, or you will inevitably fail altogether. Most people, however, are not aware of their ignorance of a thing’s essential nature, and because they think they know all about it, they fail to secure agreement about the premises of their inquiry at its beginning. As they proceed, they reap the predictable harvest of this oversight: They disagree with one another and even contradict themselves. Now, you and I must not be guilty of this fundamental error that we condemn in others …

(Phaedrus, 237)What he is saying is this: Before you or I can explain how to do something, we must first figure out what that something is. Applying this recommendation to our dialog, I’d say that before we can adequately express how to forgive, we must first figure out what forgiveness is.

So please tell me, Tony: What do you think forgiveness is?

🙂
To forgive is to respond lovingly to a thought, action or omission which has harmed you (or was intended to harm you). It literally means “to give completely”, i.e. not to expect anything in return: no form of atonement or compensation for the offence - unless you believe the offender will not improve if he does not have to make amends. To forgive is not to forget or to forsake fairness. It is to put the other person’s welfare before any desire for revenge or retribution.
 
My dear friend,

In my opinion forgiveness is but a stepping stone on the path to perfection. Human perfection is the absence of evil in man. And whilst you may see and experience evil, once your perfect forgivenes is so perfected and complete you absolutely excuse evil as if it didn’t happen. Forgiveness is a life long struggle on the path to human perfection , once attained it is a way of life , intuitive on auto pilot sort of. Gods forgivenes of us will be as we forgive others. If we work towards this goal our forgiveness by God will be so complete if we achieve it we will be completely forgiven. A sure path straight to heaven , we’re we don’t need our imperfct love purified in purgatory , because our love is already perfect. Love unites , and to unite it must forgive without measure. Evil divides. 3 great rules for life are – don’t judge , be merciful and forgive ,if you do this perfectly you have attained the perfection of charity which is love. The spiritual life and Gods law can be summed up in one word , when that one word is properly undersood - Love.

Hope this helps dear friend.

God bless and Love you 👍🙂

John
Wonderful words, JR! (and good to hear from you again). I’ve often spoke the idiom, “Nobody is perfect,” but when I hear words like yours, and other words spoken like a true Thomist, I wonder whether their is truth in that idiom.

🙂

Would you say, then that we should do our best to obey Jesus’ words?

“Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.”

(Matthew 5:48)

Would you even go so far as to agree with the disciples of Saint Thomas Aquinas that with divine mercy and divine assistance, such perfection is possible this side of eternity?
 
It’s amazing how difficult it is to define a concept that we all seem to at least apprehend.

-Prophesy

500 Posts!
Yes, and four consecutive discussion threads! Even more amazing is that we keep using the words forgiving, forgiveness, and other forms of the word forgive without really knowing for certain what the word means! Reminds me of a dialog Socrates had with an acquaintance of his:

SOCRATES:. And is it not shameless when we do not know what knowledge
is, to be explaining the verb “to know”? The truth is, Theaetetus,
that we have long been infected with logical impurity. Thousands of
times have we repeated the words “we know,” and “do not know,” and “we
have or have not science or knowledge,” as if we could understand what
we are saying to one another, so long as we remain ignorant about
knowledge; and at this moment we are using the words “we
understand,” “we are ignorant,” as though we could still employ them
when deprived of knowledge or science.

THEAETUS: But if you avoid these expressions, Socrates, how will you
ever argue at all?

SOC: I could not, being the man I am. The case would be different if
I were a true hero of dialectic: and O that such an one were
present! for he would have told us to avoid the use of these terms; at
the same time he would not have spared in you and me the faults
which I have noted. But, seeing that we are no great wits, shall I
venture to say what knowing is? for I think that the attempt may be
worth making.

THEAET: Then by all means venture, and no one shall find fault
with you for using the forbidden terms.

In this dialog, they were trying to answer the question asked by many for eons (including the Roman Governor Pilot who had Jesus crucified: What is truth? For truth, to the ancient Greeks, was synonymous with knowledge. And just as it is funny that they kept using the word knowledge when they had no idea what it meant, so too is it funny that we keep using the word forgive when we have no idea what it means.

Still, that should not keep us from trying, for God certainly wants us to know what forgiveness is, for He wants us to forgive, and how can we know how to forgive if we don’t even know what the word means?

😃

But I have some unproven theories of the meaning of the forbidden term, if you care to consider them with me.

🙂
 
As Jesus is God, who is perfect, He can never fail to show mercy. Based on this your second question is moot.

Why you think mercy = forgiveness? Is forgiveness the only way to show mercy?
Well, it’s not that I think that mercy is a kind of forgiveness–it’s that I wonder. I’m a Christian first, but also a philosopher second, and as Socrates said:

…wonder is the feeling of a philosopher, and philosophy begins in wonder.

(Theaetetus, 155)

You see, a few thoughtful people at CAF have told me that God’s Divine Mercy is an example of forgiveness, and that our showing mercy to someone is synonymous with forgiving. So I’m wondering whether what they tell me is true, and sincerely considering it, and asking people like yourself whether it is true.

It seems to me at the moment, however that Mercy cannot actually be a kind of forgiveness. For it is possible, I think to show mercy without forgiving. A judge, for example might show mercy to a convicted criminal by giving him a 10-year jail sentence instead of life sentence. However, I would not say that this leniency constitutes forgiving him for his crime. For the judge in this example does not pardon him by declaring him not guilty.

But see how I’ve defined the terms mercy and forgive by my explanation? I’ve suggested that

mercy = leniency

and

forgiveness = pardoning

and

leniency is not = pardoning

so

mercy is not = forgiveness

But should someone change the meaning of the terms mercy and forgiveness, we might come to a different (and opposite) conclusion that showing mercy is indeed the same as showing forgiveness.

It seems to me that the key to unlocking the answer to the OP and to learning for certain what forgiveness is (and by so learning, understand how God wants us to forgive) is to correctly define what forgiveness is, and perhaps what it is not.

So what do you think of my suggested definitions? Do you think it is true that forgiveness = pardoning a person for personal wrongs done against me? Do you think it is true that mercy = showing leniency to a person when punishing him for the personal wrongs done to me? Or do you think, as Shakespeare’s Hamlet said?

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy. …

Do you think there is more to mercy than being lenient, or more to forgiveness than pardoning? And if there is more, then what more should we dream of or wonder about?

🤷
 
God is infinitely merciful but He is also infinitely just. So He forgives everyone but He does not forgive everyone to the same extent. Those who not forgive others make themselves unforgivable to the precise extent that they are unforgiving. 🙂
Excellent! Yes, that’s the ticket that will buy us a seat on Forgiven Flight 777! There are different extents, or degrees, or perhaps ways to forgive. Well said, Tony Ray. Your wisdom has shown the way to our destination truth.

👍

Now that we have a destination in mind, we just need to find the best route to arrive safely. Let’s see, perhaps considering the answer to this question will help. Please tell me:

In what way (or to what extent) does God forgive those in Hell? In what way (or to what extent) does God not forgive the same damned?
 
To forgive is to respond lovingly to a thought, action or omission which has harmed you (or was intended to harm you). It literally means “to give completely”, i.e. not to expect anything in return: no form of atonement or compensation for the offence - unless you believe the offender will not improve if he does not have to make amends. To forgive is not to forget or to forsake fairness. It is to put the other person’s welfare before any desire for revenge or retribution.
Yes, that is a good start. The only change I’d suggest is that instead of saying that forgiving is “to give completely,” I’d suggest changing this to say that forgiving is “to give to the extent that is justified.” For I think you are justified in saying that there one can forgive to different extents.

All we have to do now is to explain what the different extents (or ways to forgive) are, and then determine when each of these extents (or ways) is justified. We will then have a more perfect understanding of what forgiveness is, and the different ways to forgive, and when to forgive in one way, but not in another. And we will arrive at Forgiveness Airport on Paradise Island with wisdom in our minds, forgiveness in our hearts and smiles of satisfaction on our faces! Don’t you agree?

🙂
 
Yes, that is a good start. The only change I’d suggest is that instead of saying that forgiving is “to give completely,” I’d suggest changing this to say that forgiving is “to give to the extent that is justified.” For I think you are justified in saying that there one can forgive to different extents.

All we have to do now is to explain what the different extents (or ways to forgive) are, and then determine when each of these extents (or ways) is justified. We will then have a more perfect understanding of what forgiveness is, and the different ways to forgive, and when to forgive in one way, but not in another. And we will arrive at Forgiveness Airport on Paradise Island with wisdom in our minds, forgiveness in our hearts and smiles of satisfaction on our faces! Don’t you agree?

🙂
Of course. I like your delightful image of Forgiveness Airport on Paradise Island. :clapping:
 
Wonderful words, JR! (and good to hear from you again). I’ve often spoke the idiom, “Nobody is perfect,” but when I hear words like yours, and other words spoken like a true Thomist, I wonder whether their is truth in that idiom.

🙂

Would you say, then that we should do our best to obey Jesus’ words?
“Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.”

(Matthew 5:48)
Would you even go so far as to agree with the disciples of Saint Thomas Aquinas that with divine mercy and divine assistance, such perfection is possible this side of eternity?
My dear friend,

It is great to see you again too. And yes , we should try and do what Jesus says for sure. The problem comes that our world and us are upside down and being perfect is not easily done. But in a very real sense in my own opine all men are really perfect although the realisation is not with us all yet. This is because in eternity , in my opinion , all of us will be restored to the garden of eden , and all are perfect there , and we are right now all we will be for eternity , so we are all perfect now , but have not realised it yet so must struggle on. We are the oposite of reality in a sense to take care of the problem of evil which God cannot allow to exist , this is our real problem. So our whole world being outside reality , evil can exist but in reality it does not at all – it’s a delusion. It’s a very long story this. Great to see you dear friend. Soldier on , and live long and prosper 😃

God bless and Love you 👍🙂

John
 
My dear friend,

It is great to see you again too. And yes , we should try and do what Jesus says for sure. The problem comes that our world and us are upside down and being perfect is not easily done. But in a very real sense in my own opine all men are really perfect although the realisation is not with us all yet. This is because in eternity , in my opinion , all of us will be restored to the garden of eden , and all are perfect there ,
Yes, I understand and agree with all you have said!

and we are right now all we will be for eternity , so we are all perfect now , but have not realised it yet so must struggle on.
D’oh! Ya’ lost me! If we have not realized (or achieved) our perfection, then how can we now be actually perfect? You mean that we are merely potentially perfect, don’t you?

http://www.allthatiknow.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/homer-simpson-doh.jpg
We are the oposite of reality in a sense to take care of the problem of evil which God cannot allow to exist , this is our real problem. So our whole world being outside reality , evil can exist but in reality it does not at all – it’s a delusion. It’s a very long story this. Great to see you dear friend. Soldier on , and live long and prosper 😃

God bless and Love you 👍🙂

John
Yes, I suppose it might be a long story. But I’m a philosopher, and like Socrates, I care not whether our words are many or few, so long as we find the truth. So sit with me awhile and tell me the tale of the heroes who were, and are, and forever will be as perfect as the God of Perfection.

🙂
 
Yes, I understand and agree with all you have said!

http://www.tomtom.com/lib/voices/homer.jpg

D’oh! Ya’ lost me! If we have not realized (or achieved) our perfection, then how can we now be actually perfect? You mean that we are merely potentially perfect, don’t you?

http://www.allthatiknow.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/homer-simpson-doh.jpg

Yes, I suppose it might be a long story. But I’m a philosopher, and like Socrates, I care not whether our words are many or few, so long as we find the truth. So sit with me awhile and tell me the tale of the heroes who were, and are, and forever will be as perfect as the God of Perfection.

🙂
My dearest friend ,

I have a thread curently going in this philosophy forum " does man or Angels , demons really hav free will ? " , I write a bit different but check it out about the delusion we’e in if you like. It’s still going though.

But to answer your question : What is original sin? It is simply the loss of reality or casting into the delusion to take care of the problem of evil. What are personal sins? They are simply evil that is not allowed to exist. How are we really perfect if we can’t experience this actuality now? We have been made the opposite of reality because evil cannot exist , but it cannot exist in reality or the garen of eden , in the delusion it can exist but because it exists outside of reality it really does not exist. W do exist very really but our apparent imperfection is a delusion. Example : a man is dying any second at 90 y.o. and his whole life he has never done a single little thing wrong , bad or evil. Is he perfect? Yes. But in the delusion he is seriosly mentally ill , hunchbacked , crippled and horrifically deformed , and even outright obnoxious and difficult to put up with , but never guilty of any wrongdoing at all. Is he still perfect? No , but in reality he is perfect because once he has reality back he will be whole with no problems at all , once back in the garden of eden. Whilst we seem so imperfect here, in reality we are all absolutely perfect. We can lose our souls for now in this big game God has set up to sort out this problem of evil though. We need to be good still . Hope this answers your question. Let me know dear brother.

God bless and Love you 👍🙂

John
 
My dearest friend ,

I have a thread curently going in this philosophy forum " does man or Angels , demons really hav free will ? " , I write a bit different but check it out about the delusion we’e in if you like. It’s still going though.
Thanks for the invitation.

🙂
But to answer your question : What is original sin? It is simply the loss of reality or casting into the delusion to take care of the problem of evil. What are personal sins? They are simply evil that is not allowed to exist.
Not sure I understand. If personal sins are not allowed to exist, then no one commits any personal sins, for they don’t exist.

:confused:
How are we really perfect if we can’t experience this actuality now? We have been made the opposite of reality because evil cannot exist , but it cannot exist in reality or the garen of eden , in the delusion it can exist but because it exists outside of reality it really does not exist.
But if evil does not exist, then there is no problem of evil, for no one does anything evil. Is this what you are trying to say?

🤷
W do exist very really but our apparent imperfection is a delusion. Example : a man is dying any second at 90 y.o. and his whole life he has never done a single little thing wrong , bad or evil. Is he perfect? Yes. But in the delusion he is seriosly mentally ill , hunchbacked , crippled and horrifically deformed , and even outright obnoxious and difficult to put up with , but never guilty of any wrongdoing at all. Is he still perfect? No , but in reality he is perfect because once he has reality back he will be whole with no problems at all , once back in the garden of eden. Whilst we seem so imperfect here, in reality we are all absolutely perfect. We can lose our souls for now in this big game God has set up to sort out this problem of evil though. We need to be good still . Hope this answers your question. Let me know dear brother.

God bless and Love you 👍🙂

John
Perhaps the truth you are trying to convey is either
  1. We will become perfect, but are not perfect now.
or
  1. We are potentially perfect, but are not yet actually so.
Which is the truth, JR please let me know.

🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top