It’s a pope bashing website and those that click on the link thinking they are Catholic deserve to know that.What I posted has nothing about “pope bashing,” it is about bishops making statements in defense of Catholic teaching.
Lifesitenews has posted some very critical posts regarding Pope Francis and that’s why I don’t follow them but there are other sources reporting on the new news regarding the US Bishops and/or Kazakh Bishops:Lifesitenews - the “Catholic” site that has nonstop Pope Francis bashing.
Are the bishops guilty of bashing the pope for writing their letter, or does it constitute pope bashing to report what they wrote?I wonder if the Catholic staff of Lifesite ever feel guilty for the continuous bashing of the Holy Father.
I doubt it…I’m sure it has made them a lot of money.I wonder if the Catholic staff of Lifesite ever feel guilty for the continuous bashing of the Holy Father.
This is the point. Whichever side one chooses to align with, the problem is that there are sides at all. That there is such a serious dispute within the church is a really bad thing.The issues within Holy Mother Church are coming to a head. Lines are being drawn it would seem. This is going to be an interesting year.
It’s a sad commentary on "catholic’ news sources that they are nothing but pope bashing, which apparently is quite profitable.It’s a sad commentary on the present situation when merely posting a piece about bishops defending what was taken for granted by Catholics until recently immediately brings accusations of “pope bashing.”
The founder is an unabashed pope basher, which begs a question on why a good Catholic would go to that site? Maybe you can answer that question for me.Reporting what bishops have said does not constitute “nothing but pope bashing.”
Be that as it may, the matter in question seems to be genuine “news”, or do you have reason to believe fabrication or misrepresentation?Lifesitenews - the “Catholic” site that has nonstop Pope Francis bashing.
Or is it just to call either act “pope bashing”?Are the bishops guilty of bashing the pope for writing their letter, or does it constitute pope bashing to report what they wrote?
I have NOT found this to be so. Yes, EWTN is pro-life, but EVERYTHING else seems to be down the middle. IMHOAs far as the others, I find EWTN to be the Catholic Fox News and Raymond Arroyo is a willing accomplice to the right wing propaganda machine if not a fully fledged member and most of the sites you mention (I will say I have I don’t have an opinion on Catholic World Report) along with Lifesitenews and Church Militant are the worst of televangelism brought into the Catholic world on the World Wide Web. They are garbage theology for right wing nutjobs to feel like Republicanism and Catholicism are one and the same.