Fr. Corapi Responds to Some of His Order's Charges

  • Thread starter Thread starter jwinch2
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Agreed! We have been fortunate to have wonderful priests as well. Our parish just got two new ones and but the Catholic center on campus where I work has the same one still. All of them have been great. The average parish priest doesn’t get enough credit and is often as good of a speaker as some of the “rock star” priests which are out there.

The average parish priest has to put together multiple homilies on a weekly basis. I have no doubt that if they were given the time to plan a talk for several weeks that many of them could put together one that would be fantastic.
One of our priests is a professor of theology at the local Catholic university (Jesuit). He is awesomely orthodox in spite of the. 😃 We get great homilies at the daily 6:30 AM masses. He inspired me to learn more about the facts of our faith. And then came CAF. I have learned more in the past 7 years than 16 years of Catholic schools!
 
Now you’ve crossed the line. It’s one thing to say there’s an allegation of drug and alcohol abuse, it’s something else to affirm emphatically that Fr. Corapi has “a long history” as if you have personal knowledge.
This is not personal knowledge, but public. He has talked about it many times, and has even gotten a DWI after he was ordained. Suffering from addiction does not make a person “bad”.
I’m going to take a break from posting. But think of this, how much do you know about the SOLT organization? How much do you know about Fr. Sheehan? What’s the skeleton in his own closet?
I have learned a great deal about SOLT through this whole scandal. I really did not understand what it was until I started researching over this. I am sure that they are all mortified that they did not rein Corapi in much sooner, possibly avoiding this type of scandal.
Granted that SOLT may be an “arm” of Mother Church, does Fr. Sheehan’s verdict rise to the level of dogmatic truth?
I encourage you to read JREducation’s posts and the Rule of St. Benedict he has recommended. The superior of the community “rules”, for better or for worse. There is nothing damaging to Corapi about divesting himself of his luxuries and coming to live with his peers. There is also much benefit in him working on a team.
Do you even know the names of the fact-finding trio? Do they go to confession on a regular basis, teach CCD classes or go to the pro-life marches? On the other hand, we do know Fr. Corapi quite well.
It seems to me that this whole scandal has made it clear that no one knows Corapi all that well. There are many of us that have listened to his talks, and know his public persona well, but clearly , he is no always acting according to that public persona.
The question is why some people have placed their complete trust on people who they don’t know anything about? So I will ask the same question:

How on earth, can any human being engender such a level of blind trust that he or she choose repeatedly to suspend all logic and reason in denouncing a priest who’s been so faithfully preaching and teaching the Faith for 20 years? I say, let’s be prudent and at least wait until the jury is out.
No one here is doing anything blindly, franas. The fact finding team found concerning details. The superior felt compelled to put him on leave, and then later, to state publicly that he iis not fit for ministry. They have good reasons for doing so. I am sure they are not only not blind, but have seen more than they ever wanted to see.

I think it would be prudent to follow the shepherds that God has appointed over us.
 
All that Catholics need to know about him is that he is the canonically elected Superior General of the SOLT . . . . . .that’s what St. Francis was teaching us about priests. You separate the message from the messenger.
Bravo! Nicely stated.

VC
 
On the question of the “era” that has ended and the one that is soon to begin, I wonder if Fr Corapi isn’t making his intentions very clear in the first lines of his most recent post:

“For twenty years I tried to impart the Catholic and Christian Faith through preaching and teaching the Word of God as a Catholic priest. That era of my life is sadly ended . . .”

In all the drama of the Black SheepDog imagery, we may have been distracted away from the import of these words and what they imply.
  • FJC makes a point of separating “Catholic and Christian” when referring to the Faith. This is phrasing commonly used by Protestant evangelicals, who do not consider Catholicism a legitimate form of Christianity. Have you ever heard him do this in the last 20 years?
  • He stresses “teaching the Word of God”–another Protestant evangelical catchphrase, emphasizing the sola Scriptura reliance on the Word, literally interpreted. Have you ever heard Fr Corapi use this terminology? His old web page stresses that his teachings are firmly rooted in the Truth according to the Magisterium.
  • He makes it very clear that the “this” in “This era of my life has sadly ended” modifies “as a Catholic priest.” In all the speculation about whether he is giving up his priesthood, has he ever before prefaced it with the adjective “Catholic”?
It may seem audacious for a first-time poster to engage in this level of persnickety parsing, but please stop and think of who we are talking about. In all the years we have listened to him, has Fr Corapi ever made an unthinking comment? He recognizes and lives by the power of words, and he selects them carefully. Whether we believe this transition is of his own free choice or a desperate attempt to make the best of a situation he sees as untenable, John Corapi is telling us very clearly that he is going ONWARD as neither a priest nor a Catholic in any public sense. All the denial in the world will not change those words he so carefully chose, as well as the ones he has so carefully chosen to downplay or eliminate entirely from his messages since Ash Wednesday: Eucharist, sacraments, Mass, Father, Magisterium, Catholic, rosary–and, saddest of all, the name that was on his lips for those 20 years, Our Blessed Mother Mary.

Those who choose to follow him into the new era should stop and think seriously of what he is asking them to leave behind. I say this with all charity and prayerfulness toward him and all those who love him. This is not judgment or detraction: it is, to use a scriptural reference suitable to his new, broader audience, quite literally reading the writing on the wall.
 
This is the second time that someone has brought this up:

*Repeating a priest’s (alleged) sins over and over again on a thread serves no positive purpose; neither to one’s soul, nor to the priest, nor to the ministerial priesthood which is at the heart of our Holy Catholic faith . *

I find this untruthful. Clearly, nobody here has been rehashing the Father’s sins just to relish in them. The ONLY reason folks have to keep reiterating the same stuff over and over is for the very few folks who remain in denial. How many times does Br. JR have to repeat the rule of obedience and the canonical law? How many times to we have to repeat that yes, Father WAS declared unfit for ministry, he WAS called guilty by his society’s authority, that the SOLT DOES have authority to do so, that there will be no civil trial for these allegations (the one civil trial has to do with breach of contract and false allegations that disrupted a business… and so forth.

No one came to this thread just to defame John Corapi. And those of us answering the ones in denial or to share our own pain don’t hate the man, understand that he is and always will be a priest, understand we all sin, and aren’t haters attacking him for the fun of it.

When new folks, or ones still in denial insist they are going to wait for some official court decision, the regulars here must rehash for the umpteenth time - this is what his superior authority at the SOLT did find (guilty of certain charges), and yes, they have the authority to do so, and no, there will be no further official decision unless John Corapi appeals to the Vatican.
 
On the question of the “era” that has ended and the one that is soon to begin, I wonder if Fr Corapi isn’t making his intentions very clear in the first lines of his most recent post:

“For twenty years I tried to impart the Catholic and Christian Faith through preaching and teaching the Word of God as a Catholic priest. That era of my life is sadly ended . . .”

In all the drama of the Black SheepDog imagery, we may have been distracted away from the import of these words and what they imply.
  • FJC makes a point of separating “Catholic and Christian” when referring to the Faith. This is phrasing commonly used by Protestant evangelicals, who do not consider Catholicism a legitimate form of Christianity. Have you ever heard him do this in the last 20 years?
  • He stresses “teaching the Word of God”–another Protestant evangelical catchphrase, emphasizing the sola Scriptura reliance on the Word, literally interpreted. Have you ever heard Fr Corapi use this terminology? His old web page stresses that his teachings are firmly rooted in the Truth according to the Magisterium.
  • He makes it very clear that the “this” in “This era of my life has sadly ended” modifies “as a Catholic priest.” In all the speculation about whether he is giving up his priesthood, has he ever before prefaced it with the adjective “Catholic”?
Whether we believe this transition is of his own free choice or a desperate attempt to make the best of a situation he sees as untenable, John Corapi is telling us very clearly that he is going ONWARD as neither a priest nor a Catholic in any public sense. All the denial in the world will not change those words he so carefully chose, as well as the ones he has so carefully chosen to downplay or eliminate entirely from his messages since Ash Wednesday: Eucharist, sacraments, Mass, Father, Magisterium, Catholic, rosary–and, saddest of all, the name that was on his lips for those 20 years, Our Blessed Mother Mary.

Those who choose to follow him into the new era should stop and think seriously of what he is asking them to leave behind. I say this with all charity and prayerfulness toward him and all those who love him. This is not judgment or detraction: it is, to use a scriptural reference suitable to his new, broader audience, quite literally reading the writing on the wall.
You know, I am a former Evangelical, now a convert (25 years ago) to the Catholic Church. These are very good and valid points that you are making, and should not be dismissed. I have to tell you, Protestants, many of whom are still eager to point out the backwardness of the Catholic Church, will welcome him with open arms. Do not be surprised if this happens. To many Protestants, he will be a hero for what he is doing in standing up to the “immoral” (Fr. Corapi’s own characterization) policies and procedures of the Catholic Church.
 
This is the second time that someone has brought this up:

*Repeating a priest’s (alleged) sins over and over again on a thread serves no positive purpose; neither to one’s soul, nor to the priest, nor to the ministerial priesthood which is at the heart of our Holy Catholic faith . *

I find this untruthful. Clearly, nobody here has been rehashing the Father’s sins just to relish in them. The ONLY reason folks have to keep reiterating the same stuff over and over is for the very few folks who remain in denial. How many times does Br. JR have to repeat the rule of obedience and the canonical law? How many times to we have to repeat that yes, Father WAS declared unfit for ministry, he WAS called guilty by his society’s authority, that the SOLT DOES have authority to do so, that there will be no civil trial for these allegations (the one civil trial has to do with breach of contract and false allegations that disrupted a business… and so forth.

No one came to this thread just to defame John Corapi. And those of us answering the ones in denial or to share our own pain don’t hate the man, understand that he is and always will be a priest, understand we all sin, and aren’t haters attacking him for the fun of it.

When new folks, or ones still in denial insist they are going to wait for some official court decision, the regulars here must rehash for the umpteenth time - this is what his superior authority at the SOLT did find (guilty of certain charges), and yes, they have the authority to do so, and no, there will be no further official decision unless John Corapi appeals to the Vatican.
Very well said and spot on 👍
 
This is the second time that someone has brought this up:

*Repeating a priest’s (alleged) sins over and over again on a thread serves no positive purpose; neither to one’s soul, nor to the priest, nor to the ministerial priesthood which is at the heart of our Holy Catholic faith . *

I find this untruthful. Clearly, nobody here has been rehashing the Father’s sins just to relish in them. The ONLY reason folks have to keep reiterating the same stuff over and over is for the very few folks who remain in denial. How many times does Br. JR have to repeat the rule of obedience and the canonical law? How many times to we have to repeat that yes, Father WAS declared unfit for ministry, he WAS called guilty by his society’s authority, that the SOLT DOES have authority to do so, that there will be no civil trial for these allegations (the one civil trial has to do with breach of contract and false allegations that disrupted a business… and so forth.

No one came to this thread just to defame John Corapi. And those of us answering the ones in denial or to share our own pain don’t hate the man, understand that he is and always will be a priest, understand we all sin, and aren’t haters attacking him for the fun of it.

When new folks, or ones still in denial insist they are going to wait for some official court decision, the regulars here must rehash for the umpteenth time - this is what his superior authority at the SOLT did find (guilty of certain charges), and yes, they have the authority to do so, and no, there will be no further official decision unless John Corapi appeals to the Vatican.
As Pilate said, “What I have written, I have written.” That’s not really what he said, but the DR bible translates it that way. It works. 😃

What the Superior General has written, he has written. If there is no appeal. The verdict must stand.

If he chooses not to appeal, Father has two moral choices and one immoral one. I hope that he chooses one of the two moral choices.
  1. He can return to the SOLT motherhouse and submit to whatever Fr. Sheehan and the general council feel are appropriate disciplinary measures.
  2. Request for a dispensation from the SOLT and from the priesthood.
I was thinking that he could request for a dispensation from the SOLT and ask a bishop to incardinate him into his diocese. However, given the notariety of the situation, it will be tough to find a bishop willing to take the chance.

The immoral choice is to abandon the SOLT and the priesthood without the necessary dispensations. That makes you a renegade.

We are all sinners. As St. Teresa of Avila once said, “We have all betrayed him.” That’s why she prayed for the salvation of Judas Iscariot everyday. Now again, we must remember that we have all sinned and we must pray that people make choices that are good for them, even if they are tough choices. This is not easy.

Fraternally,

Br.JR, OSF 🙂
 
You know, I am a former Evangelical, now a convert (25 years ago) to the Catholic Church. These are very good and valid points that you are making, and should not be dismissed. I have to tell you, Protestants, many of whom are still eager to point out the backwardness of the Catholic Church, will welcome him with open arms. Do not be surprised if this happens. ** To many Protestants, he will be a hero for what he is doing in standing up to the “immoral” (Fr. Corapi’s own characterization) policies and procedures of the Catholic Church**.
This is awful.😦
 
This is awful.😦
I am not that worried about The Black Sheepdog being embraced by Protestants. They are way more outspoken about possible demonic possession, I was just listening to a Baptist preacher of some reknown here in Texas this morning, and he was talking about demons running someone’s life if they aren’t careful. The website and that graphic will creep them out big-time and they will not idolize someone who portrays himself like that.

I think The Black Sheepdog is only appealing to a very small group of outliers, the ones who feel somehow that they also “will not crawl under a rock and die.” That is the message he has been reinforcing again and again, that he will not submit to any authority. His attitude of victimhood is not attractive to most people, Catholics or not. And the black-leather Biker dude appearance won’t attract too many people either. He’d fit just fine in a biker ministry right now, except he can’t preach or teach!

Let’s keep praying that he comes to his right mind and drops all of this nonsense. I am still wondering, in fact it woke me up in the middle of the night, WHO is advising him? Who told him that putting a countdown clock on his Father Corapi website was a good idea? Who designed that graphic for The Black Sheepdog’s website? Is this all of his own doing, or as a 60-something year old man, is he being guided by others who are driven by their own agenda?
 
This is not personal knowledge, but public. He has talked about it many times, and has even gotten a DWI after he was ordained. Suffering from addiction does not make a person “bad”.
That’s what I mean, not based on personal knowledge beyond what little evidence which has been presented by SOLT publicly. It will be too presumptuous to make the claim that Fr. Corapi has had a “long history”, insinuating that the history is current. Yes, we all know about his drug and alcohol addiction before his conversion. Yes, there’s validity to point out personal experience with a relapsed alcoholic relative … BUT it’s unfair to generalize and pin it on Fr. Corapi. In fact, I’ve had also known several people who had drug and alcohol addictions but they were miraculously healed after surrendering their lives to Christ… and many are completely free and do not relapse. Yes, Fr. Corapi might have had made a mistake on ONE occasion of DWI almost ten years ago (I think there’s still some uncertainty about the identify of the person) but that does not mean he didn’t learn from the experience and stop the behavior.

I encourage you to read JREducation’s posts and the Rule of St. Benedict he has recommended. The superior of the community “rules” said:
I agree with the assessment. However, there’s nothing to suggest that he’s also living a luxury life. Nothing whether he lives in a lavishly furnished ranch, nothing about the “luxury cars” which may just be used cars he bought cheap as a hobbyist for all we know. The point is that it’s the love of “manna” which is sinful, not the mere possession of it .I agree that material possessionss can be a real distraction … and I also agree that community life is wonderful.

It seems to me that this whole scandal has made it clear that no one knows Corapi all that well. There are many of us that have listened to his talks said:
Agree. He’s just a man.

No one here is doing anything blindly said:
I’m only answering mom4mary’s strongly worded assertion that we, the TFC, lacked logical and moral faculties. I simply reworded her assertion by asking the same type of question. Truth is that we don’t really know all the parties involved in the investigation as to their personal spiritual disposition and even field expertise (that is, not just a paper-degree in some field). That’s some unexamined total trust in somebody.

I think it would be prudent to follow the shepherds that God has appointed over us. [/QUOTE said:
Yes, but not to the type compelling moral assent in everything without question (Haven’t we learn anything from the priest-bishop sex scandals?). I’m saying that Fr. Corapi is or is not guilty. I’m simply saying that there’s good evidence to suggest that SOLT may not have done a thorough job in the investigation. I’m pretty sure that Fr. Corapi is undergoing his own passions at the moment. No need to also crucify him so quickly.

I will be taking a break. This will be my last post on this thread. God bless everyone.
 
Yes, but not to the type compelling moral assent in everything without question (Haven’t we learn anything from the priest-bishop sex scandals?). I’m saying that Fr. Corapi is or is not guilty. **I’m simply saying that there’s good evidence to suggest that SOLT may not have done a thorough job in the investigation. **I’m pretty sure that Fr. Corapi is undergoing his own passions at the moment. No need to also crucify him so quickly.

I will be taking a break. This will be my last post on this thread. God bless everyone.
What is that evidence, franas? A blog written by someone who is obviously one of The Black Sheepdog’s supporters? What else, what other evidence do you have at your disposal to suggest that SOLT did not do a thorough investigation? Make it good, because you really have less reason to doubt that order and Bishop Sheehan than you do The Black Sheepdog.
 
That’s what I mean, not based on personal knowledge beyond what little evidence which has been presented by SOLT publicly. It will be too presumptuous to make the claim that Fr. Corapi has had a “long history”, insinuating that the history is current. Yes, we all know about his drug and alcohol addiction before his conversion.
Franas - I am neither presuming nor insinuating anything. Fr. Corapi has gone to great lengths to describe his history with addictions in his PUBLIC talks. This goes beyond what was presented by SOLT to what Fr. has said about himself. When you add up his own personal statements about his addictions to what was revealed by SOLT (and no, it wasn’t “little”), to his DUI as an ordained priest in 1999, it all adds up a long history of addictive behavior/substance abuse.

While you are on break, please, please, do some serious study about this man. At least read through the threads on this topic, both the open and closed ones, here at CAF. And should you decide to rejoin the discussion, I would appreciate your attacks on my posts - which have been relentless - to cease. I am weary of my words being twisted and my intentions being questioned by a person who seems to have very little knowledge of the subject at hand. What Fr. Corapi has done and continues to choose to do is heartbreaking. ** However, I support the Bishop of Corpus Christi and Fr.'s superiors and brother priests at SOLT, period.** I am sorry that you do not, but that is another issue, and it has nothing to do with me.
 
I’m only answering mom4mary’s strongly worded assertion that we, the TFC, lacked logical and moral faculties. I simply reworded her assertion by asking the same type of question. Truth is that we don’t really know all the parties involved in the investigation as to their personal spiritual disposition and even field expertise (that is, not just a paper-degree in some field). That’s some unexamined total trust in somebody.
Franas, it appears that you just want an argument for argument’s sake at this point, as others have also noted. With this posting, I have reported you to the moderators. I enjoy and welcome lively discussion on this or any topic, but I will not be attacked or have my words twisted like this. Please, study and argue THE FACTS.

Edited to add - “TFC” Team Father Corapi, :eek: I thought we were team Jesus Christ, the Pope Benedict XVI League…
 
When I was a new Catholic, I watched Fr Corapi’s entire Catechism series all the way through THREE times! God has used him mightily in my life and countless others. One thing I remember him saying in one of the videos is that the three greatest temptations of the devil are for riches, honor and pride.

When I first read the news about Fr Corapi’s fall, I was stunned and, of course, deeply grieved. But the devil was after him as all our priests. What a reminder how fervently we must pray for our priests!

And I have a vision . . . Fr Corapi will return. He will repent and will be restored to the priesthood. And when he does, what a glorious day it will be for the Church to see the enemy’s work unravel!! God isn’t finished with any of us yet, and surely not one of his priests.

em
 
And I have a vision . . . Fr Corapi will return. He will repent and will be restored to the priesthood. And when he does, what a glorious day it will be for the Church to see the enemy’s work unravel!! God isn’t finished with any of us yet, and surely not one of his priests.

em
I sincerely hope that you are correct.
 
And I have a vision . . . Fr Corapi will return. He will repent and will be restored to the priesthood. And when he does, what a glorious day it will be for the Church to see the enemy’s work unravel!! God isn’t finished with any of us yet, and surely not one of his priests.

em
👍👍
If his life story can be believed, he’s done it before. Nothing is impossible with God. :bowdown::bowdown:
 
Code:
That's what I mean, not based on personal knowledge beyond what little evidence which  has been presented by SOLT publicly. It will be too presumptuous to make the claim that Fr. Corapi has had a "long history", insinuating that the history is current.
It has been noted that you have not listened to his talks, and maybe this is true. His long history of substance abuse is not “personal knowledge” nor is it “little eveidence presented by SOLT”. It comes out of HIS OWN stories through many of his talks. It is public knowlege because it has been on the radio, TV, and his DVD’s.

It is not a “presumptuous claim” to read police reports of his arrest for DWI since he was ordained. Neither is the findings of SOLT “presumptuous claim” that he has been using drugs.

Now, maybe you don’t understand about addiction, and you may not realize that once a person has experienced certain physiological changes as a result of using drugs, they can never again return to a “recreational” state of using them.

I hope and pray that he has not relapsed, but frankly, I would much rather blame all this current scandal and his unpriestly behavior on a relapse than to think he is behaving this way while he is in his “right mind” so to speak.
Code:
 Yes, there's validity to point out personal experience with a relapsed alcoholic relative ... BUT it's unfair to generalize and pin it on Fr. Corapi. In fact, I've had also known several people who had drug and alcohol addictions but they were miraculously healed after surrendering their lives to Christ... and many are completely free and do not relapse.
Yes. I know this does happen. But it also happens, and many of us have witnessed this personally in loved ones, that years of prior addiction can cause early dementia, emotional dysregulation in seniors, and erratic behavior, even if the person is still abstitnent.
Code:
Yes, Fr. Corapi might have had made a mistake on ONE occasion of DWI almost ten years ago (I think there's still some uncertainty about the identify of the person) but that does not mean he didn't learn from the experience and stop the behavior.
I agree. But I also believe that SOLT has no reason to post falsehoods. They apparently received credible reports about more current substance abuse.
Code:
.. there's nothing to suggest that he's also living a luxury life. Nothing whether he lives in a lavishly furnished ranch, nothing about the "luxury cars" which may just be used cars he bought cheap as a hobbyist for all we know. The point is that it's the love of "manna" which is sinful, not the mere possession of it .I agree that material possessionss can be a real distraction ... and I also agree that community life is wonderful.
He gave promises to SOLT that he would support himself modestly.
…strongly worded assertion that we, the TFC, lacked logical and moral faculties. I simply reworded her assertion by asking the same type of question
Yes, I recognize the question. It is not just addicts that suffer from denial. De Nile. It ain’t just a river in Egypt…
. Truth is that we don’t really know all the parties involved in the investigation as to their personal spiritual disposition and even field expertise (that is, not just a paper-degree in some field). That’s some unexamined total trust in somebody.
SOLT chose a team, according to the Bishop’s direction, that did not have ties to the Bishopric or the SOLT. They chose persons who have a history of doing these types of services for the Church. To an extent, though it does boil down to Trust. Can the faithful trust God to work through those He has appointed as Shepherds, and Superiors? Clearly Corapi does not have this trust.
 
Yes, but not to the type compelling moral assent in everything without question (Haven’t we learn anything from the priest-bishop sex scandals?).
You are the only one here using the term “blindly” and “without question”. As has been noted, this type of obedience is anything but blind. The Superior of SOLT and the Bishop of Corpus Cristi have been installed in their authoritative roles through approved channels in the Church. Refusing to obey them, is refusing to obey Christ. Corapi is not being asked to do anyting immoral. He is being ordered to return to basically turn him self in to his community so that they can help him save his soul. He could have reported to the headquarters/'motherhouse on or shortly after Ash Wed. ,and spent his Lent in prayer, reflection and spiritual direction. It is true, he still might have ended up in the same state his is today, but what did he have to lose by investing 40 days in compliance to superiors?
I’m saying that Fr. Corapi is or is not guilty. I’m simply saying that there’s good evidence to suggest that SOLT may not have done a thorough job in the investigation.
I am quite certain this is true. Corapi did a fine job of blocking their efforts, first by filing a lawsuit against his accuser and refusing to withdraw it when ordered, and by then resigning, thereby effectively stalling any further progress in the investigation. What is concerning is that so much was uncovered using the little latitude available to them, that they found it necessary to make a public statement of their findings that he is not fit for ministry.
I’m pretty sure that Fr. Corapi is undergoing his own passions at the moment. No need to also crucify him so quickly.
We are made members of one another in baptism, and there are literally thousands of us that are willing to help him bear the burden of his struggle. He has not been willing to accept help from anyone. The only help he appears to want right now are “fans”, and what financial gain he can still glean from the recordings that he will no longer be allowed to sell.
Yes, but not to the type compelling moral assent in everything without question (Haven’t we learn anything from the priest-bishop sex scandals?).
You are the only one here using the term “blindly” and “without question”. As has been noted, this type of obedience is anything but blind. The Superior of SOLT and the Bishop of Corpus Cristi have been installed in their authoritative roles through approved channels in the Church. Refusing to obey them, is refusing to obey Christ. Corapi is not being asked to do anyting immoral. He is being ordered to return to basically turn him self in to his community so that they can help him save his soul. He could have reported to the headquarters/'motherhouse on or shortly after Ash Wed. ,and spent his Lent in prayer, reflection and spiritual direction. It is true, he still might have ended up in the same state his is today, but what did he have to lose by investing 40 days in compliance to superiors?
I’m saying that Fr. Corapi is or is not guilty. I’m simply saying that there’s good evidence to suggest that SOLT may not have done a thorough job in the investigation.
I am quite certain this is true. Corapi did a fine job of blocking their efforts, first by filing a lawsuit against his accuser and refusing to withdraw it when ordered, and by then resigning, thereby effectively stalling any further progress in the investigation. What is concerning is that so much was uncovered using the little latitude available to them, that they found it necessary to make a public statement of their findings that he is not fit for ministry.

I’m pretty sure that Fr. Corapi is undergoing his own passions at the moment. No need to also crucify him so quickly.

W are made members of one another in baptism, and there are literally thousands of us that are willing to help him bear the burden of his struggle. He has not been willing to accept help from anyone. The only help he appears to want right now are “fans”, and what financial gain he can still glean from the recordings that he will no longer be allowed to sell.
I will be taking a break. This will be my last post on this thread. God bless everyone.
I can certainly appreciate that the Truths which have come out are very difficult to bear.
 
I am still wondering, in fact it woke me up in the middle of the night, WHO is advising him? Who told him that putting a countdown clock on his Father Corapi website was a good idea? Who designed that graphic for The Black Sheepdog’s website? Is this all of his own doing, or as a 60-something year old man, is he being guided by others who are driven by their own agenda?
His new manager is a young man named Justin Meccia, who is a member of Skull Church, a nondenominational evangelical Christian outreach to young skaters, bikers, and rock music fans, in Kalispell, MT, where John Corapi lives. Skull Church uses the “dark” imagery adopted by many young people in this demographic, but attempts to transform it with a Christian message.

skullchurch.com/php/home/index.php

I am by no means implying that this isn’t a good and fruitful ministry of its kind, and nor were my earlier remarks meant to be derogatory toward non-Catholic Christians. I just see it as part of the pattern of moving away from a specifically Catholic audience, especially one that is devout in ways that many Protestants find problematic.

I have no idea who is influencing or advising whom, but this is the person to whom John Corapi has chosen to entrust at least the maintenance and promotion of his new image.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top