T
tomarin
Guest
I can’t help but wonder whether we’ll ever get to the bottom of what happened here.
I don’t know that we can necessarily fault a person for not displaying heroic virtue in the face of adversity. Certainly, if he followed the example of Padre Pio, that would have been laudable. But we need to be careful that we don’t confuse that with being morally obligatory (not that you are doing that, but just a general comment).I agree whole-heartedly with your post, tm30. I feel that he has taken a road straying from the road to Calvary, where he was probably headed.
This isn’t over by a longshot, though. It’s certainly a good thing to hope and pray he returns to his vocation, although he would likely have to permanently reliniquish his public ministry after all this.I agree whole-heartedly with your post, tm30. I feel that he has taken a road straying from the road to Calvary, where he was probably headed.
A priest is not called to follow the example of St. Pio. He’s called to follow the example of Christ. (In fact, it was the glaring lack of “heroic virtue in the face of adversity” that led to the molestation scandals which have driven an unknown number of souls from the flock. But I digress).I don’t know that we can necessarily fault a person for not displaying heroic virtue in the face of adversity. Certainly, if he followed the example of Padre Pio, that would have been laudable. But we need to be careful that we don’t confuse that with being morally obligatory (not that you are doing that, but just a general comment).
I completely reject any suggestion that John Corapi (or any man) has been somehow set apart by God such that he is above responding to the rules and authorities that apply to ordinary men. Even if one were to credit the above stories (which all appear to come exclusively from the person supposedly being afforded this unique divine attention), we do not have a tradition of excusing certain allegedly holier-than-the-rest-of-us individuals from oversight or from adhering to proper standards. If anything the opposite is true. Even St. Francis sought permission from the Pope to preach as he did, and submitted to Rome’s investigation of his stigmata. Even if there were some reason to believe that he was called to great works in the past, I don’t find it particularly holy or merit-worthy for a priest to refuse his superior’s request to conform to the rules of his order, to refuse to meet with his bishop before quiting the priesthood, or to threaten lawsuits to prevent his superiors from talking to his accusers. He is a good speaker, and I would like to believe he was well-intentioned, but neither excuses bad behavior or exempts him from scrutiny and oversight.Perhaps you don’t’ remember three seemingly minor incidents from the story.
When he was a boy about 9 or 10, he was playing in his grandmother’s yard when a woman came through and said, “Hi, Johnny.” He smelled an aroma of lilacs. At the time he didn’t recognize who she was and just assumed she was one of the many friend of his grandmother who were constantly coming and going.
At one point after he had lost everything to his drug habit and was living on the streets of LA and particularly down in the dumps, he was sitting on a park bench when an old woman came up to him, patted him on the head, and said, “Everything is going to be alright.”
Years later, during his ordination ceremony, a few seconds after he was ordained and proceeding back to his seat, someone in the audience caught his eye, and he recognized the same woman he saw in his grandmother’s yard decades ago. She mouthed the words, “Hi, Johnny,” and he smelled a sweet aroma of lilacs.
He told of these experiences in one of his seminars shown on EWTN about 8-10 years ago, when he had no reason to make them up. Now if you were his superior knowing this, would you want to take a chance that these women were not angels?
I like this post and for me the bottom line seems to be his leaving the priesthood.As the representative of Christ, his somewhat fast and furious decision to divorce the Bride, the Church, seems right in line with the times.
Why doesn’t he just put his faith in God, regardless of the outcome? Whatever we may “think” or what “circumstances” took place, at the end of the day, the calling of a priest is to emulate our Lord. This is a gargantuan cross, but it is a cross a priest accepts when he is ordained. He must be prepared to lay down his life, even when it is unjust, as in the case of our Lord. Instead, it seems to me he is appealing to the world (civil court instead of ecclesial) and hoping for the support of the “sheep”, which do not belong to him, but to our Lord, who is the Head of the Catholic Church.
There has been a lot of mealy-mouthed “well, but…” commentaries out there, but the fact is, by leaving the priesthood in defiance, Fr. Corapi is also rejecting the charisms of the Holy Spirit which endow him as a priest. He cannot divorce the Bride and still be a partner of the Holy Spirit, who remains the Holy Spouse of the Church.
I sincerely hope that he will come to his senses. But there’s a fine line between being “charitable”, and dumbing down the profound vocation of the priesthood, and its inseparability from the Passion of our Lord.
The blogger may have been in error then. I can’t find the blog (read it and moved on) unfortunately, and I’ve been unable to verify that he said it as well. Please disregard my earlier post as hearsay unless I or someone else finds something to substantiate it.I don’t recall Fr. Corapi saying he barely knew the woman.
Nice story but has nothing to do with this current scandal.Perhaps you don’t’ remember three seemingly minor incidents from the story.
When he was a boy about 9 or 10, he was playing in his grandmother’s yard when a woman came through and said, “Hi, Johnny.” He smelled an aroma of lilacs. At the time he didn’t recognize who she was and just assumed she was one of the many friend of his grandmother who were constantly coming and going.
At one point after he had lost everything to his drug habit and was living on the streets of LA and particularly down in the dumps, he was sitting on a park bench when an old woman came up to him, patted him on the head, and said, “Everything is going to be alright.”
Years later, during his ordination ceremony, a few seconds after he was ordained and proceeding back to his seat, someone in the audience caught his eye, and he recognized the same woman he saw in his grandmother’s yard decades ago. She mouthed the words, “Hi, Johnny,” and he smelled a sweet aroma of lilacs.
He told of these experiences in one of his seminars shown on EWTN about 8-10 years ago, when he had no reason to make them up. Now if you were his superior knowing this, would you want to take a chance that these women were not angels?
Fair enough. Believe me, I don’t disagree with you. The whole ordeal (and Corapi’s statement in particular) has both of my eyebrows raised.A priest is not called to follow the example of St. Pio. He’s called to follow the example of Christ. (In fact, it was the glaring lack of “heroic virtue in the face of adversity” that led to the molestation scandals which have driven an unknown number of souls from the flock. But I digress).
It’s not as if Fr. Corapi said, “I need time away from my ministry to deal with this situation and discern God’s will in all of this.” He positively acted to leave the priesthood all together. If he truly believes what he preached, how on earth does he walk away from such a sublime vocation?
Again, I hope for a positive return to his Holy Orders, but this is a man walking out on his wife when times get tough. Sticking around isn’t “heroic virtue”, it’s “duty”. And if that means suffering unjustly, a quick review of the Beatitudes will clarify whether or not that is a good thing or a bad thing.
The novena of the Sacred Heart begins this week. We should all offer it up for our priests, but especially for Father Corapi.
I just think he’s being punished for the sins of the child-molesting priests. I’ve worked in large bureaucracies and have noticed a pattern that goes something like this:… He is a good speaker, and I would like to believe he was well-intentioned, but neither excuses bad behavior or exempts him from scrutiny and oversight.
…Father Gerard Sheehan, regional priest-servant of SOLT and Father Corapi’s religious superior in the U.S., confirmed June 19 that the order’s investigation faced complications created by a civil suit filed by Father Corapi against the former employee who had accused him of sexual misconduct.
“When she left the company, she signed a contract that she would not reveal anything that happened to her while she was at Santa Cruz Media. Father Corapi paid her for this. Father was suing her for a breach of contract,” said Father Sheehan, though he did not specify why Father Corapi had initiated the non-disclosure agreement.
Read more: ncregister.com/father-corapis-bombshell.html#ixzz1PqcH5EVZThe civil suit against the former employee created a problem for SOLT investigators.
“In canon law, there can’t be any pressure on witnesses; they have to be completely free to speak. The investigation was compromised because of the pressure on the witnesses. There were other witnesses that also had signed non-disclosure agreements,” said Father Sheehan.
This post is to pass on factual information from Fr. Corapi’s superior so that people can be informed. Please remain charitable so that this thread is not removed. Thanks.He (Father Sheehan) expressed disappointment that Father Corapi chose not to remain in SOLT and to refuse the order’s invitation for him to live in community, leaving his Montana home. Father Sheehan said he had tried to arrange a meeting with Father Corapi before any final decision was announced, but had not heard back from him. Father Sheehan said that SOLT would issue a statement shortly.
“We wanted him to come back to the community, and that would have meant leaving everything he has. It would have been a drastic change for him,” Father Sheehan said. “We will continue to move pastorally and charitably, taking steps to protect his good name.”
Does that go for nuns too?I think this should teach the church one thing: professed religious should live in their community. Period, end of story. …