Fr. Z: a slap in the face?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JimG
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Finally, while I realize you want to push my comments into an attack on Pope Francis, sorry, I am not taking the bait. I am a Catholic and I like Pope Francis very much. I don’t agree with every thing he says, such as this recent statement, but in my comments, I was only explaining that modernism has been around and attacking the Church for more than 60 years.

God bless.
Oh, quite the contrary – I have no interest in hearing others attack the pope. What I find curious though is that discussions of him typically turn into a discussion of modernism. If what he says and does are not examples of modernism, I don’t understand why every thread on him brings up the topic.
 
I don’t understand why every thread on him brings up the topic
I suspect that there are threads about the Pope where modernism is not brought up and threads where modernism is brought up but have nothing to do with Pope Francis.
 
If you say so I’ll have to trust you. In my experience, the overwhelming number of Francis threads include someone bemoaning his modernist leanings.
 
No. I was using the language of those who believe he does.
I believe there are times he has modernist leanings, not always, but yes at times he does and what he says confuses Catholics, but he is the pope, and I was taught to respect those in authority, even if I disagree with them, so that is what I do .
 
Last edited:
Father forgot a group: Catholic parents and grandparents who have been working very hard and will be working hard trying to teach their children God’s desire and purpose for marriage and relationships.

They are all falling on their knees in deep prayer.
As one of the persons described, I must say that the Holy Father’s refusal to clearly and consistently proclaim the Church’s teachings on marriage and the family has made my job as a parent much, much harder. I can no longer trust the institutional Church with the upbringing of my children. Now I have to personally vet the Catholic schools and their staff to make sure that they haven’t bought into the media’s narrative of distortion and misinterpretation… a narrative that wouldn’t exist if our Shepherd wasn’t so nice to the wolves.

When I was a kid in school, I was often told by my friends, “you are too nice.” I never understood what they meant by that until I found out, years later, that many of these so called friends were talking about me and making fun of me behind my back. And worse.

When I would walk between classes, I would sometimes feel moisture on my back or cheeks. I found out years later that this was the bullies spitting on me. There was a lot more abuse from my classmates, but no one could get through to me because I thought it was impossible that all these people could possibly hate me.

I feel very sorry for Pope Francis because I see so many people exploiting his friendship and trust to harm the Church. But if I could go up to him and explain all this, he would just do what I did and dismiss it as impossible. Because I used to be him, in that sense, this helps me relate to and forgive the Holy Father for his failings. It also helps me to pray for him.

I hope these thoughts are helpful.
 
Thank you. These thoughts are very helpful and very good points. I relate to them as a mother who also finds her job as a parent much harder and also as someone who had a similar experience as yours while I was in high school.
this helps me relate to and forgive the Holy Father for his failings. It also helps me to pray for him.
I like this very much; forgiving and praying.
 
I find the constant undermining of the Magisteriums authority by Catholics claiming to be defending tradition, to be a dreadful thing for the faith of the young. It’s far worse than ‘progressives’ who aren’t quoting the early Fathers or scripture to support their radical ideas. We know they are unashamedly neo gnostic. But my parental guidance has been heavily focused on reassuring my own children and the next generation that we have the gift of faith to trust that the Church won’t lead us into sin because the Holy Spirit is with it.
 
If Pope Francis meant this seeming endorsement of civil unions as just an endorsement of a unique legal situation in Argentina, why on earth doesn’t he say so?
 
Last edited:
And I don’t need to cite any source. You know as well as anyone that I’m right.
Argumentum as populum fallacy, followed by an post hoc ergo prompter hoc.

As to the latter, one way to filter out differences is to see if the same Church has had the same effect everywhere. As this same Catholic Church whose numbers have been actually rather stable in the United States, but plummeted in Europe (since such things have been measured) sees increases and growth in Africa and Asia, there is not even good correlation, and no evidence of causation.

See the Change in Catholic Population Around the World | TIME Labs.
Over the past 115 years, the global Catholic population has more than quadrupled, from 266 million in 1900 to 1.2 billion in 2015, according to the World Christian Database. This growth mirrors the world’s soaring population in the same period, with Catholics hovering around 17% of the total population throughout.
You might be speaking of individuals though, and then you would be quite right.
 
Even Peter was rebuked by Paul.
When Peter came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he was clearly in the wrong. - Galatians 2:11

There is not evidence he was undermining him behind his back. I am not saying no one should criticize the Pope, but let us not a verse that does not apply. This is one Church leader explaining an error to his boss and helping him see his error, not some random priest dishing dirt.

Also, significant, there is no other case where Paul was at odds with Peter. I am always cautious with those who are a constant source of criticism of other people. It says more about them than it does anyone else.
 
Africa and Asia, there is not even good correlation, and no evidence of causation
Africa and Asia Catholics reject alot of the modernism found in the western Catholic Church.

Plus he didnt say Pope Francis but rather liberalism was leading people away.
the past 115 years, the global Catholic population has more than quadrupled,
These statistics are usually not correct because they dont take into consideration those who are Catholic in name only, or those who exit right after confirmation.
 
Last edited:
You’re kidding me right? Ultra-conservative, borderline Jansenist Catholicism, caused nearly my entire province of Quebec to lose its faith .
If I remember right this was something that happened in your own province, not everywhere, especially since Jansenism mostly died out in the late 1700’s.

Liberalism on the other hand has been spreading throughout the Church for many, many years. We were warned about it by Pope Pius X.

One of the largest denominations today is “ex-Catholics”. Non denominational churches are packed with them.
 
Last edited:
One of the largest denominations today is “ex-Catholics”. Non denominational churches are packed with them.
Here in Québec, most simply left the Church during the Quiet Revolution. Which happened to coincide with Vatican II time-wise, but make no mistake Vatican II is not why the Church emptied. In fact based on my contacts within the local Church where I visit (or rather visited due to the pandemic) multiple parishes each year with our schola, while the Gregorian chant is appreciated on an occasional basis, the vast majority of the small minority that remained in the Church did so because of Vatican II, not in spite of it.

Similarly, you won’t hear a sympathetic word (in the Church) in favour of Cardinal Ouellet (conservative) in his former diocese, either from laity or his clergy. Nor do you find too many Benedict XVI fans, but Francis fans abound.

It is what is, as the saying goes. I believe something similar also happened in Ireland. But it is simply wrong to say that “modernism” has driven out more people than conservatism. I’m willing to bet that many of the ex-Catholics in non-denom churches were in fact not driven out by modernism, but were driven out because they couldn’t find their place due to the Church’s rigidity on certain issues (the main one being divorce and remarriage).
 
This verse ABSOLUTELY applies, because whether you are for or against Pope Francis, his use of wording is unbearably vague and confusing. Much like how the early Christians would have been confused at Peter causing confusion by supporting the “old Jewish traditions” that was essentially causing scandal to the gentiles.

and Paul was a bishop, who travelled there to set things straight for the benefit of all Christians, I bet the priests in the area were confused as well. Its the reason Paul went.
 
Last edited:
the vast majority of the small minority that remained in the Church did so because of Vatican II, not in spite of it.
I think we will have to agree to disagree here. This has not been my experience. I also have anecdotal experiences that say different and that Vatican II took away the Church they loved. Not true, the Catholic church is still there but that was how they saw it.
I’m willing to bet that many of the ex-Catholics in non-denom churches were in fact not driven out by modernism, but were driven out because they couldn’t find their place due to the Church’s rigidity
As a Catholic revert who spent many, many years in non denominational Churches, one of the main reasons cited for Catholics being there is that the Catholic church has become worldly and has turned away from Scripture.

I agree there is a sense of dislike toward what they call legalism but that is mostly due to a belief in faith alone or in some a once saved always saved belief.
due to the Church’s rigidity on certain issues (the main one being divorce and remarriage).
This might seem to some as being a Church “rigidity” but it is Christ’s teaching on marriage and to look at it differently is modernism.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top