M
MagdalenaRita
Guest
Thank you, same for your comments. I will pray on it also…Thank you for your comments. They were very edifying. I’ll pray on this. Thank you!
Thank you, same for your comments. I will pray on it also…Thank you for your comments. They were very edifying. I’ll pray on this. Thank you!
Ireland was an external liberal takeover and this was well documented.I believe something similar also happened in Ireland
Having been born just 4 years before it happened and being a Francophone Quebecer, and having heard first-hand accounts of people just slightly older than I, I profoundly disagree. The Church kept Francophones a poor oppressed minority. People with 10+ kids in a poor rural economy had little means to educate their children, perpetuating the circle of poverty. Many people entered religious life simply to escape poverty and get a free education.So I find it very hard to believe that the Quiet Revolution was anything other than an external liberal takeover in which the Church was a covenient scapegoat.
Ah now I get it. Another conspiracy theorist.Ireland was an external liberal takeover and this was well documented.
Following the money makes one a detective or a prosecutor, not a conspiracy theorist.Another conspiracy theorist.
Yes, you make very good points. Thank you for posting.Following the money makes one a detective or a prosecutor, not a conspiracy theorist.
Right. The old Anglo nationalist culture was the oppressor. Not the Church.By the early 60’s, Francophones had enough of serfdom to British and American anglophones
I’m sorry but, in all charity, again this does not relate to the whole Church. This happened in your area, in your province, but it is not something that happened in the whole Church.One of my best friend’s wife remembers her father thundering out of the confessional swearing at the priest. They were poor, his wife was ill, and he confessed to using natural family planning to prevent further pregnancies. He was refused absolution ! For something perfectly licit!
Another case, a woman being refused absolution because she wasn’t either nursing or pregnant. She blasted to the priest that she was a widow!!!
Sorry but your theory holds little water. With all due respect, you are a convert looking at it from the outside. Those of us who are cradle Catholics and either lived with the pre-Vatican II Church here, or had parents who did, may have a slightly different take on it.
Next to last. I would say the last person we should fight against would be the Holy Father. And if criticism of him is not fighting against him, then neither is criticism against any particular priest - that Golden Rule thing.My point is, the last people we should be fighting against is the priests standing up for the true Faith,
They only took advantage of the situation.Right. The old Anglo nationalist culture was the oppressor. Not the Church.
Again I‘m not talking about the whole Church. I used my Church as an example to counter the argument that liberals do more harm than conservatives. No human, liberal or conservative, is immune from harmful behaviour.I’m sorry but, in all charity, again this does not relate to the whole Church. This happened in your area, in your province, but it is not something that happened in the whole Church.
In general you’re right, but I’m talking of a local Church that was, IMHO, heretic. And I’m not alone in that opinion.We are not better Catholics than those of the pre-Vatican II Church. Let us not look down on the very roots of our faith.
Wait, but now you are avoiding the fact that he’s saying things against the true teaching of the church. Homosexual unions whether civil or otherwise, publicly supports what is against God. Any priest speaking against this should be encouraged because being a Christian isn’t about acceptance, its about doing God’s will and helping your brothers and sisters get to heaven.Next to last. I would say the last person we should fight against would be the Holy Father. And if criticism of him is not fighting against him, then neither is criticism against any particular priest - that Golden Rule thing.
thank you, and yes, I understand that. It is sad what happened to your province at that time. I pray that there has been healing in that area and that Catholics there can realize that we have a beautiful faith with a beautiful history. Yes there have been sins and problems and ups and downs but God gave us an awesome Church, from the beginning and into the future.I’m talking of a local Church that was, IMHO, heretic. And I’m not alone in that opinion.
I can’t agree and I hope you will hear me out.They only took advantage of the situation.
I agree 100% here. I have staked out middle ground as it relates to Pope Francis…meaning I see people on one side who thinks the pope approving gay marriage is in the future and people on the other side who think he is a heretic.As one of the persons described, I must say that the Holy Father’s refusal to clearly and consistently proclaim the Church’s teachings on marriage and the family has made my job as a parent much, much harder. I can no longer trust the institutional Church with the upbringing of my children. Now I have to personally vet the Catholic schools and their staff to make sure that they haven’t bought into the media’s narrative of distortion and misinterpretation… a narrative that wouldn’t exist if our Shepherd wasn’t so nice to the wolves.
This ^^^^^True mercy tells the truth to save a soul.
Truth without compassion wounds and repels; mercy without truth is a comfortable form of lying.
I know Jesus didn’t mean that only those who He told us were hypocritical can be known and thereafter never known by anyone again. We’ve had many homilies over the years about the sin of the Pharisees and what it means. It’s quite clear that some people feel entitled to call out particular sins of others over and over but reject that others can call out their sins. That is the definition of hypocrisyMotherwit:
I would definitely not encourage anyone to interpret Scripture outside of the Church, absolutely, which is why I replied as I did. I think the time for calling Catholics who work hard to follow Church teaching, Pharisees, has got to come to an end.I’m not interested in interpreting scripture outside of the Church’s interpretation which is that the serious sin of the Pharisees is hypocrisy.
Following the Church of Christ does not make one a hypocrite or a Pharisee. In order to judge someone as a hypocrite you would need to read their hearts. Jesus could call the Pharisees hypocrites because he could read their hearts. He was God, we are not.