Gallup: One-Quarter of Liberals Say 'Extremely Proud' to be American | Breitbart

  • Thread starter Thread starter 7_Sorrows
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Quite right. Or at school functions where parents gather among other places in the community.
 
@7_Sorrows, are you on Facebook? If so, you should search for a video titled “American Vs. America: Patriotism.” There’s a difference between patriotism and nationalism.
 
So is this the quarter of Liberals that will be voting Republican in 10 years time? lol
 
dvdjs said:
40.png
joeybaggz:
I don’t think there should be any “special” laws for any “special” group.
Click to expand...
So if school books include straight families, then they should also have gay ones as well?
Or are the straight families special under the law?
Click to expand...
No, straight families are the proper order of life. Heterosexuality is the proper order of life. Homosexual couples, a woman wanting to marry her 21 cats, NAMBLA couplings, a man wanting to marry a pony, they are all “special” groups. No “special” laws for “special” groups.
You are really trying hard, aren’t you to legitimize the lavender mafia and their aims and goals, aren’t you.
 
joeybaggz said:
Heterosexuality is the proper order of life.
Click to expand...
In US law? Can you document that?
joeybaggz said:
Heterosexuality is the proper order of life. Homosexual couples, a woman wanting to marry her 21 cats, NAMBLA couplings, a man wanting to marry a pony, they are all “special” groups.
Click to expand...
I think that in our law, heterosexual and homosexual couples have equal standing; a woman wanting to marry her 21 cats, NAMBLA couplings, a man wanting to marry a pony have no standing.
joeybaggz said:
You are really trying hard, aren’t you to legitimize the lavender mafia and their aims and goals, aren’t you.
Click to expand...
Nope. I a trying really hard to develop a discussion about what the law is, demands, allows, and makes reasonable, as distinct from what one’s religious beliefs are, demand, allow, and make reasonable.
Virtue signalling does not advance the discussion.
 
Well here’s the endgame of your “discussion”. If you are so enamored with law, are you going to defend “the law” when someone enacts law to demonize, persecute, and end the freedoms of groups he/she/it doesn’t like. Make Catholicism illegal, maybe? (we are not in the majority). Ban all homosexual activity, criminalizing it and removing all offenders from society, euthanize anyone over 75 as they are a drain on society? And thousands of others. Laws that protect the citizenry in the Western world are based on Judeo-Christian principles. Every law in the U.S. is based on the concept that the rights of one person do not violate the rights of others. Majority rules. Teaching homosexuality in schools violates my right to have my children protected from such concepts. Again, there should be no “special” laws for “special” groups.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top