Likewise, you are hyperbolizing that this bill is aimed in any way at protecting children.
How far are you willing to go in the fake defense of straight children
And this is a ‘fake’ defense and ‘hyperbole’…why? Because you said so? Being exposed to homosexuality does have an impact on children. Having an activity normalized that brings harm to people does have an impact on children. Being taught things against their parents values impacts children and families. Being taught that they should consider whether they’re homosexual impacts children. Being raised with no father, or with no mother, by a parent’s choice, impacts children.
There are now a couple of writers, raised by homosexual couples, speaking out against it. I believe a link was just posted. This writer has said in other writings that he is contacted by other children raised by homosexual couples who feel the same, but are afraid to speak out, due to the harassment and vileness aimed at them by the ‘tolerant’ gay movement.
I’ve mentioned a friend who decided when her daughter was four that her daughter is a lesbian, based on a totally innocent comment. Why would my friend do this? Because she eats, drinks, and sleeps all this gay propaganda in our country to the extent that she sees it everywhere. As a result, her daughter is going to be one very confused young woman, having been told all her life she’s gay when she never was.
This is not good for children.
Would you be arguing that a bill aimed at “stopping Catholic propaganda aimed at children” proposed in the U.S. Congress would be a very narrow bill only affecting public school systems? No, of course not. Such a bill would almost certainly be used to invalidate any public display of Catholicism, including wearing crosses, talking about Christ in any public forum including churches, and probably having the chapels in the first place.
These are the kinds of arguments that get steadily more ridiculous: the attempt to force an argument on the premise that all ideas are equal and therefore should be treated equally.
What are the fruits of ‘Catholic propaganda’ that might entice a child into a lifetime of Catholicism? Carried to its natural conclusion, Catholic ‘propaganda’ would lead a child to a lifetime of service, love, charity, peace, modesty, humility, perseverance. The fruits of Catholicism are millions of hospitals, schools, charities, beautiful cathedrals, incredible music, paintings, and statues, feeding the poor, courage in protecting others, giving one’s life for another. Families in church on Sunday.
What are the fruits of homosexual propaganda? I’m well aware that there are flawed Catholics and good people who are gay and live conservative, even chaste lifestyles. But there enough studies and anecdotal evidence to show that much more *typical *of the gay lifestyle is promiscuity, licentiousness, self-indulgence, higher rates of drug and alcohol use and abuse, disease, and lowered lifespan.
From a
study:
Substantially higher proportions of the homosexual sample used alcohol, marijuana, or cocaine than was the case in the general population. Contrary to other reports, this was not accompanied by higher rates of heavy use, although homosexuals did show higher rates of alcohol problems. In the general population women consume less drugs and alcohol than do men, and substance use substantially declines with age. Neither of these patterns were found for the homosexual sample, thus creating overall higher rates of substance abuse.
