M
Mijoy2
Guest
Reformed Rob:
Rob, what is so disturbing? Love, understandiing, this is what (it appears to me) the Catholic Faith is teaching. Not a ticket to a special club.Here’s something from the CCC:
1260 “… Every man who is ignorant of the Gospel of Christ and of His Church, but seeks the truth and does the will of God in accordance with his understanding of it, can be saved. It may be supposed that such persons would have desired Baptism explicitly if they had known it’s necessity.”
Like, who does this rule out? Muslims who kill Christians are certainly doing the will of God in accordance with they’re understanding, and as far as we know, many of them were honestly seeking the truth.
What about the atheist who denies Christ, even after you share the Gospel with him time and time again? Maybe he’s just ignorant of the Gospel because you didn’t present it in such a convincing way.
What about the Arian who still thinks that Arius taught what Christ and His Apostles taught concerning the nature of God and Christ?
Certainly this doesn’t rule me out from final salvation at this time. Even though I’m a Protestant (Reformed at that) and I seek the truth and do the will of God in accordance with my understanding of it. I’ve heard many arguments for the Catholic Church’s “necessity of Baptism” but I see it for what it is, a theological smokescreen to cover up the fact that you teach that nobody has to be baptised to be saved!
I find the Catholic’s belief very disturbing indeed. But this post is not about “me.” Rather, the question was asked, and the challenge is implicitly presented to defend the “Evangelical belief.”