ROFLMBO!!! Those who earn the least work the least. You think that just because someone expends more physical energy that somehow that means that they work the hardest? That is simplistic logic. If such were true, then that means that my son-in-law works very hard, because he expends googles of time playing games, but does nothing to earn a living. “Lazy idiot” is what I call him.
$350. (which I presume is per month) seems like a very cheep rent.
If it were that easy the would be renter could just buy the property directly.
are any of those “80” sites verified or just whiners complaining that rent went up?
Here is data: 100% of all of the adults I know who are not poor are that way through hard work.
Which of course, is a very bad source of data. When we try to generalize from a convenience sample we often run into trouble because our convenience samples are not representative of the population as a whole.
Wages being the primary source of income seems to be a universal assumption with all of the break outs I have found only list wage and salary income. However I did find this intersting site for the top .01 percent of earners
LOL That is NOT a “generalization from a convenience sample.” That’s the facts of life. You work, you make money. You make money, you eat. You eat, you stay alive. It works 100% of the time for EVERYONE WHO DOES IT.
There were some pretty hard working people in North Korea who still starved to death. But, that was not the original question, the original question was not whether working hard is enough to sustain people. The original question was where do people get the wealth they need to invest in property. The claim was that it all came from hard work. My response was that in addition to hard work there are other sources of wealth. Inheritances, gifts and loans from relatives, borrowing a lot of money and getting lucky, etc. When someone claimed that all wealth comes from hard work, I asked for data to support such a claim and the data that I got was of very poor quality.
Who said ALL? I said most.
Even most requires some data to establish that it is true. For example, the best way to be in the top 20% of the income distribution is to be born there. When you go to Ivy league schools the students there are not poor kids who work hard, they are for the most part kids of the upper class. Even a lazy Ivy league graduate will usually do fairly well in the job market.
Just because someone has a genetic inclination to be a good worker, does not negate the fact they still have to work.
I know people who earn over $100,000 per year who exhibit none of these characteristics.
So are you paying them? If so, fire them or cut their wages. If someone else is paying them, then the people paying obviously see value in their work.
Unfortunately, this particular person works for the government, and actually he is valuable to his boss, only because he keeps things quiet. He keeps things quiet by his laziness. For example, I have a guy in my department who doesn’t show up for work when he is supposed to. I tell this lazy bureaucrat that my guy is not showing up for work, and his only response is: I am not fighting that battle.
HMM, works for the government…The same government you would like to see have control over my medical care???
Where did I ever suggest that? You really need to learn how to read.
so you don’t support obamacare?
Not on the least. The fact that you made some sort of strange leap to think I would suggests that your critical thinking skills are quite faulty.
