I am not suggesting a defense.
I am suggesting that we should be precise about what we claim and have a source.
The situation is bad enough without fiction being added to it.
I think the situation is bad enough without quibbling about what time it was after he stopped struggling that he actually died.
These are the relevant questions in terms of the greater question of police responding to a call about someone allegedly passing a fake $20 bill:
Was he treated the same as anyone else accused of the same crime?
Was he treated as if he may have made an honest mistake; that is, that he might not be guilty at all?
When he was apprehended, were the force and the techniques used proportionate? Not just proportionate to his size, but proportionate to his demeanor and behavior?
When he told the officer he was not able to breathe, what was the response?
When he stopped resisting, did the force stop?
Was the officer showing concern that he might injure the suspect?
Did the officers apprehend the suspect using techniques meant not just to have the lowest likelihood of injuring themselves (which is
entirely justified) but also with the lowest likelihood of injuring the suspect (which is also necessary)?