Oh, I get it…one atrocity justifies another
If offered the choice, what would you rather?
Would you chose to be waterboarded, or to have your brains sucked out of your head?
There is that difference to consider.
If you were faced with the horrible choice of three of your friends being waterboarded, or 50 million strangers being exterminated, which atrocity would you chose.
Well, I guess we already know that. Democrats are people who would chose even three terrorists over the 50 million strangers.
I suppose we could also consider the innocence of the 50 million versus the evil of the three terrorists. Here again though, I am not sure that such a consideration would hold much water in an argument against a leftist, for these terrorists are often considered freedom fighters against the imperialism of the West and the Jewish state of Israel.
As for myself, I am confident that the conscience and the justice systems developed in the West eventually comes to the right decision when it comes to the morality and the efficacy of waterboarding. Ergo, this explains the low numbers in the first place. The temporary discomfort of the three terrorists is not so much of a concern for me compared to the possibility of saving hundred or thousands from future terrorist attacks. I would be more concerned about what waterboarding does to the waterboarder or to the society that chooses it.
And I think that our societies have quite correctly rejected waterboarding, and are developing better ways of getting timely information from captured terrorists.
I am also galled by the feminization of our warrior values, and the princess and the pea syndrome where people are incapable of making the hard decisions it takes to win a war. Sometimes the people who are trying to kill us will get a hangnail as we fight back, and this really ought not to be a great concern for us. It is obvious to me that when you strip down Trump’s rhetoric and bombast and bluster and inconsistencies on the subject, this is what he is saying. This is what he is appealing to. It is just common sense that Americans ought to be more concerned for their own than for the welfare of the people who are trying to kill them. In war, people die. People suffer.
Get over yourselves.
Now what would change the equation completely if the 50 million lives on the other side were not really considered an atrocity, but 50 million glorified sperm.
Indeed, any argument that in any way thinks that the two ‘atrocities’ are in any way comparable would be completely inane and incomprehensible, if those 50 million strangers were actually considered to be in possession of the value and the worth of a human life in the first place.