Gingrich: John Bolton will be my secretary of state

  • Thread starter Thread starter gilliam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don’t know about 99.9%. But you’re right. And perhaps I should have been paying attention more when he said there is not a red or blue America but a United States of America. But I do think he has led or governed more from the center in his attempts to compromise. More along the lines of Bill Clinton. The difference is today the other side has been against just about anything proposed by Barack Obama.
You mean like when he compromised on the Health Care bill? But then he was only compromising with other democrats - and the "compromise consisted of buying their votes (the Louisiana Purchase, Cornhusker Kickback, Florida Flimflam, etc…)
 
Ok this is going to come as a complete shocker I know to a lot you. Sit down for this one. But there are some of us who don’t necessarily think Obama is perfect but still support him over the alternative. I know total shock, huh. :eek:

See we just believe he is overall the better of the 2 major candidates regardless of who the GOP chooses from this field. 🤷

Take me for instance since I can only speak for myself. Healthcare has always been a very huge life issue to me .I personally support a single payer healthcare system among all the various imperfect models but would have at least preferred a public option. Single payer was not even on the table. Was I disappointed we didn’t even get a public option? You betcha. Still am. But one thing I know is I can not count on any Republicans to support such a plan to care for our sick who can not afford adequate care under our current system. Oh sure they go to the ER people will say. Who do think is paying for those costly ER trips? Someone if not those patients. In any case I believe “Obamacare” as it is known in these circles, aka the Affordable Care Act, was better than nothing and the status quo. Republicans have been in power and never emphasized or prioritized doing anything to fix our nation’s healthcare problems prior to Obama.

I am also a big advocate in these budgetary times of raising taxes on those who have most benefited from this economy and who can most afford to pay more. Asking them to sacrifice a bit more by going back to their tax rates of the 90s was not too much to ask instead of wanting the less fortunate to sacrifice the most by budgetary cuts in programs many people need and depend on in which to live and survive. Now before anyone decides to say raising these taxes will not solve the entire budgetary matter, no one including Obama has said it will. But it should be a part of the equation or solution. Revenues on the table as the saying goes. So was I disappointed Obama went along with an extension of these tax cuts for the rich a yr ago? You betcha. Still am. But at the same time I wanted to see unemployment benefits for instance extended and knew he had to compromise.

On the foreign policy front if a Republican POTUS had been Commander in Chief when Osama bin Laden was found, we would never have heard the end of praisies for that Commander in Chief.

I also supported the ending of DADT.

Do I support the Republican assault on unions and middle class workers as done in Wisconson and attempted in Ohio. No.

Is the economy still bad for too many. Yes. But would unemployment had been even worse if not for what jobs were saved by the stimulus. Of course.

Have I agreed with Obama’s leadership on everything? No. I could vote 3rd party. We have had for instance the Green party where I live which has usually been on the ballot. But I know by doing so I would be helping the candidate with whom I disagree with more between the major 2 who have a chance to be POTUS.

I could go on. But I don’t expect the vast majority here on this forum to agree. It is afterall a very politically conservative forum with most in opposition of Barack Obama. But I hope this at least helps with your question coming from a different political perspective than yours. God bless you and peace. 🙂
👍👍👍!Thanks for hanging in here with this circle of lovelies,Matt!
What else to say but, Lord help the rest of us if they get what they deserve! What a bunch of no hope-ers they have to choose from:rolleyes:Peace,Carlan
 
Ok this is going to come as a complete shocker I know to a lot you. Sit down for this one. But there are some of us who don’t necessarily think Obama is perfect but still support him over the alternative. I know total shock, huh. :eek:

See we just believe he is overall the better of the 2 major candidates regardless of who the GOP chooses from this field. 🤷

Take me for instance since I can only speak for myself. Healthcare has always been a very huge life issue to me .I personally support a single payer healthcare system among all the various imperfect models but would have at least preferred a public option. Single payer was not even on the table. Was I disappointed we didn’t even get a public option? You betcha. Still am. But one thing I know is I can not count on any Republicans to support such a plan to care for our sick who can not afford adequate care under our current system. Oh sure they go to the ER people will say. Who do think is paying for those costly ER trips? Someone if not those patients. In any case I believe “Obamacare” as it is known in these circles, aka the Affordable Care Act, was better than nothing and the status quo. Republicans have been in power and never emphasized or prioritized doing anything to fix our nation’s healthcare problems prior to Obama.

I am also a big advocate in these budgetary times of raising taxes on those who have most benefited from this economy and who can most afford to pay more. Asking them to sacrifice a bit more by going back to their tax rates of the 90s was not too much to ask instead of wanting the less fortunate to sacrifice the most by budgetary cuts in programs many people need and depend on in which to live and survive. Now before anyone decides to say raising these taxes will not solve the entire budgetary matter, no one including Obama has said it will. But it should be a part of the equation or solution. Revenues on the table as the saying goes. So was I disappointed Obama went along with an extension of these tax cuts for the rich a yr ago? You betcha. Still am. But at the same time I wanted to see unemployment benefits for instance extended and knew he had to compromise.

On the foreign policy front if a Republican POTUS had been Commander in Chief when Osama bin Laden was found, we would never have heard the end of praisies for that Commander in Chief.

I also supported the ending of DADT.

Do I support the Republican assault on unions and middle class workers as done in Wisconson and attempted in Ohio. No.

Is the economy still bad for too many. Yes. But would unemployment had been even worse if not for what jobs were saved by the stimulus. Of course.

Have I agreed with Obama’s leadership on everything? No. I could vote 3rd party. We have had for instance the Green party where I live which has usually been on the ballot. But I know by doing so I would be helping the candidate with whom I disagree with more between the major 2 who have a chance to be POTUS.

I could go on. But I don’t expect the vast majority here on this forum to agree. It is afterall a very politically conservative forum with most in opposition of Barack Obama. But I hope this at least helps with your question coming from a different political perspective than yours. God bless you and peace. 🙂
What if I don’t want to live in this “America” that you want to transform this place in to? Why do YOU get to impose your will on ME?
 
Ok this is going to come as a complete shocker I know to a lot you. Sit down for this one. But there are some of us who don’t necessarily think Obama is perfect but still support him over the alternative. I know total shock, huh. :eek:

See we just believe he is overall the better of the 2 major candidates regardless of who the GOP chooses from this field. 🤷

Take me for instance since I can only speak for myself. Healthcare has always been a very huge life issue to me .I personally support a single payer healthcare system among all the various imperfect models but would have at least preferred a public option. Single payer was not even on the table. Was I disappointed we didn’t even get a public option? You betcha. Still am. But one thing I know is I can not count on any Republicans to support such a plan to care for our sick who can not afford adequate care under our current system. Oh sure they go to the ER people will say. Who do think is paying for those costly ER trips? Someone if not those patients. In any case I believe “Obamacare” as it is known in these circles, aka the Affordable Care Act, was better than nothing and the status quo. Republicans have been in power and never emphasized or prioritized doing anything to fix our nation’s healthcare problems prior to Obama.

I am also a big advocate in these budgetary times of raising taxes on those who have most benefited from this economy and who can most afford to pay more. Asking them to sacrifice a bit more by going back to their tax rates of the 90s was not too much to ask instead of wanting the less fortunate to sacrifice the most by budgetary cuts in programs many people need and depend on in which to live and survive. Now before anyone decides to say raising these taxes will not solve the entire budgetary matter, no one including Obama has said it will. But it should be a part of the equation or solution. Revenues on the table as the saying goes. So was I disappointed Obama went along with an extension of these tax cuts for the rich a yr ago? You betcha. Still am. But at the same time I wanted to see unemployment benefits for instance extended and knew he had to compromise.

On the foreign policy front if a Republican POTUS had been Commander in Chief when Osama bin Laden was found, we would never have heard the end of praisies for that Commander in Chief.

I also supported the ending of DADT.

Do I support the Republican assault on unions and middle class workers as done in Wisconson and attempted in Ohio. No.

Is the economy still bad for too many. Yes. But would unemployment had been even worse if not for what jobs were saved by the stimulus. Of course.

Have I agreed with Obama’s leadership on everything? No. I could vote 3rd party. We have had for instance the Green party where I live which has usually been on the ballot. But I know by doing so I would be helping the candidate with whom I disagree with more between the major 2 who have a chance to be POTUS.

I could go on. But I don’t expect the vast majority here on this forum to agree. It is afterall a very politically conservative forum with most in opposition of Barack Obama. But I hope this at least helps with your question coming from a different political perspective than yours. God bless you and peace. 🙂
Very well done. Politics 101 according to Cmatt. I think you have done a good job of explaining how left/liberal Democrats feel. Judging from your posts this is no surprise. I think this election is indeed about two conflicting views of the future of America. Will we continue to trash the constitution, allow the govt. to further encroach into every aspect of our lives, support the abortion of our unborn, the undermining of traditional marriage (which is the source of health and strength of our society), trickle-down immorality? The government which can give you anything - including that all important “healthcare for all” can take away anything- including your rights if you still believe in them. The other view is simple: we should promote a culture of life, minimal government, and living within our means. We need to allow business to flourish, not declare war on business - that is, if you want more jobs. The principle of subsidiarity - our problems should be handled at the lowest level of government. Instead, we have liberals who think our problems should be dealt with by a federal bureaucracy funded by the taxpayers. The choice is simple, we are going to get back to what America is truly about- the constitution, limited govt. and virtues, or we are going to make the brave new world Cmatt is proposing and become ever more dependant on the government/daddy to provide for us and tell us what to do. Trust me, eventually you won’t like what the bureaucrats are telling you what to do, but then it will be too late. The brave new world is not America, Cmatt, but something far different. You can rethink this, follow a different path and provide for the needs of the poor. We need not go the route you’re proposing. I hope you and others who think like you figure it out before its too late.

Ishii
 
Very well done. Politics 101 according to Cmatt. I think you have done a good job of explaining how left/liberal Democrats feel. Judging from your posts this is no surprise. I think this election is indeed about two conflicting views of the future of America. Will we continue to trash the constitution, allow the govt. to further encroach into every aspect of our lives, support the abortion of our unborn, the undermining of traditional marriage (which is the source of health and strength of our society), trickle-down immorality? The government which can give you anything - including that all important “healthcare for all” can take away anything- including your rights if you still believe in them. The other view is simple: we should promote a culture of life, minimal government, and living within our means. We need to allow business to flourish, not declare war on business - that is, if you want more jobs. The principle of subsidiarity - our problems should be handled at the lowest level of government. Instead, we have liberals who think our problems should be dealt with by a federal bureaucracy funded by the taxpayers. The choice is simple, we are going to get back to what America is truly about- the constitution, limited govt. and virtues, or we are going to make the brave new world Cmatt is proposing and become ever more dependant on the government/daddy to provide for us and tell us what to do. Trust me, eventually you won’t like what the bureaucrats are telling you what to do, but then it will be too late. The brave new world is not America, Cmatt, but something far different. You can rethink this, follow a different path and provide for the needs of the poor. We need not go the route you’re proposing. I hope you and others who think like you figure it out before its too late.

Ishii
👍👍
 
Which was exactly zero…I am guessing. 🤷 I would like for someone…anyone, to explain why they enjoy Obama’s leadership as POTUS. What has he done that has helped our country’s economic ills? Anyone…anyone…Bueller, Bueller.:rolleyes:
Actually, no. I have been reexamining Mr. Gingrich’s positions on a variety of issues, even overlooking past mistakes he made when he was Speaker. I like him more than I do a few others running for the nomination, but then he comes out and plays ideological games hoping to capture that far right wing of the party. I’m not sure why you think my desire not to support Mr. Gingrich for the Republican nomination means I must support Mr. Obama. You do realize that President Obama is not running for the Republican nomination, don’t you?
 
I suspect that Newt only had two chances to get your vote anyway-little and none:)
See my previous post. I was actually hoping that Mr. Gingrich would serve as a viable alternative to the other candidates, but a desire to have John Bolton serve as Secretary of State is a bit like hoping the Korean War will flare up again. If you live in the Far East, John Bolton is not exactly the most comforting person to have in charge of foreign affairs.
 
Ok this is going to come as a complete shocker I know to a lot you. Sit down for this one. But there are some of us who don’t necessarily think Obama is perfect but still support him over the alternative. I know total shock, huh. :eek:

See we just believe he is overall the better of the 2 major candidates regardless of who the GOP chooses from this field. 🤷

Take me for instance since I can only speak for myself. Healthcare has always been a very huge life issue to me .I personally support a single payer healthcare system among all the various imperfect models but would have at least preferred a public option. Single payer was not even on the table. Was I disappointed we didn’t even get a public option? You betcha. Still am. But one thing I know is I can not count on any Republicans to support such a plan to care for our sick who can not afford adequate care under our current system. Oh sure they go to the ER people will say. Who do think is paying for those costly ER trips? Someone if not those patients. In any case I believe “Obamacare” as it is known in these circles, aka the Affordable Care Act, was better than nothing and the status quo. Republicans have been in power and never emphasized or prioritized doing anything to fix our nation’s healthcare problems prior to Obama.

I am also a big advocate in these budgetary times of raising taxes on those who have most benefited from this economy and who can most afford to pay more. Asking them to sacrifice a bit more by going back to their tax rates of the 90s was not too much to ask instead of wanting the less fortunate to sacrifice the most by budgetary cuts in programs many people need and depend on in which to live and survive. Now before anyone decides to say raising these taxes will not solve the entire budgetary matter, no one including Obama has said it will. But it should be a part of the equation or solution. Revenues on the table as the saying goes. So was I disappointed Obama went along with an extension of these tax cuts for the rich a yr ago? You betcha. Still am. But at the same time I wanted to see unemployment benefits for instance extended and knew he had to compromise.

On the foreign policy front if a Republican POTUS had been Commander in Chief when Osama bin Laden was found, we would never have heard the end of praisies for that Commander in Chief.

I also supported the ending of DADT.

Do I support the Republican assault on unions and middle class workers as done in Wisconson and attempted in Ohio. No.

Is the economy still bad for too many. Yes. But would unemployment had been even worse if not for what jobs were saved by the stimulus. Of course.

Have I agreed with Obama’s leadership on everything? No. I could vote 3rd party. We have had for instance the Green party where I live which has usually been on the ballot. But I know by doing so I would be helping the candidate with whom I disagree with more between the major 2 who have a chance to be POTUS.

I could go on. But I don’t expect the vast majority here on this forum to agree. It is afterall a very politically conservative forum with most in opposition of Barack Obama. But I hope this at least helps with your question coming from a different political perspective than yours. God bless you and peace. 🙂
Kudos to you for such a massively excellent post, Matt. The kind of post I wish I had written.
 
Now, as to the original subject of this thread—John Bolton was frequently labelled “Bonkers Bolton” by Gordon Prather, when Gordon still had his regular column at antiwar.com and wnd.com.

To find out why, people need to go read Mr. Prather’s archived columns.
 
Now, as to the original subject of this thread—John Bolton was frequently labelled “Bonkers Bolton” by Gordon Prather, when Gordon still had his regular column at antiwar.com and wnd.com.

To find out why, people need to go read Mr. Prather’s archived columns.
An author on antiwar doens’t like a conservative?? Color me astounded.

I’ve heard Mother Jones and CPUSA also doesn’t care for him!
 
Now, as to the original subject of this thread—John Bolton was frequently labelled “Bonkers Bolton” by Gordon Prather, when Gordon still had his regular column at antiwar.com and wnd.com.

To find out why, people need to go read Mr. Prather’s archived columns.
Who is Gordon Prather and why should I care?
 
An author on antiwar doens’t like a conservative?? Color me astounded.

I’ve heard Mother Jones and CPUSA also doesn’t care for him!
But what about World Net Daily? They don’t exactly fit your scenario there.

And you’ve obviously never read a significant sampling of Prather’s columns. His political stance is pragmatic. Go get educated. Read them.
 
Very well done. Politics 101 according to Cmatt. I think you have done a good job of explaining how left/liberal Democrats feel. Judging from your posts this is no surprise. I think this election is indeed about two conflicting views of the future of America. Will we continue to trash the constitution, allow the govt. to further encroach into every aspect of our lives, support the abortion of our unborn, the undermining of traditional marriage (which is the source of health and strength of our society), trickle-down immorality? The government which can give you anything - including that all important “healthcare for all” can take away anything- including your rights if you still believe in them. The other view is simple: we should promote a culture of life, minimal government, and living within our means. We need to allow business to flourish, not declare war on business - that is, if you want more jobs. The principle of subsidiarity - our problems should be handled at the lowest level of government. Instead, we have liberals who think our problems should be dealt with by a federal bureaucracy funded by the taxpayers. The choice is simple, we are going to get back to what America is truly about- the constitution, limited govt. and virtues, or we are going to make the brave new world Cmatt is proposing and become ever more dependant on the government/daddy to provide for us and tell us what to do. Trust me, eventually you won’t like what the bureaucrats are telling you what to do, but then it will be too late. The brave new world is not America, Cmatt, but something far different. You can rethink this, follow a different path and provide for the needs of the poor. We need not go the route you’re proposing. I hope you and others who think like you figure it out before its too late.

Ishii
What CMatt and others don’t realize is that our goverment debt is only 10 years away from reaching the level of Greece: 126% of our GDP.

CMatt and others are deluding on thinking you can just pilfer more from “the rich” to continue to subsidize the out of control spending and campaign promises.

The consequences of the better part of 40 years of reckless borrowing have caught up with us, and the Democratic party, the “New Deal”, Johnson’s “Great Society” are to blame. Our government should be a fraction of the size it is now. Its girth is the result of electioneering politicians who promise the moon to gullible voters while using debt to push the costs onto our children and grandchildren.

Not on my watch.
 
What CMatt and others don’t realize is that our goverment debt is only 10 years away from reaching the level of Greece: 126% of our GDP.

CMatt and others are deluding on thinking you can just pilfer more from “the rich” to continue to subsidize the out of control spending and campaign promises.

The consequences of the better part of 40 years of reckless borrowing have caught up with us, and the Democratic party, the “New Deal”, Johnson’s “Great Society” are to blame. Our government should be a fraction of the size it is now. Its girth is the result of electioneering politicians who promise the moon to gullible voters while using debt to push the costs onto our children and grandchildren.

Not on my watch.
It goes back to Wilson and the establishment of the Federal Reserve. Once the Congress realized that whenever it needed money for whatever little pet project or entitlement they wanted, all they had to do was authorize the creation of new money from thin air, the writing was on the wall.
 
While I don’t agree with CMatt25 totally, he provides a strong antidote to much of the far right extremism we read here on CAF. Thank God America still has room for various points of view. I may have to settle for Obama myself, certainly if Gingrich is his opponent. Or, maybe a third party?
Code:
  **Back to John Bolton. I saw him last night **- I believe it was on Greta's Fox program. Bolton is wild-eyed, a dogmatic man dangerous to the future of the USA and the world. I simply couldn't imagine a reasonable president selecting him as Secretary of State. This is one of several reasons why Gingrich scares me. Would our nation go crazy with a Gingrich-Bolton combination? I'm afraid so.

  **Bolton is a neocon.** As someone has suggested the neocons initially were primarily Jews who had been on the far left - some of them Trotskyites or other socialist-types. They seem to have retained some of that Trotskyite mentality, which pushed for continual conflict (and hatred) until the world was remade in their image. 

  **I don't want to boast**, but I would make a better Secretary of State than Bolton. So would most of you. His thinking is so radical, so warped, that he - in my view - peddles a viewpoint that is dangerous to our long-term existence as a nation. How long would it be before he and Gingrich would get us into another war? Enough already! And his philosophy certainly conflicts with the teachings of Christ. Love one another. The Golden Rule. Etc.  

  May God bless America - and save us from Gingrich-Bolton.
 
You know when almost everyone in a group speaks out,such as in this particular forum,as a Republican, it is very hard for a Dem to get very far edgewise, so I admire the mettle of posters like Matt who persevere in their right to exercise and put forward their beliefs and opinions when opposed by such groups as the one here in this forum.
Wishing you all peace and goodwill this Advent season.
Carlan
 
** **Back to John Bolton. I saw him last night ****- I believe it was on Greta’s Fox program. Bolton is wild-eyed, a dogmatic man dangerous to the future of the USA and the world. I simply couldn’t imagine a reasonable president selecting him as Secretary of State. This is one of several reasons why Gingrich scares me. Would our nation go crazy with a Gingrich-Bolton combination? I’m afraid so.
Code:
  **Bolton is a neocon.** As someone has suggested the neocons initially were primarily Jews who had been on the far left - some of them Trotskyites or other socialist-types. They seem to have retained some of that Trotskyite mentality, which pushed for continual conflict (and hatred) until the world was remade in their image. 

  **I don't want to boast**, but I would make a better Secretary of State than Bolton. So would most of you. His thinking is so radical, so warped, that he - in my view - peddles a viewpoint that is dangerous to our long-term existence as a nation. How long would it be before he and Gingrich would get us into another war? Enough already! And his philosophy certainly conflicts with the teachings of Christ. Love one another. The Golden Rule. Etc.  

  May God bless America - and save us from Gingrich-Bolton.
I get you don’t like him but you never listed a single specific thing he’s done that you feel is wrong. But if you think calling him a bunch a names proves your point I think you just proved a few other points too.
 
I remember when John Bolton was our ambassador at the UN; he certainly did NOT pull any punches! I’d want someone who is not afraid to speak his mind and defend our interests!

As another poster here has already said, ‘He would be an improvement over the one we have now.’

Good choice, Newt! 👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top