Gingrich Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter gilliam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Here’s the relevant section, since you are afraid to take a peek:

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 29 > § 599
§ 599. Promise of appointment by candidate

Whoever, being a candidate, directly or indirectly promises or pledges the appointment, or the use of his influence or support for the appointment of any person to any public or private position or employment, for the purpose of procuring support in his candidacy shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if the violation was willful, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
Yawn… here is what he said. Glad I didnt click on Kos… they arent known for … uh… the truth.

“Certainly, she’s one of the people I’d call on for advice,” Gingrich said in an interview with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer. “I would ask her to consider taking a major role in the next administration if I’m president, but nothing has been discussed of any kind. And it wouldn’t be appropriate to discuss it at this time.”
 
Everyone keeps mentioning Newt’s baggage. Can someone please tell me what his baggage is?

I know that twice he started a relationship with his next wife before being divorced from his current wife, but aside from that what is there?
I’m more concerned with his ethics charge and that fact that his own party leaders kicked him out of the Speaker position and didn’t like the way he worked with people. In other words, his leadership ability.

I could care less about his marriage difficulties and past infidelities.
 
Everyone keeps mentioning Newt’s baggage. Can someone please tell me what his baggage is?

I know that twice he started a relationship with his next wife before being divorced from his current wife, but aside from that what is there?
Newt has always been known as a progressive in conservative clothing. Too many to list, but…

04/02/1987 – He cosponsored the 1987 Fairness Doctrine
10/22/1991 – He voted for an amendment that would create a National Police Corps.
03/—/1993 – He Voted for sending $1.6 Billion in foreign aid to Russia.
11/19/1993 – He voted for the NAFTA Implementation Act.
11/27/1994 – He supported the GATT Treaty giving sovereignty to the U.N.
04/25/1996 – Voted for the single largest increase on Federal education spending ($3.5 Billion) (also voted to establish the department of education in 1970)
04/10/1995 – He supported Federal taxdollars being spent on abortions.
09/25/1996 – Introduced H.R. 4170, demanded life-sentence or execution for someone bringing 2 ounces of marijuana across the border.
01/22/1997 – Congress gave him a record-setting $300,000 fine for ethical wrongdoing.
11/29/2006 – He said that free speech should be curtailed in order to fight terrorism. Wants to stop terrorists from using the internet. Called for a “serious debate about the 1st Amendment.”
02/15/2007 – He supported Bush’s proposal for mandatory carbon caps.
09/28/2008 – Says if he were in office, he would have reluctantly voted for the $700B TARP bailout.
10/01/2008 – Says in an article that TARP was a “workout, not a bailout.”
12/08/2008 – He was paid $300,000 by Freddie Mac to halt Congress from bringing necessary reform.
03/31/2009 – Says we should have Singapore-style drug tests for Americans.
11/15/2010 – He defended Romneycare
01/30/2011 – He lobbied for ethanol subsidies.
01/30/2011 – He suggested that flex-fuel vehicles be mandated for Americans.
02/13/2011 – He criticized Obama for sending less U.S. taxdollars to Egypt.
02/15/2011 – His book said that he believes man-made climate-change and advocated creating “a new endowment for conservation and the environment.”
03/15/2011 – Says that NAFTA worked because it created jobs in Mexico.
03/19/2011 – He has no regrets about supporting Medicare drug coverage. (Now $7.2T unfunded liability)
05/12/2011 – He was more supportive of individual health-care mandates than Mitt Romney.
 
Yawn… here is what he said. Glad I didnt click on Kos… they arent known for … uh… the truth.

“Certainly, she’s one of the people I’d call on for advice,” Gingrich said in an interview with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer. “I would ask her to consider taking a major role in the next administration if I’m president, but nothing has been discussed of any kind. And it wouldn’t be appropriate to discuss it at this time.”
Yeah, I’m not really convinced that the Daily Kos has a valid case.

I just found it strange that you would not follow the link to such a juicy story.
 
Newt has always been known as a progressive in conservative clothing. Too many to list, but…

04/02/1987 – He cosponsored the 1987 Fairness Doctrine
10/22/1991 – He voted for an amendment that would create a National Police Corps.
03/—/1993 – He Voted for sending $1.6 Billion in foreign aid to Russia.
11/19/1993 – He voted for the NAFTA Implementation Act.
11/27/1994 – He supported the GATT Treaty giving sovereignty to the U.N.
04/25/1996 – Voted for the single largest increase on Federal education spending ($3.5 Billion) (also voted to establish the department of education in 1970)
04/10/1995 – He supported Federal taxdollars being spent on abortions.
09/25/1996 – Introduced H.R. 4170, demanded life-sentence or execution for someone bringing 2 ounces of marijuana across the border.
01/22/1997 – Congress gave him a record-setting $300,000 fine for ethical wrongdoing.
11/29/2006 – He said that free speech should be curtailed in order to fight terrorism. Wants to stop terrorists from using the internet. Called for a “serious debate about the 1st Amendment.”
02/15/2007 – He supported Bush’s proposal for mandatory carbon caps.
09/28/2008 – Says if he were in office, he would have reluctantly voted for the $700B TARP bailout.
10/01/2008 – Says in an article that TARP was a “workout, not a bailout.”
12/08/2008 – He was paid $300,000 by Freddie Mac to halt Congress from bringing necessary reform.
03/31/2009 – Says we should have Singapore-style drug tests for Americans.
11/15/2010 – He defended Romneycare
01/30/2011 – He lobbied for ethanol subsidies.
01/30/2011 – He suggested that flex-fuel vehicles be mandated for Americans.
02/13/2011 – He criticized Obama for sending less U.S. taxdollars to Egypt.
02/15/2011 – His book said that he believes man-made climate-change and advocated creating “a new endowment for conservation and the environment.”
03/15/2011 – Says that NAFTA worked because it created jobs in Mexico.
03/19/2011 – He has no regrets about supporting Medicare drug coverage. (Now $7.2T unfunded liability)
05/12/2011 – He was more supportive of individual health-care mandates than Mitt Romney.
Now we are talking!

Romney, Santorum and Gingrich represent everything that the Tea Party threw out of office in 2010. And we know who the intellectual godfather of the Tea Party is…

They are either power-mad or delusional.
 
Article by the late Fr.Richard Neuhaus , on Mormonism ; he concludes that it comes closest to Islam .
Here’s an excellent article on the late Fr. Richard Neuhaus and the danger that Neoconservatism poses for Catholicism: “Bush vs. Benedict: Catholic neoconservatives grapple with their church’s Just War tradition” by Daniel McCarthy theamericanconservative.com/article/2005/aug/29/00011//

Here’s another excellent article on the same subject: “George Weigel’s Anti-American Jeremiad” by Michael Scheuer at antiwar.com/scheuer/?articleid=12186.

Enjoy!! 🙂
 
Yeah, I’m not really convinced that the Daily Kos has a valid case.

I just found it strange that you would not follow the link to such a juicy story.
They arent worth the effort to click on the link.
 
I don’t usually listen to AM talk radio but the other night I was going to work and there was this guy named Savage on. Now from what I could garner, this Savage character sounds like he is an Israeli-Firster and was really pushing for a war with Iran and so I couldn’t say that I agree with everything he was saying but he made an interesting point with regard to Newt Gingrich. He basically said that Newt Gingrich makes for a great soundbite, but he warned that Gingrich will destroy the Republican Party and hand Obama the election. Again, this was coming from someone who sounded like a neoconservative. LOL!!!
What is an “Israel-firster”?
 
Here’s an excellent article on the late Fr. Richard Neuhaus and the danger that Neoconservatism poses for Catholicism: “Bush vs. Benedict: Catholic neoconservatives grapple with their church’s Just War tradition” by Daniel McCarthy theamericanconservative.com/article/2005/aug/29/00011//

Here’s another excellent article on the same subject: “George Weigel’s Anti-American Jeremiad” by Michael Scheuer at antiwar.com/scheuer/?articleid=12186.

Enjoy!! 🙂
Which “Neo Con” is running for office?
 
I don’t usually listen to AM talk radio but the other night I was going to work and there was this guy named Savage on. Now from what I could garner, this Savage character sounds like he is an Israeli-Firster and was really pushing for a war with Iran and so I couldn’t say that I agree with everything he was saying but he made an interesting point with regard to Newt Gingrich. He basically said that Newt Gingrich makes for a great soundbite, but he warned that Gingrich will destroy the Republican Party and hand Obama the election. Again, this was coming from someone who sounded like a neoconservative. LOL!!!
Savage is hardly a neoconservative. He doesn’t match the Republican Platform either.
Savage has summarized his political philosophy in three words: borders, language, and culture. Some, including Savage himself, have characterized his views as conservative nationalism, while critics have characterized them as “fostering extremism or hatred.” He outspokenly opposes illegal immigration to the United States, supports the English-only movement and argues that liberalism and progressivism are degrading American culture. Although his radio delivery is usually characterized as confrontational and politically themed, some of his show involves ruminating on topics such as medicine, nutrition, music, literature, history, theology, philosophy, sports, culture, and personal anecdotes.

Since 2009, Savage has been barred from entering the United Kingdom, for allegedly “seeking to provoke others to serious criminal acts and fostering hatred”.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Savage
 
I don’t usually listen to AM talk radio but the other night I was going to work and there was this guy named Savage on. Now from what I could garner, this Savage character sounds like he is an Israeli-Firster and was really pushing for a war with Iran and so I couldn’t say that I agree with everything he was saying but he made an interesting point with regard to Newt Gingrich. He basically said that Newt Gingrich makes for a great soundbite, but he warned that Gingrich will destroy the Republican Party and hand Obama the election. Again, this was coming from someone who sounded like a neoconservative. LOL!!!
Michael Savage is a “Messianic Jew”. He is part of the uber-fundamentalistic part of the Evangelical community. He hates everyone. Seriously. I’ve listened to his show, and there isn’t a single person in public office he likes. Noone. They are all …crass words for prostitutes, so he says. He hates Catholicism, Hates mainline Protestantism. He like Jews. He like some fundamentalist Christians. I like listening to him, becuase I have never in my life heard one person with so much vitriol for his fellow man.
 
100 tea party leaders to announce support for Newt

CHARLESTON, S.C. — The Daily Caller has learned that 100 tea party leaders from 25 states will announce Thursday that they are supporting Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich and will form a coalition called Tea Partiers With Newt.
The news comes as signs appear that tea partiers here in South Carolina, which holds a primary Saturday, may be coalescing around Gingrich.

“My sense is there is a growing coalition behind Newt Gingrich,” Joe Dugan, who leads the state’s chapter of Tea , told TheDC.

A news release that will go out Thursday from the Gingrich campaign says the coalition will “help elect Newt and defeat Massachusetts Moderate Mitt Romney and then President Barack Obama.”

Read more: dailycaller.com/2012/01/19/exclusive-100-tea-party-leaders-to-announce-support-for-newt/#ixzz1jwW3FQ7q
 
Probably true. But you know what I always say about our electorate. That’s how we got in this mess in the first place. And any time you let the party “intelligentsia” choose the nominee ala McCain and Dole, you get in trouble.
Well, the party apparatchik is about to do it again with Romney.
 
To say that Newt Gingrich did not have a good performance in the debate last night is an understatement. Ron Paul took him apart. I haven’t seen a debate beatdown like that since Lloyd Bensten emasculated Dan Quayle.
You’re wrong! Everyone agrees that Gingrich won the debate!
 
Michael Savage - real name, Michael Weiner - is, as his radio name implies, harsh, belligerent, and bigoted. He is a hyper-American nationalist except when it comes to Israel which appears to have first claim on his loyalty. He is particularly crude and rude when he deals with illegal immigrants. While I certainly agree with his concern about porous borders, his condemnations are so vehement and incendiary that I find that listening to him is a waste of time. Tragically, too many ‘conservative’ commentators are really wild-eyed radicals who divide Americans and keep listeners in a state of perpetual alarm by exaggerating, stereotyping, misrepresenting, and outright lying.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top