4
4elise
Guest
I’m grateful that I don’t hold Glen Beck to be an authority in the Church…
I’m grateful that I don’t hold Glen Beck to be an authority in the Church…
See I missed that… you are a teacher!I, myself, may bring up the topic of bullying in my classroom. It’s an important discussion.
God Bless.
is exactly what GB had written on his board yesterday in the program. He also described the evolution of the term from Jesus to progressives and how it became perverted. You may not like his style, but he really doesn’t jump from A to H- he uses a chalk board and goes point by point. You posted while I was writing this, so I see that you’ve investigated some- for that I thank you and your credibility is more assured in my mind.“Forced redistribution of wealth with a hostility towards individual property rights under the guise of charity or social justice”.
andMinn. students protest as part of school field trip
While some may go on a field trip to the zoo or a museum, students from a Minneapolis charter school went to the state capitol to take part in a protest.
Sixth, seventh and eighth graders from Southside Family Charter School chanted, held signs, and demanded answers on welfare reform outside of Gov. Tim Pawlenty’s office Tuesday.
School director Eliza Goodwin said, “It is something that is absolutely part of our curriculum.”
Southside Family bases its curriculum around social justice issues and promotes demonstrations.
Now ALL student loans go through the federal government-paying for health care on the backs of America’s students-think there won’t be bias? Just try to connect some dots and youll be alarmed too. Even if he’s only 50% right, I fear for my kids’ future. I don’t prefer to take the Nero approach, fiddling while Rome burns. As I write this , GB is again warning against violence and advising people to turn to God, not react violently if they get frustrated.SEATTLE – The mother of a Ballard High School student is fuming after the health center on campus helped facilitate her daughter’s abortion during school hours.
So am I, and he has never claimed to be, so that would just be silly!I’m grateful that I don’t hold Glen Beck to be an authority in the Church…
No, no stroke, and were you implying lack of mental acuity? I don’t think my post sounded angry or that there was any disturbance of blood flow to my brain.Good Morning. Please don’t let this be your last post. Check in and let us know that you didn’t have a stroke. BTW Do you have health care? I have to go to work now so I’ll consider during the day if I want to take the time to respond. I’m sure there may be a teabagger event in your neighborhood so you’ll have a support group. I, myself, may bring up the topic of bullying in my classroom. It’s an important discussion.
God Bless.
agreed.The article posted by Via, the OP, is clear that Glenn Beck’s words were advising people to leave their Church if their priests preached social justice. Many later posts expanded on GB’s explanations, re-considerations, backtracking, ‘what-i-meant-to-say’ and so forth. Nonetheless this thread referenced the original article asking ‘has he attacked the Church?’ It seems to me that yes, he attacked the Church and he has been ‘making nice’ ever since.
It is pointless and uncharitable to describe another’s posts as “nasty” and it’s not allowed here.Kbam and Convert66, bravo. You have brilliantly dissected Via’s nasty comments. FWIW, it seems, from the examples provided here, that progressivism and critical thinking are like matter and anti-matter; it’s not possible for them to exist in the same space.
I think what could be said on this thread has been said, and I’m going to avoid it lest *my *bloodpressure raise.
Did either of you hear the actual show, or just peoples’ opinions of it? As I mentioned, I listen online and heard both sides of the ORIGINAL conversation and I assure you he meant leaving churches preaching progressive political causes under the guise of social justice and stated just that. No backtracking was necessary.The article posted by Via, the OP, is clear that Glenn Beck’s words were advising people to leave their Church if their priests preached social justice. Many later posts expanded on GB’s explanations, re-considerations, backtracking, ‘what-i-meant-to-say’ and so forth. Nonetheless this thread referenced the original article asking ‘has he attacked the Church?’ It seems to me that yes, he attacked the Church and he has been ‘making nice’ ever since.
What is his critics fail to do is listen to the entire conversation he had about social justice and the Catholic Church. For your convenience:
glennbeck.com/content/art…cle/198/37852/
And Catherina- It would be consistent of you to address your admonitions to those who would use teabagger to describe citizens who oppose the progressive decline of our country.was based, I’m reminded of 'eyes that will not see, ears that will not hear…" and will revert to the Serenity prayer before we collide any further.Thanks, Magdalina,Matter and antimatter is a good description…
…and for those who refuse to even read or listen the ORIGINAL broadcast on which this entire thread
kbkam
Catherina said and Ella agreed:
Did either of you hear the actual show, or just peoples’ opinions of it? As I mentioned, I listen online and heard both sides of the ORIGINAL conversation and I assure you he meant leaving churches preaching progressive political causes under the guise of social justice and stated just that. No backtracking was necessary.
Vasian posted @290 quoting transcripts of an interview.
I posted
What is his critics fail to do is listen to the entire conversation he had about social justice and the Catholic Church. For your convenience:
glennbeck.com/content/art…cle/198/37852/
CONDUCT RULES for CA
Messages posted to this board must be polite and free of personal attacks, threats, and crude or sexually-explicit language, rude comments and innuendo.
I did address it- I suggest you look it up, so code words don’t slip by-just to be consistent.Teabagger Via, do you use this term to describe the TEA Party (taxed enough already) purposely? As I’ve gathered from blogs and sites you’ve referenced, I can see how you’ve adopted that vile term. Do you know what it means? Look up ‘teabagging’ on Wiki. I will not post it here. One of the Saul Alinsky tactics the left uses, is to mock and denigrate their opponents, so people won’t be inclined to get past the slurs and really investigate-oh I see now , It worked on you with GB. Now you’ve confirmed where you are coming from…
If you are fully aware of the reference above and continue to use it, it’s easy to be skeptical of the sincerity of your “God Bless”.
I’m not asserting anything. It sounds to me like St. Paul is doing the asserting.By sharing this exhortation from St. Paul do you assert that those who do without today do so because they will not work? Not that they can not find work? Not that they do not have the same opportunities for education?
associatedcontent.com/article/2380758/teabagger_a_popularly_approved_application.html?cat=9I did address it- I suggest you look it up, so code words don’t slip by-just to be consistent.
Teabagger:
Good. You addressed itI did address it- I suggest you look it up, so code words don’t slip by-just to be consistent.
Sorry if my question was not clear.I’m not asserting anything. It sounds to me like St. Paul is doing the asserting.
:clapping:The tone on this and so many threads sadly seems indicative of the intolerance (on both sides of the issue) many have today for people who they disagree with.
Does anyone think that identifying oneself and others with labels ‘conservative’ or ‘progressive’ is destructive? Vilifying these labels with name calling - attributing motivation, saying that the other is ‘less’ or ‘stupid’ or ‘…’
I think the media which finds it much more entertaining (rating generating) to report on a fight than on an agreement feeds into the differences, and we are all guilty of picking up what they throw.
I believe that GB and others just keep ramping it up further and further - feeding the “them / vs / us” ---- I think this is MUCH more destructive -
I know this if off topic a bit… **does anyone think this matters **- am I way off??
If this is a summary of the posted article, then I fear the reading problem has reared its ugly head again.Teabagger:
- one who carries large bags of packaged tea for shipment.
- a man that squats on top of a womens face and lowers his g******s into her mouth during sex, known as “teabagging”
- one who has a job or talent that is low in social status
- a person who is unaware that they have said or done something foolish, childlike, noobish, lame, or inconvenient.
- also see “fgbg”, “lamer”, “noob”
I think you are right on the money. These entertainers like beck and Limbaugh are ramping up the rhetoric towards violence. 10 congressmen have asked for portection for their families upon receiving threats after the health care vote. Offices are being vandalized, gas lines cuts, vile messages left on recordrs. Black members of congress are addressed with the n word. The list goes on and on.The tone on this and so many threads sadly seems indicative of the intolerance (on both sides of the issue) many have today for people who they disagree with.
Does anyone think that identifying oneself and others with labels ‘conservative’ or ‘progressive’ is destructive? Vilifying these labels with name calling - attributing motivation, saying that the other is ‘less’ or ‘stupid’ or ‘…’
I think the media which finds it much more entertaining (rating generating) to report on a fight than on an agreement feeds into the differences, and we are all guilty of picking up what they throw.
I believe that GB and others just keep ramping it up further and further - feeding the “them / vs / us” ---- I think this is MUCH more destructive -
I know this if off topic a bit… does anyone think this matters - am I way off??