Glenn Beck says to run away from churches who preach social justice?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Via_Dolorosa
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Surely you jest…you would trust this corrupt government to be so kind-hearted as to help the poor? It’s all about control and power with little regard for the poor.
Oh, I’ve very serious. Let’s for argument’s sake say that the government is jindeed corrupt…even evil people have been known to do good things for those who matter to them: “Do not even tax collectors and sinners do the same…” I would assume that, if only for mercenary reasons, the electorate does to some degree matter to the “corrupt” government.

I have known people who will show compassion to strangers (even if only for the boost to their reputations) but who haven’t been inside a church since they got old enough to decide for themselves. So no, I am not joking at all.
 
Oh, I’ve very serious. Let’s for argument’s sake say that the government is jindeed corrupt…even evil people have been known to do good things for those who matter to them: “Do not even tax collectors and sinners do the same…” I would assume that, if only for mercenary reasons, the electorate does to some degree matter to the “corrupt” government.

I have known people who will show compassion to strangers (even if only for the boost to their reputations) but who haven’t been inside a church since they got old enough to decide for themselves. So no, I am not joking at all.
I think it’s called “civilized nation”, as in “No civilized nation lets people die and then rot in the street.”
The opposite of this is “I’ve got mine, and it’s all mine and nobody helped me get it, I did it all by myself, completely independently of another human being, and you can’t make me give any of it to anyone else…so there!” (Of course, they are usually talking about money).
Well, good luck with that.
We are all dependent on one another at any given time in our lives.
The whole Glenn Beck ideology is based on being 'independent" and, well, selfish. And not thought out, and not based on Matthew 25.

Even Bill Gates and Oprah give away money, not because of religious beliefs, but for a tax break or whatever. I think Scrooge McDuck used to sit on his pile of money and count it and run it through his feathered fingers. What fun. (I’m pretty tired right now.:))
 
Now then: Mr. Beck. I do confess to feeling uncharitable towards him. His “entertainment” makes cruel judgements, is polarizing, and I believe has led many a conservative to stray from helping those who work with the poor; “Socialism! Communism!” blah blah blah. And yes, the comments about “Social Justice” in Church truly did put me over the edge. That was the final straw. And then, that’s not good for me, so I haven’t chimed in much on this subject. 😉
I sometimes think we, on CAF are speaking different languages, or different versions of English, perhaps. I am going to confess that I have only seen or heard Beck a few times. I will say he is excessively oratorical in his presentation.

But I have not, at least personally, seen the man express what I would call “cruel judgments”. Polarizing, yes. But there’s plenty of that going on right now I do not exclude myself from that judgment.

You believe he has caused many a “conservative” to “stray” from helping the poor. In what way has he done that? Who has given less because of him? When has he ever told us to snap our own pocketbooks shut against the needy? By arguing against the growth of government control of our lives? By arguing against taking money from our neighbor instead of ourselves, to give it to whatever causes strike us as socially just? It seems to me excessive government encorachment into human life is what his message is. Every Pope since and including Leo XIII has said the very same thing. I agree that calling out “socialism” or “communism” is often excessive; in here as it is on radio. But doing that sort of thing is hardly peculiar to Beck.

One of the posters compared being Republican to being ungodly, as if to be a Republican is inherently unchristian or unCatholic. What pope has said that? Where is that in the Catechism? Are people really reacting to what Republicans have in their hearts, or are they reacting to what they think is in Republican hearts? By “social justice”, I am truly asking, what do those who condemn Beck mean in practical terms?

I was raised Democrat. I held office in the party. So did my wife. At a point, the party ran off and left us when it became dedicated to abortion. But it wasn’t just that, and I apply this to Republicans and Democrats and “social justice” promoters equally. I am appalled that nobody, absolutely nobody, including people in this forum, raises his/her voice for the neediest of all in this country; the disabled needy who don’t have 40 quarters of withheld income, who are somehow expected to subsist on about $600/month; sometimes less. Who is their champion? I don’t see one. No Democrat. No Republican. No priest or preacher or organization that promotes “social justice” that I have ever heard. Yet those are precisely the people the popes have told us most clearly should be the very first who should be the recipients of our largesse; perhaps of our substance. Where are the “social justice” people with that?

Are we talking moral principles here or political ideologies? Does anybody know what Beck thinks about the people on SSI? Maybe I should write to him and find out. His address must be somewhere accessible. And what if he says “yes,that would be my first priority”? Would anyone change his mind about Beck, or would they condemn him still because he opposes government health insurance subsidies for the middle class and uses oratorical techniques to deliver the message of that opposition?

Who is the champion for those elderly who have to go totally broke to get nursing care? (Their spouses too, or nearly so) Certainly not this congress or this president or the Republicans or any “social justice” organization information I have ever seen. I talked to a lady today who has MS, yet is trying to take care of her husband who is in the advanced stages of Alzheimer’s. Is there “social justice” for her, perhaps? If so, the proponents are not out there on any horizon I can see. And yet her need is so much more severe than that of someone earning $60,000 who wants somebody making $90,000 to help him pay for his health insurance. But no champion for the lady with MS.

I’ll admit, I get furious with those dioceses, and catholic organizations who do all this promoting of “social justice” in a political way, and yet do they build nursing homes and make efforts to staff them with people (and I know they exist) who would work for much less in order to ensure decent care for the old, the sick and the afllicted without first requiring that they impoverish themselves and their spouses? No sir, they do not.

I read not long ago of a nun, very big in a supposedly Catholic organization active in promoting Obama. Very big on “social justice”. She controls funds amounting to over a billion dollars. Her mission, as she sees it (outside of elections) and, indeed, exercises it, is to spend money suing government agencies and corporations to make them do this or that, or to refrain from this or from that. Force, force, force. No funding of nursing homes, though.

Is this social justice, then? We ignore the truly needy; the desperately ill and the desperately poor, yet we sue the government to force them to spend money taken by force from taxpayers, in ways we think are socially just?

Maybe I don’t understand Beck at all. Maybe I don’t understand what people really mean when they go on and on about social justice and how terrible people are who (despite perhaps being personally generous in ways they don’t see) are wary of government domination of lives in the very same way the popes have been.

Possibly I need a translation book.
 
The whole Glenn Beck ideology is based on being 'independent" and, well, selfish. And not thought out, and not based on Matthew 25.
Oh good. Someone who can tell us how much Glen Beck gives to charity and to others. How much does he give?
 
Oh good. Someone who can tell us how much Glen Beck gives to charity and to others. How much does he give?
He’s a Mormon… he has to give 10% to his church which uses some of their income for charity… How much that is is debatable. Without giving his tithing he would be deprived of many of his privileges in the church until he has paid the debt if all the tithing that added up. (Not getting a temple permit and therefore not being able to go into the temple and attend relative’s weddings while all other “worthy” Mormons can and a couple of other things that come with not being able to get a temple permit.)
 
Glenn Beck did a show where he talks about his feelings about charity:

youtube.com/watch?v=mMw42CGCYcw

To be fair, it’s more about him railing at the Obama administration’s excessive taxation of charitable giving, but you do get to see a little bit of his philosophy when it comes to giving.

For those who don’t feel like watching the link, the gist is that it’s not that he’s against helping the poor, it’s that he’s against the government, which he believes is a bureaucratic nightmare, excessively controlling how we help the poor.

I think this is acceptable in terms of Church teaching. Both unfettered capitalism and complete command economies are both condemned by the Church, but Glenn appears to be making an argument in the middle ground that the Church is okay with.
 
He’s a Mormon… he has to give 10% to his church which uses some of their income for charity… How much that is is debatable. Without giving his tithing he would be deprived of many of his privileges in the church until he has paid the debt if all the tithing that added up. (Not getting a temple permit and therefore not being able to go into the temple and attend relative’s weddings while all other “worthy” Mormons can and a couple of other things that come with not being able to get a temple permit.)
There is a lot to critique in the Mormon church, and a lot to disapprove. But one has to admit they have a very effective social service (to members, of course) network. And they don’t use government money for it, either. They don’t accept tax-exempt status either; something the Catholic Church organizations sometimes would be better off without. The old saying “He who takes the king’s shilling is the king’s man” is really beginning to tell; e.g. the problems the Church in DC is having because of the legalization of “gay marriage” there.
 
No I do not find it presumptuous. I assume that since the topic is churches and social justice that our standard of reference would be the gospel.

Yes, we will each be asked to answer for what we did or did not do, that is exactly my point. The argument about who should or should not be doing what Christ asked is not pertinent. All that matters is that we do His will.
It presumes the person to whom it is addressed has not read the gospel because he disagrees with you, and appeals to that fallacy in an attempt to claim a moral high ground to which one is not entitled on that basis.
 
There is a lot to critique in the Mormon church, and a lot to disapprove. But one has to admit they have a very effective social service (to members, of course) network. And they don’t use government money for it, either. They don’t accept tax-exempt status either; something the Catholic Church organizations sometimes would be better off without. The old saying “He who takes the king’s shilling is the king’s man” is really beginning to tell; e.g. the problems the Church in DC is having because of the legalization of “gay marriage” there.
True. There is a German saying that could be translated as “Whose bread I eat, his song I sing.”
I think that a tax-exempt status is not a good thing for any church. There are things that a tax-exempt status brings with itself. This “favor” to the churches comes with shackles attached to it. Lyndon B Johnson who started this policy in the 50s had in mind to silence churches who were having an influence on his public policy and so far it has worked very well… A church cannot be political or risk loosing the tax-exempt status and they thereby cannot address the political problems of the day. Looking back in history, how much did the Catholic Church change by just being able to preach against Hitler or read the encyclical in public that was very much political?
Churches are not under the jurisdiction of the taxing authorities to begin with, if you follow the first amendment. (“Congress shall make NO LAW respecting an establishment of religion, nor prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”)
It can’t be free if you have to pay taxes to exercise your freedom and why would any church then go ahead and ask for an exemption?
If you read this you’ll see that churches are already exempt and among the mandatory exemptions…
 
And you are worried about Glenn Beck being to the right. I can guess you are to the left with your link to the Huffington Post, which is far left.

Social justice is not the responsibility of the governement. It is our responsibility. We are called to spread the gospel of Christ. There is no Christ with government social justice. All this government social justice might make people feel good, but in the long run, it is not helping people get to heaven, which should be our ultimate goal. Christian charity comes from an act of the will along with the message of Christ. There is no act of our individual will with government charity(we are required to pay taxes, it is not voluntary) along with no saving message of Christ, which people desparately need these days.
Then why is this man telling people to leave their CHURCH is their church uses “code words” like social justice?
 
Who cares what this gas-bag says? He’s only doing it to get people to listen to him and buy his books and watch him on TV. The Catholic Church has a 2000 year old tradition of helping those in need, which is based on the teachings of Jesus Christ. Nothing that this “nut job of the moment” says is going to change that at all.
 
Many Christian leaders are commenting about Glenn Beck diatribe. Here is one:
huffingtonpost.com/jim-wallis/another-invitation-to-gle_b_497278.html

I feel that some here have hijacked the original post. He said to run away from a CHURCH who preaches social justice. He did not say GOVERNMENT. These are two distinctly different ideas.
In posting this thread I asked if he was trying to drive Catholics away? My original question still stands.
In my humble opinion, I think he’s just tryig to get ratings. He doesn’t care what he has to say or do to get them.
Aren’t we just a little smarter than this?
 
Who cares what this gas-bag says? He’s only doing it to get people to listen to him and buy his books and watch him on TV. The Catholic Church has a 2000 year old tradition of helping those in need, which is based on the teachings of Jesus Christ. Nothing that this “nut job of the moment” says is going to change that at all.
Look through the thread. People are making excuses for him
 
Who cares what this gas-bag says? He’s only doing it to get people to listen to him and buy his books and watch him on TV. The Catholic Church has a 2000 year old tradition of helping those in need, which is based on the teachings of Jesus Christ. Nothing that this “nut job of the moment” says is going to change that at all.
Yes, because he is a showman Glenn Beck has ratings he needs to keep up. But I ask you, really and truly, to research just what some of these “social justice” webpages are promoting. It is not the 2,000 year old tradition of the Church; indeed, much of it is contrary to the Deposit of Faith as defended by Councils and Popes throughout the ages. Please show me in the teachings of Jesus Christ where it says that poverty, war, or pollution of the earth is an evil equal to abortion. Please explain to me why these groups are promoting abortion and same-sex marriage (another form of contraception) in the interests of “sustainability” of the planet. Why are they more interested in gaining political clout (through the poor) than they are with the spiritual needs of God’s poor and vulnerable? Why are they turning to an “eco-spirituality” and polluting the sacred with the profane? In the retreat I mentioned in an earlier post, we were praising creation rather than the Creator. Seems to me we are on very dangerous ground here and making our very own version of Church.
 
and another steps in:

thinkprogress.org/

It might be helpful to read down a few stories. The Catholic church responds.
I briefly looked at this and Sojourners name popped out at me. The problem, you see, is that most of these SJ groups are dissenting Catholics who rail against papal authority. You may want to look at some of the articles here and the bibliographies which will lead you further:

catholicmediacoalition.org/faith_public_life3.htm

For instance, do research on JustFaith and it’s founder, Jack Jezreel. They mean to bring down the hierarchical church which is why they promote women’s ordination. JustFaith (which networks with other political groups) has both a Protestant and Catholic program. It is ecumenical in nature (if you are Catholic perhaps a warning bell is going off right about now.) I don’t like Beck’s style, but the deception being played out in Christian churches in the name of social justice is becoming laughable. It’s all POLITICS!
 
and another steps in:

thinkprogress.org/

It might be helpful to read down a few stories. The Catholic church responds.
Let’s examine the website you have linked (since it is a little less well known than the Huffington Post, which you cited earlier).

First, it gives and then decries the opinion of Bill Donohue of the Catholic League, and also attempts to smear him with a sideswipe along the way:
However, today, conservative Catholic League President William Donohue released a statement that did indeed defend and make excuses for Beck’s comments:
Many are hammering Beck for saying, “Am I advising people to leave their church? Yes!” A closer read of what he said shows he followed that quip with, “If I am going to Jeremiah Wright’s church. If you have a priest that is pushing social justice, go find another parish.”
Beck didn’t say Christians should abandon their religion. He recommended shopping around to find a more conservative parish if one is dissatisfied with hearing left-wing sermons. Nothing new about that. In the Catholic Church, there are priests who are stridently left-wing and stridently right-wing; many parishioners shop accordingly. Protestants shop by leaving one denomination for another. And so on.
Some of those who have criticized Beck have done so in a sincere way. Others are just phonies.
But what Donohue (who has said that “Hollywood is controlled by secular Jews who hate Christianity in general and Catholicism in particular. … Hollywood likes anal sex“) leaves out is that Beck also said that Christians should run from any church that mentions “social justice” or “economic justice” on its website.
Second, Beck said that if you drill down on a church’s website that contains the code words “social justice” you will more than likely be two clicks away from arriving at a linked site that advocates progressive or liberal causes in some way. Let’s test his theory using the site you provided.

The site you have pointed to here, in criticizing Beck makes his point. The lead banner on the site says “Social Justice”. Scanning down the site as you suggest, reveals that it:

opposes the conservative reform of text books,
supports government takeover of health care,
supports legalization of illegal immigrants,
opposes the health insurance industry,
opposes the Bush administration’s use of interrogation,
supports lesbian girls who attempted to attend their high school prom,
supports the Palestinian perspective on the middle east,
supports Holder’s hiring of attorney who defended terrorists pro bono,
targets and derides Fox News

Some of the linked sites from this location are:
AFL-CIO NOW
Air America
AMERICAblog
Daily Kos
Feministe
Feministing
Huffington Post
Hullabaloo
Left Foot Forward
Media Matters
Open Left
Salon’s War Room
Science Progress
Seeing the Forest
SEIU
Sunlight Foundation
Swampland
Ta-Nehisi Coates
Talk Left
Talking Points Memo
The Conscience of a Liberal
War Room

So within a couple clicks, we have gone from “Social Justice” to support of abortion, homosexual marriage, and a shopping list of left causes. In supporting abortion, for example, some of these sites have organized for radical action against Forty Days for Life by enlisting escorts to take women to abortion clinics and are vocally anti-Catholic. In what way can these be tagged as consistently Catholic causes, while Beck is being characterized by you as “anti-Catholic”?

Beck’s point is made by you, and the problem he is pointing out is that in the context of a sermon, few people may really understand that this is the meaning of “social justice” and if they do not personally adhere to these causes, they need to change the venue of their worship.
 
Mr. Beck is an entertainer. Having read parts of Arguing With Idiots, and still wondering why Glenn posed in a fake military uniform, I can’t take him seriously.

God bless,
Ed
From what I understand, Glenn was posing as the “Book Czar.” Many of President Obama’s “Czars” were in the news at the time of the book release and it was his way of spoofing them.
 
Believe it or not, Glenn Beck was raised Catholic. He said in an interview on CBS that when he met his wife to be, who was “a hot woman and a Mormon” he converted to Mormonism in order to marry her.

That sounds like he didn’t know his faith, and still doesn’t know anything about the Catholic faith OR the Mormon faith. It had nothing to do with faith, it had to do with being attracted to this beautiful woman.

He also said he had been an alcoholic, which may explain why he is so brain damaged that he appears to be psychotic most of the time. Describing him as psychotic is too generous. The man is a sociopath with no conscience and no moral grounding.

He also admitted that he makes a ton of money doing his show and doesn’t care that people take his nonsense seriously. He openly laughed at his viewers/followers.
That pretty much sums it up. 😉
 
Let’s examine the website you have linked (since it is a little less well known than the Huffington Post, which you cited earlier).

First, it gives and then decries the opinion of Bill Donohue of the Catholic League, and also attempts to smear him with a sideswipe along the way:

Second, Beck said that if you drill down on a church’s website that contains the code words “social justice” you will more than likely be two clicks away from arriving at a linked site that advocates progressive or liberal causes in some way. Let’s test his theory using the site you provided.

The site you have pointed to here, in criticizing Beck makes his point. The lead banner on the site says “Social Justice”. Scanning down the site as you suggest, reveals that it:

opposes the conservative reform of text books,
supports government takeover of health care,
supports legalization of illegal immigrants,
opposes the health insurance industry,
opposes the Bush administration’s use of interrogation,
supports lesbian girls who attempted to attend their high school prom,
supports the Palestinian perspective on the middle east,
supports Holder’s hiring of attorney who defended terrorists pro bono,
targets and derides Fox News

Some of the linked sites from this location are:
AFL-CIO NOW
Air America
AMERICAblog
Daily Kos
Feministe
Feministing
Huffington Post
Hullabaloo
Left Foot Forward
Media Matters
Open Left
Salon’s War Room
Science Progress
Seeing the Forest
SEIU
Sunlight Foundation
Swampland
Ta-Nehisi Coates
Talk Left
Talking Points Memo
The Conscience of a Liberal
War Room

So within a couple clicks, we have gone from “Social Justice” to support of abortion, homosexual marriage, and a shopping list of left causes. In supporting abortion, for example, some of these sites have organized for radical action against Forty Days for Life by enlisting escorts to take women to abortion clinics and are vocally anti-Catholic. In what way can these be tagged as consistently Catholic causes, while Beck is being characterized by you as “anti-Catholic”?

Beck’s point is made by you, and the problem he is pointing out is that in the context of a sermon, few people may really understand that this is the meaning of “social justice” and if they do not personally adhere to these causes, they need to change the venue of their worship.
Perhaps you are not familiar with the teaching of the Catholic Church, which emphasizes social and economic justice: Please refer to a search of the US Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Web site that has more than 10 pages of links to social justice topics; also a link to the Vatican Justice/Peace site is provided. If you believe the Magisterium of the Catholic Church rather than the spin-mill called Fox “news,” you would know this. usccb.org:8765/query.html?charset=iso-8859-1&qt=social+justice&st=1 vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/justpeace/documents/rc_pc_justpeace_doc_20060526_compendio-dott-soc_en.html
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top