L
Latin
Guest
CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: MOLNISMDamnation of each person is due to a personal free choice of the person
“Molinism, stand in direct opposition to the principles of Thomism."
“If the will gives its consent, the grace which in itself is sufficient becomes efficacious; if it withholds its consent, the grace remains inefficacious."
"If the decision ultimately depends on the free will, whether a given grace shall be efficacious or not, the result of the salutary act must be attributed to man and not to God.”
“But this is contrary to the warning of St. Paul, that we must not glory in the work of our salvation as though it were our own (1 Corinthians 4:7), and to his teaching that it is Divine grace which does not only give us the power to act, but works also in us to will and to accomplish; (Philippians 2:13); it is contrary also to the constant doctrine of St. Augustine, according to whom our free salutary acts are not our own work, but the work of grace.”
“Molinists, by their undue exaltation of man’s freedom of will, seriously circumscribe and diminish the supremacy of the Creator over His creatures, so that they destroy the efficacy and predominance of grace and make impossible in the hands of God the infallible result of efficacious grace.”
“The consideration of these serious difficulties leads us to the very heart of Molina’s system, and reveals the real Gordian knot of the whole controversy.”
.
“Thomism derives the infallible success of efficacious grace from the very nature of this grace, and assumes consequently the grace to be efficacious intrinsically (gratia efficax ab intrinseco).”
“Thomism assumes an intrinsic and essential difference between sufficient and efficacious grace, so that sufficient grace to become efficacious must be supplemented by a new grace.”
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10437a.htm
.
THE MYSTERY OF PREDESTINATION John Salza .
“Sufficient grace gives man the potency to do good, but efficacious grace is required to move him from potency to act.
Therefore, sufficient grace is insufficient to move him to act, the power remains in potency and is never actualized.
When God wills a person to perform a salutary act (e.g., prayer, good works), He grants him the means (an efficacious grace ) that infallibly produces the end ( the act willed by God ).
.
If God wills to permit a person to resist His grace, He grants him a sufficient, and not an efficacious, grace.
The distinctions between these graces reveal that God is responsible for man’s salvation.”
.
As we see above, your above statement Vico, according to the principles of Molinism, absolutely correct. – In Molinism man is responsible for his damnation, his blood is in his own hands.
As we see above, your above statement Vico, according to the principles of Thomism, absolutely incorrect. – In Thomism God is responsible for man’s damnation, the blood of the damned is in God’s hands.
.
God bless
Last edited: