C
Well actually as Ceasar indicated above, the complete vernacular missal was a modern innovation under Pius IX. In mediaevel times, there were parts of the Ordinary of the Mass printed in books but not a complete missal by any means.Really? Even with a Missal in their hands? Was the entire church struck by a plague of blindness for so many centuries?
lol - will they teach me how to speak the language?There’s an SSPX monastery on the coast of Scotland. Go there; they’ll straighten you out!
Am I reading your post correctly? You do not believe celibacy should be required of priests?To this I would agree. I have a similiar feeling about mandatory clerical celibacy, which I am for removing but I do not think the circumstances now would warrent it (modernists would smell blood).
Not blindness, illiteracy, as I’ve discussed in another thread.Really? Even with a Missal in their hands? Was the entire church struck by a plague of blindness for so many centuries?
This is a very relevant point. And at one time, ordinary people were discouraged form owning a Bible and reading it.Not blindness, illiteracy, as I’ve discussed in another thread.
How many people could even read, prior to say 1850, to be able to USE a Missal? Less than one-third at the very best - and the majority of those were probably only ‘literate’ to the extent that they could sign their own name to documents, nothing more.
Certainly Missals helped this vast majority of people not a bit.
I’ve heard and seen a lot of otherwise in the Latin church, and the phrase I picked is exactly an example of that: during the Western captivity it made it into the Orthodox service books (to combat Protestant ideas).In his own person, the priest has no power to consecrate the Eucharist or to forgive sins. All such power is in the person of Christ. This has always been the teaching of the Church.
If they’re not fully literate, this would seem to be a reasonable and prudent recommendation.This is a very relevant point. And at one time, ordinary people were discouraged form owning a Bible and reading it.
So it isn’t fine for me to attend a Traditional Latin Mass? That seems to be what you’re saying. You’re telling me that the Mass has no value for me. That’s incredibly arrogant.Even with a missal in their hands. I have tried to lern other langauges and I have never been good at them. If I don’t understand them spoken, I am hardly gonna understand them written! I would never join a religion that I don’t understand. Many people who are in RCIA would not have done RCIA if they didn’;t understand the language used. I’m sure if you can speak Latin, it is fine but if you don’t then it isn’t. Why Latin anyway? Why not double Dutch? It would mean the same!
No. They’ll teach you to respect it.lol - will they teach me how to speak the language?
Who does? Who can?When Christ asked for the children to come to Him I don’t think he expected them to understand every nuance of what He preached.
I truly believe that He loves those who follow without fully understanding.
I have too, I don’t fully understand.
And what of the arrogance of your posts to our new convert?So it isn’t fine for me to attend a Traditional Latin Mass? That seems to be what you’re saying. You’re telling me that the Mass has no value for me. That’s incredibly arrogant.
Latin is the official ecclesial language and has been ordained by the Holy Spirit as such. Its value has already been discussed at length in this thread. Read over the previous posts.
I’m sure people developed an understanding even without Missals - especially since they were raised with this Mass. It really isn’t that complex.Not blindness, illiteracy, as I’ve discussed in another thread.
How many people could even read, prior to say 1850, to be able to USE a Missal? Less than one-third at the very best - and the majority of those were probably only ‘literate’ to the extent that they could sign their own name to documents, nothing more.
Certainly Missals helped this vast majority of people not a bit.
Would you drop that, already?And what of the arrogance of your posts to our new convert?
Exactly!Can we please pull ourselves away from that old cliche that says you can’t understand the Mass when you are unable to completely understand the language it is spoken in? I’m willing to bet that more people understood the Latin Mass when they hardly spoke a word of Latin then understand the Novus Ordo in their own language. Recall Bishop Trautman’s desire for a more simplistic english translation of the Novus Ordo on the basis that Catholics today are too dumb to understand the forthcoming translations?
The issue of understanding goes far beyond language. You can have all the vernacular Masses you want, but they mean nothing without proper doctrinal and liturgical formation. Furthermore, language has no bearing on the spirituality of the Mass.
Let’s remember, too, that nobody’s forcing you to attend the Extraordinary Form. You, and any potential converts, are perfectly entitled to attend the Ordinary Form if you are so averse to the Church’s most ancient traditions.Even with a missal in their hands. I have tried to lern other langauges and I have never been good at them. If I don’t understand them spoken, I am hardly gonna understand them written! I would never join a religion that I don’t understand. Many people who are in RCIA would not have done RCIA if they didn’;t understand the language used. I’m sure if you can speak Latin, it is fine but if you don’t then it isn’t. Why Latin anyway? Why not double Dutch? It would mean the same!
We don’t. The priest is in persona episcopi, the bishop is the ordinary minister of the Holy Mysteries. The episcopate is the means by which the one priesthood of Christ is administered.
I think the confusion here is in that the Orthodox do not follow the teaching of a priest being in Persona Christi. I could be wrong --but I think I came across this over at the Eastern forum.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LilyM
Not blindness, illiteracy, as I’ve discussed in another thread.
How many people could even read, prior to say 1850, to be able to USE a Missal? Less than one-third at the very best - and the majority of those were probably only ‘literate’ to the extent that they could sign their own name to documents, nothing more.
Certainly Missals helped this vast majority of people not a bit.
This is a very relevant point. And at one time, ordinary people were discouraged form owning a Bible and reading it.
That’s fine but some people would like all Masses to be in Latin. I am not really averse to Latin - just being awkward but I do think that some people forget that many people are not conversant in Latin meaning that they are unlikely to have any understanding of it. But then again, the Holy Spirit might descend upon them and give them the gift of interpretting tongues. Doctors and botanists should be OK since Latin should be familiar due to all the plant names and ilness names.Let’s remember, too, that nobody’s forcing you to attend the Extraordinary Form. You, and any potential converts, are perfectly entitled to attend the Ordinary Form if you are so averse to the Church’s most ancient traditions.