Golden Number linked to 666

  • Thread starter Thread starter tito_zoulou
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

tito_zoulou

Guest
Golden Number linked to 666

While working on my websites on 666 Myth ( 666myth.co.nr/ French = 666mythe.co.nr/ ), on Pope Benedict 16 **- Mark 666 **( chez.com/cosmos2000/Forums/NEWS_MemoryPopeJohnPaul_II.html ) and on Isomorphous Triplets ( chez.com/cosmos2000/Numbers/IsomorphousTriplets.html ), I have found recently direct links between the Beast Number 666 and the famous Golden Number Phi, well-known by Pythagoras, Leonardo da Vinci, Vitruvian Man … and in Sacred Geometry, in architecture and many natural phenomenons. This unexpected and incredible relation 666 versus Phi may constitute a way for the Rehabilitation of 666 !!! …

First we have this curious relations:

666 = 7^3 pi (Phi – 1) = 7^3 pi phi or **666 = (6/5) ****7^3 Phi
with pi = 3.141593 Phi = 1.618034 phi = Phi -1 = 0.618034 and 7^**3 = cubic of 7

Besides, after computing some sinus and cosines [a good online Trigonometry calculator available at 1728.com/trigcalc.htm ], expressed in Degrees and absolute values, we obtain:

Phi /2 = sin 666º** = cos 324º = cos 216º = cos 144º = cos 36º = 0.80901699…**
Phi = 2sin 666º** = 2cos 324º = 2cos 216º = 2cos 144º = 2cos 36º = 1,61803399…**
Phi = sin 666º + cos 216º
Phi = cos 144º + cos 36º
Phi = sin 666º + cos 144º

Needed: Formal mathematical proofs for this 666 and Golden Number** **links.
 
Question,

For those of us who do not teach advanced calculus at Havard could you please explain what all this is? The general point would also be a wonderful add on.

-D
 
What is the point of this post…wow…big deal, you can point to 666 with mathematical equations…so…I can prove 2=5 with enough time and the right mathematical proof…what does this have to do with us, Pope Benedict XVI or George Bush, or whoever people believe is the anti-christ?
 
chez.com/cosmos2000/Numbers/666Pope.html

That is a link to the OP’s site…it is so, so sickening. This person is extremely anti-catholic and believes JPII and B-16 are the anti-christ…They are truly a troubled individual and really, really need our prayers…please pray for this individual…this is so sad.
 
What’s the point of vomiting out all this if you don’t take the time to explain it so that people can understand it?
 
Hello dumspirospero,

PLEASE take note that I am FULL catholic and really pay honor to our former Pope John Paul II or better John Paul Le Grand.

Actually, the page you just visited is in honor and good memory of Pope John Paul II .

During your visit on the page may be you even don’t read carefully

« Preface and Warning: Rehabilitation of 666 »

Please go back to chez.com/cosmos2000/Forums/NEWS_MemoryPopeJohnPaul_II.html
and read carefully this Warning.

Besides, « Revelation! 666 is not the number of the beast (it’s a devilish 616)»

More information at:

news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_britain/story.jsp?story=634679
By Tom Anderson , 01 May 2005
http://www.thesupernaturalworld.co.uk/index.php?act=main&code=01&type=00&topic_id=4664

Revelation! 666 is not the number of the beast!
Posted by phenomenon on Wed, 4 May 2005 16:44:00 +0100

Moreover, for people who still get so fear of number 666, there are simple antidotes at these links:
666 Myth : 666myth.co.nr/
French = 666 Myth : 666mythe.co.nr/

Have a nice day and please take it easy.
 
The collection of numerologies on John paul II is quite impressive. I’m quite interested in the whole department of mathematics and gematria for proof of the signature of God in the Bible and otherwise as we see with Mary and John Paul II.

I’m not keen on relating Ratzinger to the beast, but you say 666 is not the number of the beast (although Revelation says it is his name) and then again, many people matched the 666 number, including Hitler I think, but they were boviously not the beast.

I do not know any math as advanced as this. Could you possibly try to explain to me the relationship of 666 to Phi?

And the news that the number is actually 616 is quite surprising! Unfortunately I don’t subscribe to the independant… could you please post some information about this? Was the originally believed 666 translation a copyist error? Perhaps the old scrol is the error which is why its discarded…

And if it is really 616, don’t all the relationships to 666 become irrelevant?
 
40.png
jdnation:
The collection of numerologies on John paul II is quite impressive. I’m quite interested in the whole department of mathematics and gematria for proof of the signature of God in the Bible and otherwise as we see with Mary and John Paul II.

I’m not keen on relating Ratzinger to the beast, but you say 666 is not the number of the beast (although Revelation says it is his name) and then again, many people matched the 666 number, including Hitler I think, but they were boviously not the beast.

I do not know any math as advanced as this. Could you possibly try to explain to me the relationship of 666 to Phi?

And the news that the number is actually 616 is quite surprising! Unfortunately I don’t subscribe to the independant… could you please post some information about this? Was the originally believed 666 translation a copyist error? Perhaps the old scrol is the error which is why its discarded…

And if it is really 616, don’t all the relationships to 666 become irrelevant?
Click to expand...
I would ignore anything the Independent has to say about anything to do with the Christian faith. It’s an uber-liberal paper I wouldn’t advise any Catholic to read. Unless you want an upset stomach.
 
Hi jdnation,

Thanks for comments.

But, at this stage, I can’t help you more because I need myself to collect and study some information.

Any way, one thing is sure: 666 is deeply linked at the structure of many other numbers.

**Actually, I am trying to build some general theory for Isomorphous Triplets in form 111, 222, 333, … , 999
So the first set of equations, i.e. 666 = 7^3 pi (Phi – 1) = 7^3 pi phi or 666 = (6/5) 7^3 Phi , with pi = 3.141593 Phi = 1.618034 phi = Phi -1 = 0.618034 and 7^3 = cubic of 7, is just part of my general theory.

I have already obtained these two sets of results:

I) Golden Ratio Phi , Pi and Isomorphous Triplets Links
**
**111 = (1/5)7^3 Phi = (1/6)7^3pi phi ****
222 = (2/5)7^3 Phi = (2/6)7^3pi phi
333 = (3/5)7^3 Phi = (3/6)7^3pi phi
444 = (4/5)7^3 Phi = (4/6)7^3pi phi
555 = (5/5)7^3 Phi = (5/6)7^3pi phi
**666 = (6/5)7^3 Phi = (6/6)7^3pi phi **
777 = (7/5)7^3 Phi = (7/6)7^3pi phi
888 = (8/5)7^3 Phi = (8/6)7^3pi phi
999 = (9/5)7^3 Phi = (9/6)7^3pi phi

**NOTES : **
**7^3 = 343 ----- > 3 4 + 3 ----- > 37 **
**Phi = 1.618034 7^3Phi = 554.985662 = 555 **
**phi = Phi -1 = 0.618034 7^3 pi phi = 665.972672 = 666 **
**Circle = 360º = 2 pi radians ----- > 1º = 2 pi/360 radians **
**or 1º = pi/180 radians then: 30º = pi/6 **

**II) Basic Structure of Isomorphous Triplets **

**3 x 37 = 37 x 3 x 1 = 111 ----- > 1+ 1 +1 = 3 **
6 x 37 = 37 x 3 x 2 = 222 ----- > 2+ 2 +2 = 6
9 x 37 = 37 x 3 x 3 = 333 ----- > 3+ 3+ 3 = 9
12 x 37 = 37 x 3 x 4 = 444 ----- > 4+4+4 = 12
**15 x 37 = 37 x 3 x 5 = 555 ----- > 5+5+5 = 15 **
**18 x 37 = 37 x 3 x 6 = 666 ----- > 6+6+6 = 18 **
21 x 37 = 37 x 3 x 7 = 777 ----- > 7+7+7 = 21
24 x 37 = 37 x 3 x 8 = 888 ----- > 8+8+8 = 24
27 x 37 = 37x 3 x 9 = 999 ----- > 9+9+9 = 27

For more information** Isomorphous Triplets**
chez.com/cosmos2000/Numbers/IsomorphousTriplets.html
666 Myth** ( 666myth.co.nr/ French = 666mythe.co.nr/ )**Have a nice day

**
 
Ok…I am not Dr. Stephen Hawkins…could you please translate what you just typed?

tito_zoulou said:
Hi jdnation,

Thanks for comments.

But, at this stage, I can’t help you more because I need myself to collect and study some information.

Any way, one thing is sure: 666 is deeply linked at the structure of many other numbers.

**Actually, I am trying to build some general theory for Isomorphous Triplets in form 111, 222, 333, … , 999 **
**So the first set of equations, i.e. 666 = 7^3 pi (Phi – 1) = 7^3 pi phi or 666 = (6/5) 7^3 Phi , with pi = 3.141593 Phi = 1.618034 phi = Phi -1 = 0.618034 and 7^3 = cubic of 7, is just part of my general theory. **

**I have already obtained these two sets of results: **

I) Golden Ratio Phi , Pi and Isomorphous Triplets Links

**111 = (1/5)7^3 Phi = (1/6)7^3pi phi **
222 = (2/5)7^3 Phi = (2/6)7^3pi phi
333 = (3/5)7^3 Phi = (3/6)7^3pi phi
444 = (4/5)7^3 Phi = (4/6)7^3pi phi
555 = (5/5)7^3 Phi = (5/6)7^3pi phi
**666 = (6/5)7^3 Phi = (6/6)7^3pi phi **
777 = (7/5)7^3 Phi = (7/6)7^3pi phi
888 = (8/5)7^3 Phi = (8/6)7^3pi phi
999 = (9/5)7^3 Phi = (9/6)7^3pi phi

**NOTES : **
**7^3 = 343 ----- > 3 4 + 3 ----- > 37 **
**Phi = 1.618034 7^3Phi = 554.985662 = 555 **
**phi = Phi -1 = 0.618034 7^3 pi phi = 665.972672 = 666 **
**Circle = 360º = 2 pi radians ----- > 1º = 2 pi/360 radians **
**or 1º = pi/180 radians then: 30º = pi/6 **

**II) Basic Structure of Isomorphous Triplets **

**3 x 37 = 37 x 3 x 1 = 111 ----- > 1+ 1 +1 = 3 **
6 x 37 = 37 x 3 x 2 = 222 ----- > 2+ 2 +2 = 6
9 x 37 = 37 x 3 x 3 = 333 ----- > 3+ 3+ 3 = 9
12 x 37 = 37 x 3 x 4 = 444 ----- > 4+4+4 = 12
**15 x 37 = 37 x 3 x 5 = 555 ----- > 5+5+5 = 15 **
**18 x 37 = 37 x 3 x 6 = 666 ----- > 6+6+6 = 18 **
21 x 37 = 37 x 3 x 7 = 777 ----- > 7+7+7 = 21
24 x 37 = 37 x 3 x 8 = 888 ----- > 8+8+8 = 24
27 x 37 = 37x 3 x 9 = 999 ----- > 9+9+9 = 27

For more information Isomorphous Triplets****
chez.com/cosmos2000/Numbers/IsomorphousTriplets.html
666 Myth ( 666myth.co.nr/ French = 666mythe.co.nr/ )Have a nice day
Click to expand...
 
Hey watch it with the number 999! This is my street address, part of my OHIP # and social security #! :eek: 😛

Blessings,
Shoshana
 
tito_zoulou said:
666 = 7^3 pi (Phi – 1)
Click to expand...

7^3pi(Phi-1) is transcendental, so it cannot be an integer. Its approximate value is 665.9725862828.
 
No need to rehabilitate 666. Some background information:
Revelation was written in code during one of the Roman persecutions, almost certainly that by the emperor Domitian, who reigned from 81-96 A.D… There are a handful of oddballs who think Revelation was written during the earlier persecution by Nero shortly before 70 A.D., but this seems unlikely. First, it is believed that John wasn’t exiled to Patmos until much later than 70. Second, Nero’s persecution was fairly local to the city of Rome, though it did spill into southern Italy. There would be no reason why John would send an urgent message to the seven churches mentioned in Revelation, as these were confined to a small area of what today is western Turkey, an area that was not really touched by the persecution. Therefore, most scholars conclude that it was written during the reign of Domitian.

Now much of Revelation was written in code so that if the Romans got wind of it they wouldn’t know what to make of it. Which brings us to 666. This was a direct reference to Nero Caesar, the first emperor to persecute Christians, and an indirect reference therefore to his successor Domitian. To understand this, the letters of the Hebrew alphabet had numerical values assigned to them in much the same way that Roman numerals are formed by assigning values to letters of the Roman alphabet. If you add up the letters of the Hebrew spelling of Nero Caesar, you get 666. Now, in certain areas of the empire there was an alternate spelling which added up to 616. There were no printing presses in those days (BTW, an excellent argument against Sola Scriptura), so it was disseminated by rescript. In those areas where the alternate spelling was fashionable they made the substitution, and some manuscripts have been found with 616. There is nothing inherently evil about either number. They’re just references to Nero, a gravely deranged man.

Now to more serious matters. You can’t prove that sin(666) = -(sqrt(5) + 1)/4 ? Come on, where’d you get that Ph. D., DeVry?

666 = 720 - 54, so we can reduce the question to a matter of calculating the sine of 54, or the cosine of 36. Note that cos(36) = sqrt( 1 - sin(36)^2 ), so let’s work on sin(36)^2.

sin(5x) = sin(x) cos(4x) + sin(4x) cos(x)
= sin(x) (2 cos(2x) ^2 - 1) + 2 sin(2x) cos(2x) cos(x)
= sin(x) (2 ( 1 - 2 sin(x)^2 )^2 - 1) + …
4 sin(x) cos(x)^2 (1 - 2 sin(x)^2)
= sin(x) (2 (1 - 4 sin(x)^2 + 4 sin(x)^4) - 1) + …
4 sin(x) ( 1 - sin(x)^2 ) (1 - 2 sin(x)^2)
Let w = sin(x)
sin(5x) = w (1 - 8w^2 + 8w^4) + 4 w (1 - 3w^2 + 2w^4)
= w(5 - 20w^2 + 16w^4)
Now let’s solve sin(5x) = 0. This will give us the sines of 0, 36, 72, -36, and -72.
0 = w(5 - 20w^2 + 16w^4)
Since we’re not interested in the solution w = 0,
0 = (5 - 20w^2 + 16w^4)
Let z = w^2
z = (20 +/- sqrt(400 - 320)) / 32
= (5 +/- sqrt(5)) / 8
Since we’re interested in the smaller root (sin(36)^2, not sin(72)^2), we choose the minus sign.

z = w^2 = (5 - sqrt(5)) / 8
sin(54) = cos(36) = sqrt( 1 - w^2 )
= sqrt( 1 - (5 - sqrt(5)) / 8 )
= sqrt( (3 + sqrt(5))/8 )
I leave it as an exercise for the reader to show that
((sqrt(5) + 1)/4 )^2 = (3 + sqrt(5))/8

Child’s play, really.

Time for bed. It’s not worth the effort to comment on the silliness of what you’re trying to do.
 
Catholic2003 wrote:
7^3pi(Phi-1) is transcendental, so it cannot be an integer. Its approximate value is 665.9725862828.
Click to expand...
You right!

Just put the relation in form:

7^3pi(Phi-1) = 665.9725862828 ------>** 666**

Actually, the concepts of pi, Phi and 666 Myth is from Ancients; but ancients mathematicians don’t care about the notion “transcendental” while estimating pi to 22/7 or pi = 22/7
 
Catholic2003 wrote:
7^3pi(Phi-1) is transcendental, so it cannot be an integer. Its approximate value is 665.9725862828.
Click to expand...
In fact, one could just put the relation in form:

7^3pi(Phi-1) = 665.9725862828 ------>** 666**

I have already pointed that actually the concepts of pi, Phi and 666 Myth is from Ancients; but ancients mathematicians don’t care about the notion “transcendental” while estimating pi with integers to 22/7 or pi = 22/7. Another modern estimation is pi = 355/113 Ramanujan (1913-14) and Olds (1963)]

The constant pi is defined as the ratio of a circle’s circumference C to its diameter d=2r, where r is the radius :
C = 2r pi or pi = C/2r

So, pi is a real number by definition

But pi is now known to be irrational ( Borwein and Bailey 2003, pp. 139-140) and pi is also transcendental (Lindemann 1882).

Besides, Dixon (1991) linked pi to Golden number Phi:

6/5(1 + Phi) = 3.141640… = pi

See Pi from MathWorld for more information and references
mathworld.wolfram.com/Pi.html

Helpful References

Borwein, J. and Bailey, D. Mathematics by Experiment: Plausible Reasoning in the 21st Century. Natick, MA: A. K. Peters, 2003.
Dalzell, D. P. “On 22/7 and 355/113.” Eureka 34, 10-13, 1971.
Dixon, R. “The Story of Pi .” §4.3 in Mathographics.New York: Dover, pp. 44-49 and 98-101, 1991.
Lindemann, F. “Über die Zahl pi.” Math. Ann. 20, 213-225, 1882. .
Olds, C. D. .Continued Fractions New York: Random House, pp. 59-60, 1963.
Ramanujan, S. “Modular Equations and Approximations to pi.” Quart. J. Pure. Appl. Math. 45, 350-372, 1913-1914.
 
tito_zoulou said:
Hi jdnation,

Thanks for comments.

But, at this stage, I can’t help you more because I need myself to collect and study some information.

Any way, one thing is sure: 666 is deeply linked at the structure of many other numbers.

**Actually, I am trying to build some general theory for Isomorphous Triplets in form 111, 222, 333, … , 999 **
**So the first set of equations, i.e. 666 = 7^3 pi (Phi – 1) = 7^3 pi phi or 666 = (6/5) 7^3 Phi , with pi = 3.141593 Phi = 1.618034 phi = Phi -1 = 0.618034 and 7^3 = cubic of 7, is just part of my general theory. **

**I have already obtained these two sets of results: **

I) Golden Ratio Phi , Pi and Isomorphous Triplets Links

**111 = (1/5)7^3 Phi = (1/6)7^3pi phi **
222 = (2/5)7^3 Phi = (2/6)7^3pi phi
333 = (3/5)7^3 Phi = (3/6)7^3pi phi
444 = (4/5)7^3 Phi = (4/6)7^3pi phi
555 = (5/5)7^3 Phi = (5/6)7^3pi phi
**666 = (6/5)7^3 Phi = (6/6)7^3pi phi **
777 = (7/5)7^3 Phi = (7/6)7^3pi phi
888 = (8/5)7^3 Phi = (8/6)7^3pi phi
999 = (9/5)7^3 Phi = (9/6)7^3pi phi

**NOTES : **
**7^3 = 343 ----- > 3 4 + 3 ----- > 37 **
**Phi = 1.618034 7^3Phi = 554.985662 = 555 **
**phi = Phi -1 = 0.618034 7^3 pi phi = 665.972672 = 666 **
**Circle = 360º = 2 pi radians ----- > 1º = 2 pi/360 radians **
**or 1º = pi/180 radians then: 30º = pi/6 **

**II) Basic Structure of Isomorphous Triplets **

**3 x 37 = 37 x 3 x 1 = 111 ----- > 1+ 1 +1 = 3 **
6 x 37 = 37 x 3 x 2 = 222 ----- > 2+ 2 +2 = 6
9 x 37 = 37 x 3 x 3 = 333 ----- > 3+ 3+ 3 = 9
12 x 37 = 37 x 3 x 4 = 444 ----- > 4+4+4 = 12
**15 x 37 = 37 x 3 x 5 = 555 ----- > 5+5+5 = 15 **
**18 x 37 = 37 x 3 x 6 = 666 ----- > 6+6+6 = 18 **
21 x 37 = 37 x 3 x 7 = 777 ----- > 7+7+7 = 21
24 x 37 = 37 x 3 x 8 = 888 ----- > 8+8+8 = 24
27 x 37 = 37x 3 x 9 = 999 ----- > 9+9+9 = 27

For more information Isomorphous Triplets****
chez.com/cosmos2000/Numbers/IsomorphousTriplets.html
666 Myth ( 666myth.co.nr/ French = 666mythe.co.nr/ )Have a nice day
Click to expand...

Huh?
 
Huh…you two have lost the rest of us in your mathematics war…I agree with a lot of what you said, but my question for you, is if you believe what the Church teaches in regards to the Anti-Christ? Do you believe there will be a persecution in the future of all Christians, and the person in charge of this persecution, or tribulation, will be the Anti-Christ…the Son of Perdition? I do believe that there will be a tribulation and an Anti-Christ, as per the Catechism…but is it possible for the Book of Revelations to be both an account of history and prophetic at the same time?
40.png
RocketScientist:
No need to rehabilitate 666. Some background information:
Revelation was written in code during one of the Roman persecutions, almost certainly that by the emperor Domitian, who reigned from 81-96 A.D… There are a handful of oddballs who think Revelation was written during the earlier persecution by Nero shortly before 70 A.D., but this seems unlikely. First, it is believed that John wasn’t exiled to Patmos until much later than 70. Second, Nero’s persecution was fairly local to the city of Rome, though it did spill into southern Italy. There would be no reason why John would send an urgent message to the seven churches mentioned in Revelation, as these were confined to a small area of what today is western Turkey, an area that was not really touched by the persecution. Therefore, most scholars conclude that it was written during the reign of Domitian.

Now much of Revelation was written in code so that if the Romans got wind of it they wouldn’t know what to make of it. Which brings us to 666. This was a direct reference to Nero Caesar, the first emperor to persecute Christians, and an indirect reference therefore to his successor Domitian. To understand this, the letters of the Hebrew alphabet had numerical values assigned to them in much the same way that Roman numerals are formed by assigning values to letters of the Roman alphabet. If you add up the letters of the Hebrew spelling of Nero Caesar, you get 666. Now, in certain areas of the empire there was an alternate spelling which added up to 616. There were no printing presses in those days (BTW, an excellent argument against Sola Scriptura), so it was disseminated by rescript. In those areas where the alternate spelling was fashionable they made the substitution, and some manuscripts have been found with 616. There is nothing inherently evil about either number. They’re just references to Nero, a gravely deranged man.

Now to more serious matters. You can’t prove that sin(666) = -(sqrt(5) + 1)/4 ? Come on, where’d you get that Ph. D., DeVry?

666 = 720 - 54, so we can reduce the question to a matter of calculating the sine of 54, or the cosine of 36. Note that cos(36) = sqrt( 1 - sin(36)^2 ), so let’s work on sin(36)^2.

sin(5x) = sin(x) cos(4x) + sin(4x) cos(x)
= sin(x) (2 cos(2x) ^2 - 1) + 2 sin(2x) cos(2x) cos(x)
= sin(x) (2 ( 1 - 2 sin(x)^2 )^2 - 1) + …
4 sin(x) cos(x)^2 (1 - 2 sin(x)^2)
= sin(x) (2 (1 - 4 sin(x)^2 + 4 sin(x)^4) - 1) + …
4 sin(x) ( 1 - sin(x)^2 ) (1 - 2 sin(x)^2)
Let w = sin(x)
sin(5x) = w (1 - 8w^2 + 8w^4) + 4 w (1 - 3w^2 + 2w^4)
= w(5 - 20w^2 + 16w^4)
Now let’s solve sin(5x) = 0. This will give us the sines of 0, 36, 72, -36, and -72.
0 = w(5 - 20w^2 + 16w^4)
Since we’re not interested in the solution w = 0,
0 = (5 - 20w^2 + 16w^4)
Let z = w^2
z = (20 +/- sqrt(400 - 320)) / 32
= (5 +/- sqrt(5)) / 8
Since we’re interested in the smaller root (sin(36)^2, not sin(72)^2), we choose the minus sign.

z = w^2 = (5 - sqrt(5)) / 8
sin(54) = cos(36) = sqrt( 1 - w^2 )
= sqrt( 1 - (5 - sqrt(5)) / 8 )
= sqrt( (3 + sqrt(5))/8 )
I leave it as an exercise for the reader to show that
((sqrt(5) + 1)/4 )^2 = (3 + sqrt(5))/8

Child’s play, really.

Time for bed. It’s not worth the effort to comment on the silliness of what you’re trying to do.
Click to expand...
 
dumspirospero wrote:
Huh…you two have lost the rest of us in your mathematics war…I agree with a lot of what you said, but my question for you, is if you believe what the Church teaches in regards to the Anti-Christ? Do you believe there will be a persecution in the future of all Christians, and the person in charge of this persecution, or tribulation, will be the Anti-Christ…the Son of Perdition? I do believe that there will be a tribulation and an Anti-Christ, as per the Catechism…but is it possible for the Book of Revelations to be both an account of history and prophetic at the same time?
Click to expand...
I have no clear answer, because 616 or 666 are just myth …

More information at these 2 links:

news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_britain/story.jsp?story=634679
« Revelation! 666 is not the number of the beast (it’s a devilish 616)»
By Tom Anderson , 01 May 2005
http://www.thesupernaturalworld.co.uk/index.php?act=main&code=01&type=00&topic_id=4664

Revelation! 666 is not the number of the beast!
Posted by phenomenon on Wed, 4 May 2005 16:44:00 +0100​

However, some people speak about number coincidences, synchronicity and so on. But actually, in numbers pattern there is no accident. The language of numbers is pure, with sublime meaning.

May be, Mathematics, physics and science in general are just some ways to help us discover the sublime nature of the world, the cosmos and God’s power.

The number would be God’s shadow, because it is beauty, and besides, number is universal language and this contrary to all the alphabets.
God would doubtless be the biggest mathematician of every time.
**Einstein **already says that **God don’t play dice … **or yoyo ! lolllllllllll

" Everywhere where there is number, there is beauty. " (PROCLUS, 410-485 BC)
" **Everything here in the world exists only by the movement and the number: the movement is in a sense the active number **" (BALZAC)

For example, take a look at the following links between Phi, mile, kilometer and Fibonacci series:

Definition of Fibonacci numbers: **Fn = Fn-1 + Fn-2 **with **F0 = 0, F1 = 1, F2 = 1 **,
Fibonacci series:
0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89,144,233,377,610,987,1597,2584,4181,67 65,10946,17711

**1 mile ≈ Φ kilometers **with Φ = Phi = 1.618034
Fn mi = Fn+1 km ⇒ **5 mi = 8 km **or 8 mi = 13 km

References:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top