contemplative:
Thus far you knock those Catholics who homeschool their children and Opus Dei. Is there anyone else you want to add to your list Catholic puritans?
Your arguements and rebuttals only serve to inflate your seemingly overinflated pride and ego. They do nothing to diminish or discount the over glorification of evil in Harry Potter Books.
Since you are so fond of quotations (I should point out that the othership of ‘the Imitaiton of Christ’ is still disputed and should not necessarily be ascribed to Kempis): “Is it the custom in this country, blockhead, to address knights-errants in such a way?” (Cervantes, 67)
Once again you not only display remarkble ignorance but also petty envy in addressing me:
“All vices, Sancho, bring certain pleasures with them, but envy brings nought but discord, rancour and rage.”(Cervantes, 268)
This very weekend I am staying at the Opus Dei house in Nagasaki while visiting a friend. Do not be so presumptuous as to assume you know my opinions. My only comments on Opus Dei were:
“having been involved in some very traditionalist groups (Opus Dei) in the Church, I must say that Catholic puritanism and fundamentalism does exist.”
This is far from ‘knocking’ Opus Dei, though I do recognize that some members are overzealous (and combined with theological ignorance, that is a dangerous combination).
And concerning the existence of Catholic Puritanism, even the Catholic historian Christopher Dawson notes:
"There are occasions in which Langland surpasses the Puritains thenselves in the grotesqueness of his nomenclature…The spiritual successors of Langland are to be found not in the Catholic Church…but among the Puritans. (Dawson, Medieval Essays. p. 233)
There is no absence of Catholic puritanism in the long history of the Church and this crusade against literature is simply another incarnation of the perenial battle between Chaucer and Langland, Aquinas and Tempier, Abelard and St. Bernard etc. etc. etc.:
“These two great voices of England expressed the two aspects of English character and English culture. Chaucer represents all that England had learnt from its three centuries of incorporation in continental culture. He is a courtier and a scholar who looks at the English scene with humourous detachment…Langland on the other hand, had the scanty learning of a poor clerk” (Dawson, 218-222)
Not only are you trying to be more Cathoilc than the Pope, but also more Catholic than the Inquisition of yester-year.
Your arguements and rebuttals only serve to inflate your seemingly overinflated pride and ego. They do nothing to diminish or discount the over glorification of evil in Harry Potter Books.
And THANK YOU Red Meg: you put it perfectly. Jansenism is a HERESY, but many ultra-traditionalist fanatical Papal Puritans only think that it is possible to err by learning.
These Papal-Puritans are the people who brought St. Francis and St. Ignatius before the Inquisition and condemned St Thomas’ works in 1277. Theirs is a rediculous religion of superstition and anti-intellectualism.
“[Monks and religious] believe that it’s the highest form of piety to be so uneducated that they can’t even read.” (Erasmus, 164)
I am no friend of “The Imitation of Christ”. In point of fact, it is exactly the kind of Catholic/Puritanism that I find disgusting in the traditional branches of the Catholic Church. Even Erasmus (a member of the Bretheren of Common Life) pokes fun at them.
Earlier you wrote:
Harry Potter books are pure folly and offer nothing of value
and
Harry Potter leads to nothing…zilch…zero…naught
Yet
They do nothing to diminish or discount the over glorification of evil in Harry Potter Books.
So which is it contemplative? Are the Harry Potter books evil or unless? I am reminded of the quotation of John Henry Cardinal Newman’s about being either a knave or a fool (Apologia Pro Vita Sua) which is a paraphrase of Quixote’s
“Sometimes of so acute a simplicity that it is no small enjoyment to guess whether he is simple or cunning, he has roguish tricks which condemn him as a knave, and blundering ways which confirm him a fool.” (386)
It would appear that some people have read ‘Praise of Folly’ and taken it too literally. You contemplative are doing a good job at being a ‘fool for Christ’ or atleast a fool for the idol you set up in place of Christ.
Adam