S
Shakuhachi
Guest
And license is confused with “Freedom” and then “Patriotism” to defend it.
I would like to add that many of the “common civilities” of the past were not good at all.I don’t know if “basic morality” is quite the right term. Perhaps a better term would be “common civility.” E.g., a man always opened the door for a lady, and allowed her to enter first. E.g., children always obeyed their school teachers, and if they sassed back or acted up, they were punished immediately and the parents didn’t always hear about it (shock! and lawsuit!" .
These kinds of expectations are largely gone now.
I think that’s a typo. I don’t think Annem was trying to say hundreds of thousands of people.phil19034:
Annem stated that, “Hundreds upon hundreds upon hundreds thousands of violent arsonists, thieves, and and brick throwing leftists…”No one is saying that everyone who peacefully demonstrates is part of the looters. They are not.
Absolutely right, I can only say that yes we often forget the perspective of relativity & fail to see it through the eyes of the ones experiencing it day to day. Lets also not forget that the average ordinary job brings its own dangers to life, such as miners, construction workers, taxi drivers, pilots etc. I can only surmise that as we all apply our craft to better our lives, their will always be an increased risks to our safety.I’m sure it’s a challenge moment to moment. And a lot of stereotypes might fall by the wayside if some of the protesters see and experience what the beat cops see and experience every day.
I agree that dem. & rep. approach the issue of policing from totally different points, however i am mute to the issue of right & left. I am going out on a limb here, but if i could suggest that the balance between the 2 is like a magnet at opposing ends & because one voice seems to be louder, could possibly suggest the other is out of balance. An example might say:Democrats are conservative in many of their viewpoints about various moral and religious issues. So yes, plenty of Democrats in the police force.
Yes this happens a lot & suspect that its rife across many industries. You made some very good points about recruitment & selection & this is where the voting public could have & should have greater transparency & (name removed by moderator)ut into government procedures in general & yes I know they already do but maybe it needs to be even greater.I think a lot of men and women join the police force because they see the ads on TV and think, “Hmm, I’m in pretty good shape. And the pay is good and the benefits…I could probably do that.
99% of the time, you could say almost perfectthe police force generally do a good job serving.
How much of African American fear and distrust of police is based on fears because of past history and racist acts that are now illegal and actionable? Kind of like a lot of women are positive that every other woman is judging them, whereas in reality, most women are thinking about their own troubles and “To Do” list and not paying the slighest attention to other women?The overwhelming majority of police officers are good, honest, hard working people, much more good than bad by far.
Unfortunately the riots have set back changes that were occurring in some predominantly black neighborhoods. Here in Detroit there were markets opening up with fresh food and produce. I am extrapolating from there to other cities admittedly but I can see such changes being reversed and more black children getting their dinners from gas stations and convenience stores, as they were before.These things don’t change by individual will power only. It takes the cooperation of the whole society combined with the responsibility of the individual.
- And, since where religion has been removed from civil society, and the doctrine and authority of divine revelation repudiated, the genuine notion itself of justice and human right is darkened and lost, and the place of true justice and legitimate right is supplied by material force, thence it appears why it is that some, utterly neglecting and disregarding the surest principles of sound reason, dare to proclaim that “the people’s will, manifested by what is called public opinion or in some other way, constitutes a supreme law, free from all divine and human control; and that in the political order accomplished facts, from the very circumstance that they are accomplished, have the force of right.” But who, does not see and clearly perceive that human society, when set loose from the bonds of religion and true justice, can have, in truth, no other end than the purpose of obtaining and amassing wealth, and that (society under such circumstances) follows no other law in its actions, except the unchastened desire of ministering to its own pleasure and interests?
Only the divinely revealed religion has clearly recognized man’s origin and destiny in God, the Creator and Redeemer. The Church invites political authorities to measure their judgments and decisions against this inspired truth about God and man: Societies not recognizing this vision or rejecting it in the name of their independence from God are brought to seek their criteria and goal in themselves or to borrow them from some ideology. Since they do not admit that one can defend an objective criterion of good and evil, they arrogate to themselves an explicit or implicit totalitarian power over man and his destiny, as history shows.51
Once there is no belief in God, in Jesus Christ, relativism takes over. Without foundations of morality, there is no ethical code that can guide society.Once there is no belief in the afterlife, in the final judgement, in heaven and hell, the only “morality” remaining is often just a a relative personal code of conduct that can blow with any wind.