B
BoyGenius
Guest
I agree with that. And you are right.Bear in mind that abortion is a very likely outcome of abuse or rape that leads to pregnancy.
Preventing abuse or rape also prevents abortion.
I agree with that. And you are right.Bear in mind that abortion is a very likely outcome of abuse or rape that leads to pregnancy.
Preventing abuse or rape also prevents abortion.
That made it confusing. When you say “since abortion was legalized”, it sounded like a necessary cause. But beforehand, you refer to the “public’s revulsion about sexual harassment/rape.” That in fact, just from reading it, makes it sound like two necessary causes. And the one condition as a necessary cause: “abortion was legalized” it was what i had focused on/critiqued. Was I mistaken how the statement was presented?As I was pointing out earlier, the public’s lack of enthusiasm for abortion (the number of abortions is down by half since 1980) seems to be tracking with the public’s revulsion about sexual harassment/rape. We currently have the lowest abortion rate since abortion was legalized, while the 1970s were both rape-y and had a high abortion rate.
I’m not going to get drawn in to the derailment. But to just make one comment: You’re right. Women who are pro-choice should not be protected from harassment or afforded dignity.I find it not just hard, but as well as undermined by the contradiction, to defend the dignity of a woman, especially in the sphere of sexual harassment, who abuse another human being themselves or promote (And I am referring to women who support, promote, or commit an abortion.)
The “since” meant “from the time” not “because.”When you say “since abortion was legalized”, it sounded like a necessary cause.
And the branding wherefore women are objectified in Television themes like “Two and a Half Men”, and “How I Met Your Mother” are not somehow linked to this crazed sexual drive that men seem to connect the dots to the hookup lifestyle that makes women look like a sport?Sexual harassment has been around for as long as humans have. It’s not some special byproduct of the sexual revolution or whatever.
Hmm…I shoulda watched more television and had more fun before I got married.And the branding wherefore women are objectified in Television themes like “Two and a Half Men”, and “How I Met Your Mother” are not somehow linked to this crazed sexual drive that men seem to connect the dots to the hookup lifestyle that makes women look like a sport?
Which, nevertheless, proceeds to men touching women in a way that violates her dignity, and respect to her? Whether she concedes to the engagement or not?
So, we mutually misunderstood each other’s point of view. Did not mean to misunderstand. The word “since” - as I understood it. Meant since this, then that. Not time, but as a causal.I’ll add that from the PR point of view, the argument you’re making is going to come across as, “I care about the baby in your tummy, but I don’t care about you,” if protecting women from harassment and rape is contingent on no woman anywhere ever having an abortion.
TV fun is different from the real life version.Hmm…I shoulda watched more television and had more fun before I got married.
The logic is sound, but it’s not going to persuade the target audience.And to point out that my defense of the unborn, as I stated, falls on the Golden Rule. Wherefore, if I advocate for the respect and dignity owed to the unborn child. I am therefore signifying quite well as appealing to the woman nevertheless as she would want/desire and is owed to be treated (with respect to her dignity as a human person, not as an object.) Thus, as one of the Two Greatest Commandments states: Love thy neighbor as you love thy self.
To begin, my first comments were that first, certain shows brand objectifying women (Again, as I stressed before. Sheen led a character with promiscuous living habits. And then offscreen, did likewise, and ended with AIDS.) Wherefore, second, I had stated in Hollywood (which I understand the origin of the MeToo hashtag appears to be rooted from) [Hollywood] has branded the image of making women objects. I had even stated somewhere on this thread that men do talk about having hookups with women as some sort of achievement. Which seems nothing to do with love, respect, and dignity owed to a woman. Third, and perhaps lastly, I then questioned the culture in general, wherefore among the population are women who support abortion, but nonetheless are outspoken critics to sexual harassment. I guess not lastly, but now finally, drew upon contradiction that women (those who support abortion) want the respect owed to them, but nonetheless denies that to be owed to an unborn human being. I then reasoned from there, that contradicts the respect and dignity that is owed to them. And therefore undermines the culture (if I had not said it exactly, still nevertheless is implied) of Justice.I’ll add that from the PR point of view, the argument you’re making is going to come across as, “I care about the baby in your tummy, but I don’t care about you,” if protecting women from harassment and rape is contingent on no woman anywhere ever having an abortion.
Well, it would be compelling, but it would be a different kind of TV.Yea, sex on TV is always glamorous and consequence-free. STDs are non-existent and there is no jealousy, emotional problems, or unplanned pregnancies. It wouldn’t make for compelling TV for a character to be on constant antibiotics and have a heap of baby mama drama.
Would the same co-worker go around telling men they look nice?I have been unsure ever since a woman told me she was offended because a co- worker told her she “looked nice”.
If you are, at least you’re an equal opportunity sexist boor.I would and do sometimes when new clothes or haircuts are sported. Does that make me a sexist boor?