K
KEVIN_WILCOX
Guest
Mrs Sally
As I write, there are sins in the past which were considered sins. Nowadays there seems to have crept in some leniency. To have confessed sins which a few years back were considered ethically and morally wrong to be told they are not sins (I am not referring to a priest being “un-scolding” in approach) and that I had only come in for a social, I find very odd, bewildering and confusing. It leads one into greater sin or to continuing in one’s action that a few years ago would have been frowned upon.
Some words of encouragement and advice in the right direction would be welcome, I am not suggesting “spiritual guidance in depth” should be given; as you rightly suggest this can be arranged for some other time. To reduce confessing to reciting a list because “there are people behind oneself in the queue” who “may appreciate it” is questionable.
As I write, there are sins in the past which were considered sins. Nowadays there seems to have crept in some leniency. To have confessed sins which a few years back were considered ethically and morally wrong to be told they are not sins (I am not referring to a priest being “un-scolding” in approach) and that I had only come in for a social, I find very odd, bewildering and confusing. It leads one into greater sin or to continuing in one’s action that a few years ago would have been frowned upon.
Some words of encouragement and advice in the right direction would be welcome, I am not suggesting “spiritual guidance in depth” should be given; as you rightly suggest this can be arranged for some other time. To reduce confessing to reciting a list because “there are people behind oneself in the queue” who “may appreciate it” is questionable.