Hillary Clinton Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cider
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
That is an excellent point!

Advantage: More is at stake so, ideally, voters would have to think more…not that it happens. 😊

Disadvantage: lose by one vote, lose it all.
Well you don’t have to seem so surprised SuperLuigi. Once in awhile, I admit not necessarily always, I might make an excellent point! 😃 A blessed Happy Easter to you and yours!
 
That is an excellent point!

Advantage: More is at stake so, ideally, voters would have to think more…not that it happens. 😊

Disadvantage: lose by one vote, lose it all.
It is an odd system, but it places a lot more power into the delegates of the state being sent to the convention. The will of the voter reigns supreme as long as a candidate has enough delegates committed to supporting him through to a first ballot victory.

After the first ballot, the delegate has all the power, and the voter is no longer a part of the process, except as one of the considerations that the delegate makes about the general election to follow.

It is not really a democracy, but then again most Americans insist on that point that theirs is not a democracy.
 
that makes me laugh!
Bill was a great president in my opinion. I saw crime in my neighborhood in Dallas really drop. Hispanics from the community were getting help with college. Not some local community college, but with schools like Harvard and Notre dame.

Look bill did some stupid things. His hands were dirty since Arkansas. Mind you, the whole Monica thing was a big joke on his part. But let’s be honest, how many politicians don’t have any skeletons in their closet?
 
Bill was a great president in my opinion. I saw crime in my neighborhood in Dallas really drop. Hispanics from the community were getting help with college. Not some local community college, but with schools like Harvard and Notre dame.

Look bill did some stupid things. His hands were dirty since Arkansas. Mind you, the whole Monica thing was a big joke on his part. But let’s be honest, how many politicians don’t have any skeletons in their closet?
Since they are all humans, none.
 
Since they are all humans, none.
Exactly. I was watching race for the White House last week on cnn.

It was presidential race were Lincoln won. Now Lincoln has one of the best raps of all our presidents. But some of the things that his backers did, would have made you say, wow. I mean we could play, good Saint bad Saint, but at the end of the day I’m glad his backers did what they did to get him elected.
 
I think something that really helps her, is her husband. A lot of lower and middle class people did succeed in his presidency. So a lot of people make the deduction that if she becomes president it’ll be like Bill’s presidency.
I agree with this assessment.
 
Equal? If Trump beats Cruz by 1 vote in a winner take all state, Cruz voters meant nothing. Trump gets all the delegates. Democrats proportion theirs better.
Just speaking for myself personally, I don’t really have a problem with winner take all states; I just have a problem with the way some people embrace the rules that help them (like winner take all states) but start talking about riots when they encounter rules that don’t help them (like needing a majority of delegates).
 
I agree with this assessment.
Hi Little Sheep, I am glad I found you here tonight. Although you might now be retired from CAF til after the Easter holiday.

But we have had a lot of discussion about superdelegates as you well know.

Anyway, as I was watching a bit of coverage about Bernie’s wins in Alaska and Washington, not unexpected I imagine even in the Clinton camp, the pundits were discussing delegates.

And as I understood it, besides Hillary receiving 2.6 million more votes than Bernie as of earlier this wk, she actually still has a larger lead in delegates than Obama had over her in 08 at this stage among pledged delegates - those that are not superdelegates.

Is that correct?

I thought if anyone on CAF could confirm this for those misunderstanding the superdelegate math, it would be none other than Little Sheep.
 
Hi Little Sheep, I am glad I found you here tonight. Although you might now be retired from CAF til after the Easter holiday.

But we have had a lot of discussion about superdelegates as you well know.

Anyway, as I was watching a bit of coverage about Bernie’s wins in Alaska and Washington, not unexpected I imagine even in the Clinton camp, the pundits were discussing delegates.

And as I understood it, besides Hillary receiving 2.6 million more votes than Bernie as of earlier this wk, she actually still has a larger lead in delegates than Obama had over her in 08 at this stage among pledged delegates - those that are not superdelegates.

Is that correct?

I thought if anyone on CAF could confirm this for those misunderstanding the superdelegate math, it would be none other than Little Sheep.
This is my understanding right now, SN. 🙂

I wish the fullness of Easter to you and yours. I am a little lost in Spirit tonight, as I imagine you are.

A new Day comes and Hope springs eternal for us all.

God Bless,

Little Sheep
 
This is my understanding right now, SN. 🙂

I wish the fullness of Easter to you and yours. I am a little lost in Spirit tonight, as I imagine you are.

A new Day comes and Hope springs eternal for us all.

God Bless,

Little Sheep
Indeed and likewise to you and yours, LS. A new dawn awaits. Alleluia! Amen.
 
I expected landslide wins for Bernie in Washington and Alaska, Sy, but not in Hawaii, Obama’s home state, yet there it is: 70%-30%. I kind of expect him to take Wisconsin. But I think Hillary will be strong in Pennsylvania, New York, and California. Huge number of delegates at stake there.

Happy Easter!
 
I expected landslide wins for Bernie in Washington and Alaska, Sy, but not in Hawaii, Obama’s home state, yet there it is: 70%-30%. I kind of expect him to take Wisconsin. But I think Hillary will be strong in Pennsylvania, New York, and California. Huge number of delegates at stake there.

Happy Easter!
CONGRATS to Bernie and a blessed Holy Easter to you, LB!
 
I don’t know if I would say that exactly, but I would say he wasn’t as liberal as Hillary.
Something that helped bill not be so liberal was how the democrats lost control of the house. The man knew if he wanted to get stuff done he had to speak to republicans. Were they still acting like little kids? Of course, but the republicans in congress and Clinton in the White House knew in order to get work done, they had to set their egos aside.
 
Something that helped bill not be so liberal was how the democrats lost control of the house. The man knew if he wanted to get stuff done he had to speak to republicans. Were they still acting like little kids? Of course, but the republicans in congress and Clinton in the White House knew in order to get work done, they had to set their egos aside.
And yet Obama has done exactly the opposite. And how has it worked out: the GOP is tripping over itself, if not destroying itself, trying to figure out whether to cooperate with him or not.
 
Well you don’t have to seem so surprised SuperLuigi. Once in awhile, I admit not necessarily always, I might make an excellent point! 😃 A blessed Happy Easter to you and yours!
I just call it like I see it on here. 🙂

Easter Blessings!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top