Hillary Clinton Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cider
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Saddest thing about all of this is that with her statements Hillary is depending on the ignorance. Of the. Electorate to get away with this,
Well,it has worked for her up to now,so,no surprise that she is true to form :rolleyes:
 
Saddest thing about all of this is that with her statements Hillary is depending on the ignorance. Of the. Electorate to get away with this,
If she is the nominee, I will vote for her, and I can assure you that I am not ignorant. Quite the contrary.
 
If she is the nominee, I will vote for her, and I can assure you that I am not ignorant. Quite the contrary.
For some, though, it will be a matter of ignorance. For others, it’s a matter of approving what she stands for.
 
no. I miss the 4 Americans killed there on the anniversary of 9/11.
There is always a risk of casualties in any use of military force. So are you a pacifist who is against the use of all military force no matter what the circumstances?
 
If she is the nominee, I will vote for her, and I can assure you that I am not ignorant. Quite the contrary.
So you are aware of her ethical lapses, and are OK with with her as our leader?
I’m speaking of repetitive lying to the public, breaking the law to avoid scrutiny, and selling favors for cash.
 
There is always a risk of casualties in any use of military force. So are you a pacifist who is against the use of all military force no matter what the circumstances?
it would have been nice if these 4 Americans killed could have received military force to rescue them.
 
So you are aware of her ethical lapses, and are OK with with her as our leader?
I’m speaking of repetitive lying to the public, breaking the law to avoid scrutiny, and selling favors for cash.
I’ll just say she’s the only candidate, besides Sanders, I trust to lead the US, and I think even Hillary would be preferable in case of war.
 
it would have been nice if these 4 Americans killed could have received military force to rescue them.
They were offered extra security by the military, but Chris Stevens refused. No one anticipated the attack, so no one could have rescued Stevens and the other three, but yes, it’s tragic that they died. Those guilty are the ones who planned and carried out the attack.

Chris Stevens asked that security not be increased:

readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/21554-five-reasons-benghazi-wasnt-hilary-clintons-fault

Does that make it his fault? No, of course not. Again, the fault lies with those who carried out the attack.
 
They were offered extra security by the military, but Chris Stevens refused. No one anticipated the attack, so no one could have rescued Stevens and the other three, but yes, it’s tragic that they died. Those guilty are the ones who planned and carried out the attack.

Chris Stevens asked that security not be increased:

readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/21554-five-reasons-benghazi-wasnt-hilary-clintons-fault

Does that make it his fault? No, of course not. Again, the fault lies with those who carried out the attack.
It takes the greatest leap of imagination to fault Hillary for the terrible tragedy at Benghazi. I don’t know that I’ve ever respected her more than I did at that hearing. She did an outstanding job as SOS. Benghazi was a partisan witch hunt - members of the Republican Party admitted as much.

Many more Americans died in embassies across the world under the Bush Administration. Where was the outrage then?
 
ijreview.com/2014/05/138727-viral-meme-13-benghazis-happened-bush-taken-apart-destroyed-eyes/
One of the best-known versions of this meme is the ridiculous screed at Huffington Post “13 Benghazis That Occurred on Bush’s Watch Without a Peep from Fox News,” which has around 90K shares and likely well over a million views.
The post was nearly replicated on numerous left-wing sites, such as DailyKos, the Daily Banter, and PolicyMic.
Here goes: the “13 Benghazis That Occurred on Bush’s Watch Without a Peep from Fox News” – cases versus reality
 
Does it matter if they were Americans or not? They were killed on American soil, under a Republican SoS and a Republican president. Are not ALL humans are brothers and sisters in Christ? I think they are.

readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/21554-five-reasons-benghazi-wasnt-hilary-clintons-fault

Many, many people were killed on American soil under Bush’s watch. Eight Americans in just one incident:

“May 12, 2003: In a series of attacks, suicide bombers blew themselves up in a truck loaded with explosives in a complex that housed staff working for U.S. defense firm Vinnell in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. (The contractors worked out of the U.S. embassy.) At least eight Americans were killed in the incident. Al-Qaida was suspected responsible for the incident. This was one of three attacks, involving at least nine suicide bombers and suspected to have involved 19 perpetrators overall.”

Are the dozens of people killed under Bush’s SoS less important than Stevens? I don’t think they are. I think God loves all people equally.
 
Does it matter if they were Americans or not? They were killed on American soil, under a Republican SoS and a Republican president. Are not ALL humans are brothers and sisters in Christ? I think they are.

readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/21554-five-reasons-benghazi-wasnt-hilary-clintons-fault
The poster to whom I was responded specifically referenced Americans killed, so that’s the remark to which I responded. So I’m not really sure where your comment is coming from. Maybe take issue with (or address your questions to) the poster who referenced “Americans”? 🤷
 
The poster to whom I was responded specifically referenced Americans killed, so that’s the remark to which I responded. So I’m not really sure where your comment is coming from. Maybe take issue with the poster who referenced “Americans”? 🤷
Okay, I didn’t mean to single you out.

At any rate, I did post a snippet about eight Americans that were killed at an embassy under Bush’s SoS.

Sorry if you felt I singled you out. I did not mean to do that.

Edit: There’s no poster’s name in your post; that’s why I responded to you. Still, I apologize if I offended you or you felt singled out. I did not mean to do that.
 
The poster to whom I was responded specifically referenced Americans killed, so that’s the remark to which I responded. So I’m not really sure where your comment is coming from. Maybe take issue with (or address your questions to) the poster who referenced “Americans”? 🤷
And according to the link you posted, 10 Americans were killed. That’s more than were killed in Benghazi.

Republicans have already admitted to the witchhunt regarding Benghazi. I understand that they’re scared of Hillary. They should be.
 
I’ve never seen that, so thanks for sharing.

That said, even Fox News admitted the Benghazi hullabaloo was a partisan effort aimed to take Hillary out. Clearly, it failed.
Here’s the link for that, LS:

mediamatters.org/research/2015/10/16/fox-news-finally-concedes-benghazi-committee-is/206217

“Two Congressmen And Ex-Benghazi Committee Staffer Admit Partisan Nature Of The Committee. Since September 29, three credible Republicans have admitted to the partisan nature of the House Select Committee on Benghazi and its primary goal of tarnishing Hillary Clinton. While the first admission may have been inadvertent – House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) boasted that the committee had achieved its goal of damaging Clinton’s poll numbers during an interview with Fox News about his candidacy for House Speaker – since then, former Benghazi committee staffer Bradley F. Podliska and a second Republican congressman, Rep. Richard Hanna (R-NY), have come forward and admitted the committee was “designed to go after” Clinton. [Media]”

I’m glad Hillary has not stooped to their level.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top