Hillary Clinton Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Thorolfr
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Theo520 said:
EXCLUSIVE: Hillary Clinton’s emails packed with America’s secrets were stored by company ‘wide open to hackers’ and run by ‘morons’ whistleblowers reveal

The company that put her server in a bathroom (Platte River Networks) hired another, even more inept company, to mirror said server (Datto Inc). Sounds like they kept backups for 3 yrs, maybe the FBI has her 50k personal emails?

More bad news from a national security perspective.
Click to expand...
I’m confused. Is the article saying they recovered 30,000 emails that Hillary deleted? And that the emails she deleted were classified?
 
These two IT companies were not meant to handle sensitive government information, and didn’t know they were. The sensitive info got out of the system it was in, and got it into Platte River’s and Datto’s systems; the FBI is trying to figure out how that happened.
 
Zzyzx_Road said:
Silver wasn’t just wrong about Trump in the beginning, he stayed wrong about Trump well into the actual primary season. I would take this one with a grain of salt.

That said, it’s the swing states that are key. Trump must take most if not all of them to have a chance.
Click to expand...
The most recent polls show Hillary Clinton leading by 4-17 percent in all of the battleground states. I don’t think that Trump has much of a chance of becoming President. Trump can’t even win over members of his own party, let alone unaffiliated women and minorities. It’s shaping up to be a landslide that will win the presidency for the Democrats, most likely a majority in the Senate, and possibly a House majority, although that is a more remote possibility with the gerrymandering in Republican-controlled states. At the very least, it seems that there will be a lot of Clinton-appointed judges from the Supreme court on down.
 
adawgj said:
With a good number of Sanders’s supporters pledging to not vote for Clinton, this prediction could be off.
Click to expand...
The number of Sander’s supporters who say they will not vote for Hillary is around 10% now. He hasn’t done much to help her at this point, so that’s not that bad.
 
Good_Tidings said:
The number of Sander’s supporters who say they will not vote for Hillary is around 10% now. He hasn’t done much to help her at this point, so that’s not that bad.
Click to expand...
Its actually better than the percentage of Clinton supporters that said they supported Obama prior to the convention in '08.

Its still pretty early for both parties. I think the Dems will pull together behind Hillary. Trump will have more of a challenge getting the GOP to line up behind him, IMO, but there are plenty of partisans out there that only care about the (R) behind his name. The election will likely be closer than current polls suggest, but its certainly true that Hillary has the advantage at this point.
 
It is just a really good idea when getting and sending Top Secret emails, to follow security procedures. The government felt strongly enough to make it against the law to have your own unsecured email server.

Rules and laws don’t apply to super powerful politicians though so I guess Hilary and others will be just fine. Along with the Chinese, Russians, North Koreans and anybody else with a computer who wants to see American “secrets.”
 
TMC said:
Its actually better than the percentage of Clinton supporters that said they supported Obama prior to the convention in '08.

Its still pretty early for both parties. I think the Dems will pull together behind Hillary. Trump will have more of a challenge getting the GOP to line up behind him, IMO, but there are plenty of partisans out there that only care about the (R) behind his name. The election will likely be closer than current polls suggest, but its certainly true that Hillary has the advantage at this point.
Click to expand...
More and more Republicans are coming out against Trump. Trump, himself, said he was fighting on two fronts. That can’t bode well.
 
Zzyzx_Road said:
Silver wasn’t just wrong about Trump in the beginning, he stayed wrong about Trump well into the actual primary season. I would take this one with a grain of salt.

That said, it’s the swing states that are key. Trump must take most if not all of them to have a chance.
Click to expand...
It’s been like that for a while. The working assumption is that Democrats start with 240 electoral votes because they dominate New York and the rest of the Acela corridor, California, the Rust Belt. If Republicans had nominated Bush, or any of the other established candidates, that would likely be the position we’d be in now. With Trump, however, he’s more of a wildcard in that he could put some states in play haven’t been in play for a while. Couple that with how truly dreadful a candidate Clinton is and I think this could be a very interesting election.
 
esieffe said:
It is just a really good idea when getting and sending Top Secret emails, to follow security procedures. The government felt strongly enough to make it against the law to have your own unsecured email server.

Rules and laws don’t apply to super powerful politicians though so I guess Hilary and others will be just fine. Along with the Chinese, Russians, North Koreans and anybody else with a computer who wants to see American “secrets.”
Click to expand...
That she is even the presumptive nominee in spite of all her corrupt and egregious actions is just as much an ndictment on those who support her .God help us all.I pray we get the leader we need not the one we deserve.😦
 
Nelka said:
I’m sorry but I fear that Clinton will be the next USA president.
Click to expand...
if that happens, I will have to move to a country which doesn’t force tax payers to pay for abortion and actually cares about preventing terrorist attacks. Hilary would love to just continue open borders AND is for more and more gun control (the only control I am for is a firearms safety class for first time users, that’s about it.)

She belongs behind bars - she compromised the security of the nation.
 
I think they need to go back further into Hillarys past and see what else she has released and to whom, I know for a fact back in the early 90s, after Lawrence Rockefeller bugged her too many times, she eventually agreed to meet with him, Ive seen pictures of the two of them strolling around his ranch, she had an arm load of file folders, I cant believe she caved to Rockefellers requests and no one back then ever said a word about it???

My opinion, if she gave in for him, its very likely she gave in to other requests, or was negligent with keeping stuff secret.
 
It’s ludicrous that anyone with such damning evidence against them, Democrat or Republican, could be allowed to run. In the case of Hillary, she was not some newbie politician, and should certainly have known better, which to me makes her even more culpable than an inexperienced state “employee”.
 
jediliz said:
if that happens, I will have to move to a country which doesn’t force tax payers to pay for abortion and actually cares about preventing terrorist attacks. Hilary would love to just continue open borders AND is for more and more gun control (the only control I am for is a firearms safety class for first time users, that’s about it.)

She belongs behind bars - she compromised the security of the nation.
Click to expand...
You already DO live in such a country.
 
SecretCatholic said:
It’s ludicrous that anyone with such damning evidence against them, Democrat or Republican, could be allowed to run. In the case of Hillary, she was not some newbie politician, and should certainly have known better, which to me makes her even more culpable than an inexperienced state “employee”.
Click to expand...
None of this matters. She is a Democrat and that party will vote for her. The fact that she has been surrounded by scandals and suggestions of scandals all of her public life does not matter.
 
This is why Hillary is not qualified to be President. She may put national security in danger.
 
Thorolfr said:
Nate Silver was pretty accurate in predicting the outcome of the last election. He predicted that Obama would win 332 to Romney’s 206 in the electoral college.
Click to expand...
538 is great - called most of the primaries for both Repubs and Dems very accurately in 2015-16. He’s my go-to for accurate polling information.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top