How a married gay Catholic couple live their faith

  • Thread starter Thread starter zz912
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, I pray that all the priest, that believe as Father Victor does, would please protest by leaving the priesthood. Even If it means a major priest shortage.

Our Father will never abandon his church… we will be alright.
Why not pray that he and others see and come to understand the errors of their viewpoints and actions and stay on with a new vigor and love for the Church and her Teachings?

Praying for him and other Priests to just leave is a uncharitable imho.

God bless you and merry christmas to you and your loved ones.
 
How do you know it is God’s embrace, or that it is perfect? These are absolutes that require substantiation. Additionally, you must be able to describe how we are to journey, in which direction, and how we will know. Otherwise you are just a blind man leading other blind men, and both will fall into a hole.
My understanding of what CSF is trying to explain is that “no-one is beyond salvation”. i.e. yes right now they may be committing a mortal sin in the eyes of God but that does not mean that they are beyond redemption.

We don’t know what the future holds for them or us and many have come to convert and seek God later on in their lives. This is the journey he is talking about. Work out our own salvation with fear and trembling.

ComplineSanFran please correct me if I am wrong.
 
Why not pray that he and others see and come to understand the errors of their viewpoints and actions and stay on with a new vigor and love for the Church and her Teachings?

Praying for him and other Priests to just leave is a uncharitable imho.

God bless you and merry christmas to you and your loved ones.
I don’t think so, I think what is uncharitable is the scandal someone like this creates is leading many people out of the faith and into the grip of Satan. Just look at the level of agreement with this priest from catholics even in this forum. The Relativistic Ideas this ideaolgies blind people to the sin that they condone.

No I think it would be better for Catholics and the Church if these priest decided to be true to themselves and left.
 
The majority of those with advanced degrees and living in the Western Industrialized countries do not look upon LGBTQ humans as disordered. Priests are generally well educated, many having post grad degrees. Have you ever witnessed a priest refuse to offer the Eucharist to a person that is gay? I was not specifically speaking of gay marriage, but of supporting loved ones who are in a loving and long term monogamous relationship and happen to be gay, not straight. What I thought when I read the OP is that this couple is lucky to have such a loving family. I would never advocate for the Church to perform marriage ceremonies for gay couples since it is still forbidden, however; I see no harm, much less scandal, in attending the civil ceremony or other religious marriage celebration for those that are in love 💘 and wish to let it be known that they are in a lifetime relationship.

Yes, I understand that my stance is not that of many traditionalists, so be it. 🤷
I have not seen a priest outright deny but rather give a warning to those who were either not Catholic or in a state of grace to not come to communion. My husband made sure that his 2 brothers, both being in sinful marriages/relationships, quietly approached the communion line for a blessing only.
 
Sy Noe, I admire you for your perseverance in this discussion. As you know, I live in San Francisco. Situations like this happen quite frequently. And gay and lesbian couples are active in their local parish churches. It’s normal. No one thinks twice about it. We have priests who are actively out and quite active in LGBT issues. I think one poster said that perhaps the priest wanted to make a point of what he hoped would change within the church. From the friends and colleagues I know personally, that would most likely be the case.

On the other hand, a family wedding is a family wedding. Perhaps he’ll be honored to perform a baptism in the near future.
I don’t think Archbishop Cordileone would take kindly to his priests being “out.”
 
Sy Noe, I admire you for your perseverance in this discussion. As you know, I live in San Francisco. Situations like this happen quite frequently. And gay and lesbian couples are active in their local parish churches. It’s normal. No one thinks twice about it. We have priests who are actively out and quite active in LGBT issues. I think one poster said that perhaps the priest wanted to make a point of what he hoped would change within the church. From the friends and colleagues I know personally, that would most likely be the case.

On the other hand, a family wedding is a family wedding. Perhaps he’ll be honored to perform a baptism in the near future.
I don’t think Archbishop Cordileone would take kindly to his priests being “out.”
 
My understanding of what CSF is trying to explain is that “no-one is beyond salvation”. i.e. yes right now they may be committing a mortal sin in the eyes of God but that does not mean that they are beyond redemption.

We don’t know what the future holds for them or us and many have come to convert and seek God later on in their lives. This is the journey he is talking about. Work out our own salvation with fear and trembling.

ComplineSanFran please correct me if I am wrong.
Perhaps if we think of this in terms of vocation, it might be more helpful. God is calling us by name. That voice is one that we hear all our lives, and our journey is to follow that calling. ‘I have called you by name and you are mine.’ as is said in Isaiah. ‘Follow me…’

Salvation? I am not a Christian that asks people if they are saved. It is not a word I use often. My words are grace and mercy and vocation/calling. God’s love will take care of redemption. It’s not mine to worry about. My job is to stay in that love and mercy. If my whole life is devoted to that, how can I not recognize God’s voice?
 
Regarding the amount of priests in San Francisco who are homosexual:

Being curious, I looked up the percentage of homosexual persons in San Francisco (6.2%) (gallup.com/poll/182051/san-francisco-metro-area-ranks-highest-lgbt-percentage.aspx)andand) then looked up the number of priests in San Francisco (396) (catholic-hierarchy.org/diocese/dsnfr.html), did the math and figured that about 25 priests might be homosexual, presuming that priests reflect the same percentages as the general population. Somehow, I think there might be less homosexuals in the priesthood than the general population, given the fact that homosexual behavior is considered disordered by the Catholic Church and that application to the priesthood presumably involves some sort of screening process, where admitted homosexual orientated men might be encouraged not to apply.

Earlier comments indicated an estimate of 50% by a person who knew of lot of Catholic priests in San Francisco, so that would be closer to 200 men. Seems high to me.
 
My understanding of what CSF is trying to explain is that “no-one is beyond salvation”. i.e. yes right now they may be committing a mortal sin in the eyes of God but that does not mean that they are beyond redemption.

We don’t know what the future holds for them or us and many have come to convert and seek God later on in their lives. This is the journey he is talking about. Work out our own salvation with fear and trembling.

ComplineSanFran please correct me if I am wrong.
Oh I know what he’s trying to say. And to a certain extent, there is some truth in the statement that everyone has a journey they should take towards holiness. But what CSF is trying to do is to excuse or condone sin (homosexual acts) as their journey to God and perfection, so it is okay for them to sin. That is the error and falsehood.

Persisting in manifest, grave sin will not get you to holiness or God. Only through fighting against sin can we ultimately make it to perfection and God. That is not the case CSF is trying to portray. CSF wants to condone homosexual acts since everyone is on a journey.

My posts were pointing out the logical fallacy of such a position. The point of a journey is the destination, and the destination is God. So to reach our destination, we must know the direction we are going and how to get there. If someone is trying to reach the summit of Mt. Everest, you don’t hand them a shovel and tell them to start digging. And you don’t encourage them to keep digging, because they are on a “journey” to the summit of Mt. Everest. No amount of digging will help them reach the summit, and it actually takes them farther away from the summit. Encouraging them to keep digging is wrong and cruel.

To reach the summit of Mt. Everest, you need a clear definition of where and WHAT the summit is. Then you need instruction on how to make the climb, you need tools for the climb, you need guides for the climb, and you need friends to help you.

What you DON’T need is someone telling you to keep digging.
 
Why would you assume that? That is taking things a bit to an extreme, isn’t it?

My beliefs are intricately woven into my journey with Christ. I am always learning and growing in those beliefs, as I assume, everyone is. I take my theology quite seriously, and each day I must hammer it out, to quote one of my mentors.

If I were totally wrong in hammering that out, I know that God would let me know in some way. Instead, I have the joy of discovery and inspiration and discipleship. And because I am human, I only get glimpses of the fullness of Christ. How in the world could anyone be infallible as they journey through life? We cannot know God in that way, ever, until we are in his Presence.
I’m not assuming anything. I asked you if you would change your views when God tells you they are wrong. You said God has not done so. So your views must therefore be without error, ever. Hence you are infallible and inerrant.
 
How do I know God? Good grief! Because I know God. Don’t you?
You know Him perfectly? You know His views on homosexual acts? Perfectly? When and where did you receive this revelation? Please do describe God’s perfect views on homosexual acts.
 
Subjectivism is the philosophical tenet that “our own mental activity is the only unquestionable fact of our experience”. In other words, subjectivism is the doctrine that knowledge is merely subjective and that there is no external or objective truth. 😃
 
Subjectivism is the philosophical tenet that “our own mental activity is the only unquestionable fact of our experience”. In other words, subjectivism is the doctrine that knowledge is merely subjective and that there is no external or objective truth. 😃
Much like the advice George Costanza gave Jerry as he was going in to take a polygraph: “Just remember this, it’s not a lie if you believe it”.
 
Regarding the amount of priests in San Francisco who are homosexual:

Being curious, I looked up the percentage of homosexual persons in San Francisco (6.2%) (gallup.com/poll/182051/san-francisco-metro-area-ranks-highest-lgbt-percentage.aspx)andand) then looked up the number of priests in San Francisco (396) (catholic-hierarchy.org/diocese/dsnfr.html), did the math and figured that about 25 priests might be homosexual, presuming that priests reflect the same percentages as the general population. Somehow, I think there might be less homosexuals in the priesthood than the general population, given the fact that homosexual behavior is considered disordered by the Catholic Church and that application to the priesthood presumably involves some sort of screening process, where admitted homosexual orientated men might be encouraged not to apply.

Earlier comments indicated an estimate of 50% by a person who knew of lot of Catholic priests in San Francisco, so that would be closer to 200 men. Seems high to me.
My bolding and underlining.

What gives you this impression? My own experience, what has been shared with me by friends in priesthood and seminary, and everything I read about the Church is the opposite.
 
I luv me sum impressions.

50%, that’s an impression.
Oh, wait! We’re talking about human beings? Are they impressed with our impressions? Impress your impressions on their foreheads, that 50%,
so we all know who they are.

McCarthy would be impressed for sure.
 
He did nothing to contravene his vows or Church teachings. He stated his opinion and attended a ceremony of family member. I’m pretty sure it has happened before that a priest has attended the wedding of a family member who was divorced and did not have their marriage annulled.
Agreed. Removing him is harsh. He was just extending kindness to family members.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top