How can people say homosexuality doesn't hurt anyone

  • Thread starter Thread starter Catholic13
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
That’s easy, silly!
By being good people who love and take care of and are kind to their loved ones, friends, and fellow human beings-- they do not cause harm!

In fact, that kind of behavior brings a lot of good!

.
You’re misrepresenting what’s been said, silly. Explain how homosexual behavior doesn’t cause harm. Because you said it doesn’t.
 
That isn’t part of Catholic belief. You said specifically that being Catholic causes harm. You’re flailing wildly.
Well if you review the definition of Catholic you’ll find that while it can mean the religion or belief system, it can also be used to describe followers of the religion. Hence being Catholic causes harm for the reasons I’ve repeatedly state and you have not addressed.
 
I find myself having to repeat myself because you (seemingly) don’t understand what I am saying.

My argument is:

Homosexuality does not cause disease.
Heterosexuality does not cause disease.
Some homosexual acts can lead to disease.
Some heterosexual acts can lead to disease.

So what are the two things that don’t change?
  1. Sexual orientation does not cause disease.
  2. Sexual acts can cause disease.
Lou
It is an undeniable fact that homosexuality (The participation in or desire to participate in sexual conduct with those of the same sex.) spreads disease.

“STD’s at epidemic level within gay communities nation wide”.-- Center for Disease Control

cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/HIVFactSheets/TodaysEpidemic-508.pdf

More than half of new HIV infections occur among gay and bisexual men. Heterosexual men account for only 25%. Note that homosexuals account for less than 3% of the total population. That is staggering…3% spread half of all HIV infections nationwide.

It is absurd to compare the spread of disease within the homosexual community with the heterosexual community. The rate of disease among homosexuals is extremely higher than heterosexuals. Also just because STD’s exist in the heterosexual community is no reason to justify unnatural sexual relations. In other words…two wrongs don’t make it right.

It can be said, based on the spread of disease alone, no one can say that homosexuality does not hurt anyone. STD’s HIV and AIDS are a danger to the homosexual community and a public health threat to society.

Homosexuality also harms society.

In reality, homosexuality is nothing more than same-gender conduct among people who are innately and unchangeably heterosexual. Homosexuality is thus biologically (and to varying degrees morally) equivalent to pedophilia, sado-masochism, bestiality and many other forms of deviant behavior, or behavior that deviates from the normal design-based function of the human being.
 
It is an undeniable fact that homosexuality (The participation in or desire to participate in sexual conduct with those of the same sex.) spreads disease.

“STD’s at epidemic level within gay communities nation wide”.-- Center for Disease Control

cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/HIVFactSheets/TodaysEpidemic-508.pdf

More than half of new HIV infections occur among gay and bisexual men. Heterosexual men account for only 25%. Note that homosexuals account for less than 3% of the total population. That is staggering…3% spread half of all HIV infections nationwide.

It is absurd to compare the spread of disease within the homosexual community with the heterosexual community. The rate of disease among homosexuals is extremely higher than heterosexuals. Also just because STD’s exist in the heterosexual community is no reason to justify unnatural sexual relations. In other words…two wrongs don’t make it right.

It can be said, based on the spread of disease alone, no one can say that homosexuality does not hurt anyone. STD’s HIV and AIDS are a danger to the homosexual community and a public health threat to society.

Homosexuality also harms society.

In reality, homosexuality is nothing more than same-gender conduct among people who are innately and unchangeably heterosexual. Homosexuality is thus biologically (and to varying degrees morally) equivalent to pedophilia, sado-masochism, bestiality and many other forms of deviant behavior, or behavior that deviates from the normal design-based function of the human being.
It looks like you’ve finally found someone who avidly supports your “homosexuality spreads disease” nonsense, Catholic13. :rolleyes:
 
It is an undeniable fact that homosexuality (The participation in or desire to participate in sexual conduct with those of the same sex.) spreads disease
Homosexual acts can cause disease, just like any other sexual activity.
Also just because STD’s exist in the heterosexual community is no reason to justify unnatural sexual relations. In other words…two wrongs don’t make it right.
You cannot say that homosexuality can spread disease and leave it at that. Heterosexuality can can spread disease, too. This is my point. The OP claimed that “homosexuality causes disease” and then said the fact that heterosexuals also spread sexual diseases was irrelevant. That is what I was referring to when I wrote that post.

Lou
 
It is an undeniable fact that homosexuality (The participation in or desire to participate in sexual conduct with those of the same sex.) spreads disease.

“STD’s at epidemic level within gay communities nation wide”.-- Center for Disease Control

cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/HIVFactSheets/TodaysEpidemic-508.pdf

More than half of new HIV infections occur among gay and bisexual men. Heterosexual men account for only 25%. Note that homosexuals account for less than 3% of the total population. That is staggering…3% spread half of all HIV infections nationwide.

It is absurd to compare the spread of disease within the homosexual community with the heterosexual community. The rate of disease among homosexuals is extremely higher than heterosexuals. Also just because STD’s exist in the heterosexual community is no reason to justify unnatural sexual relations. In other words…two wrongs don’t make it right.

It can be said, based on the spread of disease alone, no one can say that homosexuality does not hurt anyone. STD’s HIV and AIDS are a danger to the homosexual community and a public health threat to society.

Homosexuality also harms society.

In reality, homosexuality is nothing more than same-gender conduct among people who are innately and unchangeably heterosexual. Homosexuality is thus biologically (and to varying degrees morally) equivalent to pedophilia, sado-masochism, bestiality and many other forms of deviant behavior, or behavior that deviates from the normal design-based function of the human being.
Is Catholic13 a sock of yours (same user/different name) because have you actually read ANY of the posts here. Everything you just said has been refuted as completely inaccurate. More than inaccurate, it’s downright ignorant. It’s truly mindboggling how you can actually believe any of this. Please re read the thread. :ouch:
 
Homosexual acts can cause disease, just like any other sexual activity.

You cannot say that homosexuality can spread disease and leave it at that. Heterosexuality can can spread disease, too. This is my point. The OP claimed that “homosexuality causes disease” and then said the fact that heterosexuals also spread sexual diseases was irrelevant. That is what I was referring to when I wrote that post.

Lou
Just to add on to your comment- STDs and AIDs among women who have sex with women is lower than heterosexuals. The common factor (if we decide simplistic logic is ok to use) would be men, not sexual orientation.
 
I actually should start a thread:

How can people say Dogs don’t hurt anyone?

I mean when I was 10 I was bitten by a dog. Yet I’ve never been bitten by a cat!
Dogs also spread disease. Rabies. Cujo. Need I say more? I believe that dogs have an intrinsic disorder to bite people. But luckily they can become Cat-like thought behavioral training.

😛
 
Just to add on to your comment- STDs and AIDs among women who have sex with women is lower than heterosexuals. The common factor (if we decide simplistic logic is ok to use) would be men, not sexual orientation.
Exactly. It’s funny that the OP seems to think this irrelevant :rolleyes:

Lou
 
It looks like you’ve finally found someone who avidly supports your “homosexuality spreads disease” nonsense, Catholic13. :rolleyes:
So much for the “homosexuality doesn’t hurt anyone” defense. 😉 You guys will have to think of something else to say.

How about this: homosexuality may or may not kill you but it can make you seriously ill. Well, it will need to be polished up a bit and I’m not the best with words, so I’ll leave it to you.
 
So much for the “homosexuality doesn’t hurt anyone” defense. 😉 You guys will have to think of something else to say.

How about this: homosexuality may or may not kill you but it can make you seriously ill. Well, it will need to be polished up a bit and I’m not the best with words, so I’ll leave it to you.
So, I guess you can’t actually refute my statement. Such a shame.
 
How about this: homosexuality may or may not kill you but it can make you seriously ill. Well, it will need to be polished up a bit and I’m not the best with words, so I’ll leave it to you.
So you believe that homosexuality may kill or make seriously ill a woman?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top